| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
There is no firmware "subsystem" it's just a directory in /sys that
other portions of the kernel want to hook into. So make it a kobject
not a kset to help alivate anyone who tries to do some odd kset-like
things with this.
Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
These functions are no longer called or needed, so we can remove them.
As I rewrote the whole firmware.c file, add my copyright.
Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
braindead firmware_register interface
Needed for future firmware subsystem cleanups.
In the end, the firmware_register/unregister functions will be deleted
entirely, but we need this symbol so that subsystems can migrate over.
Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Domsch <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Tolentino <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
Dynamically create the kset instead of declaring it statically.
Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
We don't need a "default" ktype for a kset. We should set this
explicitly every time for each kset. This change is needed so that we
can make ksets dynamic, and cleans up one of the odd, undocumented
assumption that the kset/kobject/ktype model has.
This patch is based on a lot of help from Kay Sievers.
Nasty bug in the block code was found by Dave Young
<[email protected]>
Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Young <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
We need to work on cleaning up the relationship between kobjects, ksets and
ktypes. The removal of 'struct subsystem' is the first step of this,
especially as it is not really needed at all.
Thanks to Kay for fixing the bugs in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
There are a number of sparse warnings from the latest sparse
snapshot being generated from the drivers/base build. The
main culprits are due to the initialisation functions not
being declared in a header file.
Also, the firmware.c file should include <linux/device.h>
to get the prototype of firmware_register() and
firmware_unregister().
This patch moves the init function declerations from the
init.c file to the base.h, and ensures it is included in
all the relevant c sources. It also adds <linux/device.h>
to the included headers for firmware.c.
The patch does not solve all the sparse errors generated,
but reduces the count significantly.
drivers/base/core.c:161:1: warning: symbol 'devices_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/core.c:417:12: warning: symbol 'devices_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/sys.c:253:6: warning: symbol 'sysdev_shutdown' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/sys.c:326:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/sys.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_resume' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/sys.c:450:12: warning: symbol 'system_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/bus.c:133:1: warning: symbol 'bus_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/bus.c:667:12: warning: symbol 'buses_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/class.c:759:12: warning: symbol 'classes_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/platform.c:313:12: warning: symbol 'platform_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/cpu.c:110:12: warning: symbol 'cpu_dev_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/firmware.c:17:5: warning: symbol 'firmware_register' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/firmware.c:23:6: warning: symbol 'firmware_unregister' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/firmware.c:28:12: warning: symbol 'firmware_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/init.c:28:13: warning: symbol 'driver_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/dmapool.c:174:10: warning: implicit cast from nocast type
drivers/base/attribute_container.c:439:1: warning: symbol 'attribute_container_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/power/runtime.c:76:6: warning: symbol 'dpm_set_power_state' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|