aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-04-25mm/treewide: rename CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP to CONFIG_HAVE_GUP_FASTDavid Hildenbrand9-9/+9
Nowadays, we call it "GUP-fast", the external interface includes functions like "get_user_pages_fast()", and we renamed all internal functions to reflect that as well. Let's make the config option reflect that. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25x86: mm: accelerate pagefault when badaccessKefeng Wang1-9/+14
The access_error() of vma is already checked under per-VMA lock, if it is a bad access, directly handle error, no need to retry with mmap_lock again. In order to release the correct lock, pass the mm_struct into bad_area_access_error(). If mm is NULL, release vma lock, or release mmap_lock. Since the page faut is handled under per-VMA lock, count it as a vma lock event with VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]> Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25s390: mm: accelerate pagefault when badaccessKefeng Wang1-1/+2
The vm_flags of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if it is a bad access, directly handle error, no need to retry with mmap_lock again. Since the page faut is handled under per-VMA lock, count it as a vma lock event with VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25riscv: mm: accelerate pagefault when badaccessKefeng Wang1-1/+4
The access_error() of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if it is a bad access, directly handle error, no need to retry with mmap_lock again. Since the page faut is handled under per-VMA lock, count it as a vma lock event with VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS. [[email protected]: use `cause' rather than SIGSEGV, per Alexandre] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]> Tested-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected] Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25powerpc: mm: accelerate pagefault when badaccessKefeng Wang1-13/+20
The access_[pkey]_error() of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if it is a bad access, directly handle error, no need to retry with mmap_lock again. In order to release the correct lock, pass the mm_struct into bad_access_pkey()/bad_access(), if mm is NULL, release vma lock, or release mmap_lock. Since the page faut is handled under per-VMA lock, count it as a vma lock event with VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> (powerpc) Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25arm: mm: accelerate pagefault when VM_FAULT_BADACCESSKefeng Wang1-1/+3
The vm_flags of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if it is a bad access, directly set fault to VM_FAULT_BADACCESS and handle error, no need to retry with mmap_lock again. Since the page faut is handled under per-VMA lock, count it as a vma lock event with VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25arm64: mm: accelerate pagefault when VM_FAULT_BADACCESSKefeng Wang1-1/+3
The vm_flags of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if it is a bad access, directly set fault to VM_FAULT_BADACCESS and handle error, no need to retry with mmap_lock again, the latency time reduces 34% in 'lat_sig -P 1 prot lat_sig' from lmbench testcase. Since the page fault is handled under per-VMA lock, count it as a vma lock event with VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25arm64: mm: cleanup __do_page_fault()Kefeng Wang1-20/+7
Patch series "arch/mm/fault: accelerate pagefault when badaccess", v2. After VMA lock-based page fault handling enabled, if bad access met under per-vma lock, it will fallback to mmap_lock-based handling, so it leads to unnessary mmap lock and vma find again. A test from lmbench shows 34% improve after this changes on arm64, lat_sig -P 1 prot lat_sig 0.29194 -> 0.19198 This patch (of 7): The __do_page_fault() only calls handle_mm_fault() after vm_flags checked, and it is only called by do_page_fault(), let's squash it into do_page_fault() to cleanup code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25x86/mm: care about shadow stack guard gap during placementRick Edgecombe1-0/+10
When memory is being placed, mmap() will take care to respect the guard gaps of certain types of memory (VM_SHADOWSTACK, VM_GROWSUP and VM_GROWSDOWN). In order to ensure guard gaps between mappings, mmap() needs to consider two things: 1. That the new mapping isn't placed in an any existing mappings guard gaps. 2. That the new mapping isn't placed such that any existing mappings are not in *its* guard gaps. The longstanding behavior of mmap() is to ensure 1, but not take any care around 2. So for example, if there is a PAGE_SIZE free area, and a mmap() with a PAGE_SIZE size, and a type that has a guard gap is being placed, mmap() may place the shadow stack in the PAGE_SIZE free area. Then the mapping that is supposed to have a guard gap will not have a gap to the adjacent VMA. Now that the vm_flags is passed into the arch get_unmapped_area()'s, and vm_unmapped_area() is ready to consider it, have VM_SHADOW_STACK's get guard gap consideration for scenario 2. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Deepak Gupta <[email protected]> Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Cc: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25x86/mm: implement HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA_VMFLAGSRick Edgecombe2-5/+21
When memory is being placed, mmap() will take care to respect the guard gaps of certain types of memory (VM_SHADOWSTACK, VM_GROWSUP and VM_GROWSDOWN). In order to ensure guard gaps between mappings, mmap() needs to consider two things: 1. That the new mapping isn't placed in an any existing mappings guard gaps. 2. That the new mapping isn't placed such that any existing mappings are not in *its* guard gaps. The longstanding behavior of mmap() is to ensure 1, but not take any care around 2. So for example, if there is a PAGE_SIZE free area, and a mmap() with a PAGE_SIZE size, and a type that has a guard gap is being placed, mmap() may place the shadow stack in the PAGE_SIZE free area. Then the mapping that is supposed to have a guard gap will not have a gap to the adjacent VMA. Add x86 arch implementations of arch_get_unmapped_area_vmflags/_topdown() so future changes can allow the guard gap of type of vma being placed to be taken into account. This will be used for shadow stack memory. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Deepak Gupta <[email protected]> Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Cc: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25treewide: use initializer for struct vm_unmapped_area_infoRick Edgecombe13-45/+21
