| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This patch adds EFI runtime service support for RISC-V.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
[ardb: - Remove the page check]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
|
|
Before commit
d0f9ca9be11f25ef ("ARM: decompressor: run decompressor in place if loaded via UEFI")
we were rather limited in the choice of base address for the uncompressed
kernel, as we were relying on the logic in the decompressor that blindly
rounds down the decompressor execution address to the next multiple of 128
MiB, and decompresses the kernel there. For this reason, we have a lot of
complicated memory region handling code, to ensure that this memory window
is available, even though it could be occupied by reserved regions or
other allocations that may or may not collide with the uncompressed image.
Today, we simply pass the target address for the decompressed image to the
decompressor directly, and so we can choose a suitable window just by
finding a 16 MiB aligned region, while taking TEXT_OFFSET and the region
for the swapper page tables into account.
So let's get rid of the complicated logic, and instead, use the existing
bottom up allocation routine to allocate a suitable window as low as
possible, and carve out a memory region that has the right properties.
Note that this removes any dependencies on the 'dram_base' argument to
handle_kernel_image(), and so this is removed as well. Given that this
was the only remaining use of dram_base, the code that produces it is
removed entirely as well.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Uvarov <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Maxim Uvarov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
The way we use the base of DRAM in the EFI stub is problematic as it
is ill defined what the base of DRAM actually means. There are some
restrictions on the placement of FDT and initrd which are defined in
terms of dram_base, but given that the placement of the kernel in
memory is what defines these boundaries (as on ARM, this is where the
linear region starts), it is better to use the image address in these
cases, and disregard dram_base altogether.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Uvarov <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Maxim Uvarov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
The prototype of the functions handle_kernel_image & efi_enter_kernel
are defined in efi-stub.c which may result in a compiler warnings if
-Wmissing-prototypes is set in gcc compiler.
Move the prototype to efistub.h to make the compiler happy.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
On 32-bit ARM, we may boot at HYP mode, or with the MMU and caches off
(or both), even though the EFI spec does not actually support this.
While booting at HYP mode is something we might tolerate, fiddling
with the caches is a more serious issue, as disabling the caches is
tricky to do safely from C code, and running without the Dcache makes
it impossible to support unaligned memory accesses, which is another
explicit requirement imposed by the EFI spec.
So take note of the CPU mode and MMU state in the EFI stub diagnostic
output so that we can easily diagnose any issues that may arise from
this. E.g.,
EFI stub: Entering in SVC mode with MMU enabled
Also, capture the CPSR and SCTLR system register values at EFI stub
entry, and after ExitBootServices() returns, and check whether the
MMU and Dcache were disabled at any point. If this is the case, a
diagnostic message like the following will be emitted:
efi: [Firmware Bug]: EFI stub was entered with MMU and Dcache disabled, please fix your firmware!
efi: CPSR at EFI stub entry : 0x600001d3
efi: SCTLR at EFI stub entry : 0x00c51838
efi: CPSR after ExitBootServices() : 0x600001d3
efi: SCTLR after ExitBootServices(): 0x00c50838
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <[email protected]>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi into efi/core
More EFI changes for v5.8:
- Rename pr_efi/pr_efi_err to efi_info/efi_err, and use them consistently
- Simplify and unify initrd loading
- Parse the builtin command line on x86 (if provided)
- Implement printk() support, including support for wide character strings
- Some fixes for issues introduced by the first batch of v5.8 changes
- Fix a missing prototypes warning
- Simplify GDT handling in early mixed mode thunking code
- Some other minor fixes and cleanups
Conflicts:
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Fix a missing prototype warning by adding a forward declaration
for the PE/COFF entrypoint, and while at it, align the function
name between the x86 and ARM versions of the stub.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
Now that we removed the memory limit for the allocation of the
command line, there is no longer a need to use the page based
allocator so switch to a pool allocation instead.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
efi_parse_options can fail if it is unable to allocate space for a copy
of the command line. Check the return value to make sure it succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
Factor out the initrd loading into a common function that can be called
both from the generic efi-stub.c and the x86-specific x86-stub.c.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
Use efi_err if we ignore a command-line dtb= argument, so that it shows
up even on a quiet boot.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
Rename pr_efi to efi_info and pr_efi_err to efi_err to make it more
obvious that they are part of the EFI stub and not generic printk infra.
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
The practice of using __pure getter functions to access global
variables in the EFI stub dates back to the time when we had to
carefully prevent GOT entries from being emitted, because we
could not rely on the toolchain to do this for us.
Today, we use the hidden visibility pragma for all EFI stub source
files, which now all live in the same subdirectory, and we apply a
sanity check on the objects, so we can get rid of these getter
functions and simply refer to global data objects directly.
So switch over the remaining boolean variables carrying options set
on the kernel command line.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
The practice of using __pure getter functions to access global
variables in the EFI stub dates back to the time when we had to
carefully prevent GOT entries from being emitted, because we
could not rely on the toolchain to do this for us.
Today, we use the hidden visibility pragma for all EFI stub source
files, which now all live in the same subdirectory, and we apply a
sanity check on the objects, so we can get rid of these getter
functions and simply refer to global data objects directly.
Start with efi_system_table(), and convert it into a global variable.
While at it, make it a pointer-to-const, because we can.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
Now that both arm and x86 are using the linker script to place the EFI
stub's global variables in the correct section, remove __efistub_global.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c:68:6: warning:
symbol 'install_memreserve_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
Most of the arm-stub code is written in an architecture independent manner.
As a result, RISC-V can reuse most of the arm-stub code.
Rename the arm-stub.c to efi-stub.c so that ARM, ARM64 and RISC-V can use it.
This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|