Future changes will need to add a new member to struct vm_unmapped_area_info. This would cause trouble for any call site that doesn't initialize the struct. Currently every caller sets each member manually, so if new ones are added they will be uninitialized and the core code parsing the struct will see garbage in the new member. It could be possible to initialize the new member manually to 0 at each call site. This and a couple other options were discussed. Having some struct vm_unmapped_area_info instances not zero initialized will put those sites at risk of feeding garbage into vm_unmapped_area(), if the convention is to zero initialize the struct and any new field addition missed a call site that initializes each field manually. So it is useful to do things similar across the kernel. The consensus (see links) was that in general the best way to accomplish taking into account both code cleanliness and minimizing the chance of introducing bugs, was to do C99 static initialization. As in: struct vm_unmapped_area_info info = {}; With this method of initialization, the whole struct will be zero initialized, and any statements setting fields to zero will be unneeded. The change should not leave cleanup at the call sides. While iterating though the possible solutions a few archs kindly acked other variations that still zero initialized the struct. These sites have been modified in previous changes using the pattern acked by the respective arch. So to be reduce the chance of bugs via uninitialized fields, perform a tree wide change using the consensus for the best general way to do this change. Use C99 static initializing to zero the struct and remove and statements that simply set members to zero. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202402280912.33AEE7A9CF@keescook/#t Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/j7bfvig3gew3qruouxrh7z7ehjjafrgkbcmg6tcghhfh3rhmzi@wzlcoecgy5rs/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Deepak Gupta <[email protected]> Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Cc: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25powerpc: use initializer for struct vm_unmapped_area_infoRick Edgecombe1-11/+9
Future changes will need to add a new member to struct vm_unmapped_area_info. This would cause trouble for any call site that doesn't initialize the struct. Currently every caller sets each member manually, so if new members are added they will be uninitialized and the core code parsing the struct will see garbage in the new member. It could be possible to initialize the new member manually to 0 at each call site. This and a couple other options were discussed, and a working consensus (see links) was that in general the best way to accomplish this would be via static initialization with designated member initiators. Having some struct vm_unmapped_area_info instances not zero initialized will put those sites at risk of feeding garbage into vm_unmapped_area() if the convention is to zero initialize the struct and any new member addition misses a call site that initializes each member manually. It could be possible to leave the code mostly untouched, and just change the line: struct vm_unmapped_area_info info to: struct vm_unmapped_area_info info = {}; However, that would leave cleanup for the members that are manually set to zero, as it would no longer be required. So to be reduce the chance of bugs via uninitialized members, instead simply continue the process to initialize the struct this way tree wide. This will zero any unspecified members. Move the member initializers to the struct declaration when they are known at that time. Leave the members out that were manually initialized to zero, as this would be redundant for designated initializers. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202402280912.33AEE7A9CF@keescook/#t Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/j7bfvig3gew3qruouxrh7z7ehjjafrgkbcmg6tcghhfh3rhmzi@wzlcoecgy5rs/ Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Deepak Gupta <[email protected]> Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Cc: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25parisc: use initializer for struct vm_unmapped_area_infoRick Edgecombe1-3/+3
Future changes will need to add a new member to struct vm_unmapped_area_info. This would cause trouble for any call site that doesn't initialize the struct. Currently every caller sets each member manually, so if new members are added they will be uninitialized and the core code parsing the struct will see garbage in the new member. It could be possible to initialize the new member manually to 0 at each call site. This and a couple other options were discussed, and a working consensus (see links) was that in general the best way to accomplish this would be via static initialization with designated member initiators. Having some struct vm_unmapped_area_info instances not zero initialized will put those sites at risk of feeding garbage into vm_unmapped_area() if the convention is to zero initialize the struct and any new member addition misses a call site that initializes each member manually. It could be possible to leave the code mostly untouched, and just change the line: struct vm_unmapped_area_info info to: struct vm_unmapped_area_info info = {}; However, that would leave cleanup for the members that are manually set to zero, as it would no longer be required. So to be reduce the chance of bugs via uninitialized members, instead simply continue the process to initialize the struct this way tree wide. This will zero any unspecified members. Move the member initializers to the struct declaration when they are known at that time. Leave the members out that were manually initialized to zero, as this would be redundant for designated initializers. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202402280912.33AEE7A9CF@keescook/#t Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/j7bfvig3gew3qruouxrh7z7ehjjafrgkbcmg6tcghhfh3rhmzi@wzlcoecgy5rs/ Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Acked-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Deepak Gupta <[email protected]> Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Cc: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25csky: use initializer for struct vm_unmapped_area_infoRick Edgecombe1-6/+6
Future changes will need to add a new member to struct vm_unmapped_area_info. This would cause trouble for any call site that doesn't initialize the struct. Currently every caller sets each member manually, so if new members are added they will be uninitialized and the core code parsing the struct will see garbage in the new member. It could be possible to initialize the new member manually to 0 at each call site. This and a couple other options were discussed, and a working consensus (see links) was that in general the best way to accomplish this would be via static initialization with designated member initiators. Having some struct vm_unmapped_area_info instances not zero initialized will put those sites at risk of feeding garbage into vm_unmapped_area() if the convention is to zero initialize the struct and any new member addition misses a call site that initializes each member manually. It could be possible to leave the code mostly untouched, and just change the line: struct vm_unmapped_area_info info to: struct vm_unmapped_area_info info = {}; However, that would leave cleanup for the members that are manually set to zero, as it would no longer be required. So to be reduce the chance of bugs via uninitialized members, instead simply continue the process to initialize the struct this way tree wide. This will zero any unspecified members. Move the member initializers to the struct declaration when they are known at that time. Leave the members out that were manually initialized to zero, as this would be redundant for designated initializers. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202402280912.33AEE7A9CF@keescook/#t Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/j7bfvig3gew3qruouxrh7z7ehjjafrgkbcmg6tcghhfh3rhmzi@wzlcoecgy5rs/ Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Deepak Gupta <[email protected]> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Cc: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm: switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flagRick Edgecombe7-17/+14
The mm_struct contains a function pointer *get_unmapped_area(), which is set to either arch_get_unmapped_area() or arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown() during the initialization of the mm. Since the function pointer only ever points to two functions that are named the same across all arch's, a function pointer is not really required. In addition future changes will want to add versions of the functions that take additional arguments. So to save a pointers worth of bytes in mm_struct, and prevent adding additional function pointers to mm_struct in future changes, remove it and keep the information about which get_unmapped_area() to use in a flag. Add the new flag to MMF_INIT_MASK so it doesn't get clobbered on fork by mmf_init_flags(). Most MM flags get clobbered on fork. In the pre-existing behavior mm->get_unmapped_area() would get copied to the new mm in dup_mm(), so not clobbering the flag preserves the existing behavior around inheriting the topdown-ness. Introduce a helper, mm_get_unmapped_area(), to easily convert code that refers to the old function pointer to instead select and call either arch_get_unmapped_area() or arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown() based on the flag. Then drop the mm->get_unmapped_area() function pointer. Leave the get_unmapped_area() pointer in struct file_operations alone. The main purpose of this change is to reorganize in preparation for future changes, but it also converts the calls of mm->get_unmapped_area() from indirect branches into a direct ones. The stress-ng bigheap benchmark calls realloc a lot, which calls through get_unmapped_area() in the kernel. On x86, the change yielded a ~1% improvement there on a retpoline config. In testing a few x86 configs, removing the pointer unfortunately didn't result in any actual size reductions in the compiled layout of mm_struct. But depending on compiler or arch alignment requirements, the change could shrink the size of mm_struct. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Acked-by: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Deepak Gupta <[email protected]> Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm: remove "prot" parameter from move_pte()David Hildenbrand1-1/+1
The "prot" parameter is unused, and using it instead of what's stored in that particular PTE would very likely be wrong. Let's simply remove it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <[email protected]> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/arch: provide pud_pfn() fallbackPeter Xu4-0/+4
The comment in the code explains the reasons. We took a different approach comparing to pmd_pfn() by providing a fallback function. Another option is to provide some lower level config options (compare to HUGETLB_PAGE or THP) to identify which layer an arch can support for such huge mappings. However that can be an overkill. [[email protected]: fix loongson defconfig] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Tested-by: Ryan Roberts <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Jones <[email protected]> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Cc: James Houghton <[email protected]> Cc: John Hubbard <[email protected]> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Yang Shi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25sparc: use is_huge_zero_pmd()Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)1-3/+3
Patch series "Convert huge_zero_page to huge_zero_folio". Almost all the callers of is_huge_zero_page() already have a folio. And they should -- is_huge_zero_page() will return false for tail pages, even if they're tail pages of the huge zero page. That's confusing, and one of the benefits of the folio conversion is to get rid of this confusion. This patch (of 8): There's no need to convert to a page, much less a folio. We can tell from the pmd whether it is a huge zero page or not. Saves 60 bytes of text. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm: convert arch_clear_hugepage_flags to take a folioMatthew Wilcox (Oracle)5-15/+15
All implementations that aren't no-ops just set a bit in the flags, and we want to use the folio flags rather than the page flags for that. Rename it to arch_clear_hugetlb_flags() while we're touching it so nobody thinks it's used for THP. [[email protected]: fix arm64 build] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25xtensa: remove uses of PG_arch_1 on individual pagesMatthew Wilcox (Oracle)1-2/+4
Since switching to the new page table range API, we disregard the PG_arch_1 (aka dcache dirty) flag on tail pages, and only pay attention to it on the folio. Fix these two missed spots where we were setting it on arbitrary pages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reported-by: Svetly Todorov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Svetly Todorov <[email protected]> [xtensa] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25sh: remove use of PG_arch_1 on individual pagesMatthew Wilcox (Oracle)1-2/+3
Patch series "Various page->flags cleanups". The first two patches are bug fixes, although I'm not sure that either architecture will have noticed. There aren't a lot of uses of page->flags left! The big build-up here is to reworking stable_page_flags(), which will definitely be a user-visible change. I think a welcome one, given the special case we had to spread the Slab flag into all tail pages. This patch (of 10): Since switching to the new page table range API, we do not set the PG_arch_1 (aka dcache clean) flag on tail pages, only on the folio. Test it on the folio. Also use page_mapped() instead of page_mapcount() as it is more efficient. [[email protected]: fix folio_flags call] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm: move follow_phys to arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.cChristoph Hellwig1-1/+28
follow_phys is only used by two callers in arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c. Move it there and hardcode the two arguments that get the same values passed by both callers. [[email protected]: conflict resolutions] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Fei Li <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/mm_init.c: remove arch_reserved_kernel_pages()Baoquan He2-9/+0
Since the current calculation of calc_nr_kernel_pages() has taken into consideration of kernel reserved memory, no need to have arch_reserved_kernel_pages() any more. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25x86: remove unneeded memblock_find_dma_reserve()Baoquan He3-50/+0
Patch series "mm/mm_init.c: refactor free_area_init_core()". In function free_area_init_core(), the code calculating zone->managed_pages and the subtracting dma_reserve from DMA zone looks very confusing. From git history, the code calculating zone->managed_pages was for zone->present_pages originally. The early rough assignment is for optimize zone's pcp and water mark setting. Later, managed_pages was introduced into zone to represent the number of managed pages by buddy. Now, zone->managed_pages is zeroed out and reset in mem_init() when calling memblock_free_all(). zone's pcp and wmark setting relying on actual zone->managed_pages are done later than mem_init() invocation. So we don't need rush to early calculate and set zone->managed_pages, just set it as zone->present_pages, will adjust it in mem_init(). And also add a new function calc_nr_kernel_pages() to count up free but not reserved pages in memblock, then assign it to nr_all_pages and nr_kernel_pages after memmap pages are allocated. This patch (of 6): Variable dma_reserve and its usage was introduced in commit 0e0b864e069c ("[PATCH] Account for memmap and optionally the kernel image as holes"). Its original purpose was to accounting for the reserved pages in DMA zone to make DMA zone's watermarks calculation more accurate on x86. However, currently there's zone->managed_pages to account for all available pages for buddy, zone->present_pages to account for all present physical pages in zone. What is more important, on x86, calculating and setting the zone->managed_pages is a temporary move, all zone's managed_pages will be zeroed out and reset to the actual value according to how many pages are added to buddy allocator in mem_init(). Before mem_init(), no buddy alloction is requested. And zone's pcp and watermark setting are all done after mem_init(). So, no need to worry about the DMA zone's setting accuracy during free_area_init(). Hence, remove memblock_find_dma_reserve() to stop calculating and setting dma_reserve. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25arm64: mm: swap: support THP_SWAP on hardware with MTEBarry Song2-17/+47
Commit d0637c505f8a1 ("arm64: enable THP_SWAP for arm64") brings up THP_SWAP on ARM64, but it doesn't enable THP_SWP on hardware with MTE as the MTE code works with the assumption tags save/restore is always handling a folio with only one page. The limitation should be removed as more and more ARM64 SoCs have this feature. Co-existence of MTE and THP_SWAP becomes more and more important. This patch makes MTE tags saving support large folios, then we don't need to split large folios into base pages for swapping out on ARM64 SoCs with MTE any more. arch_prepare_to_swap() should take folio rather than page as parameter because we support THP swap-out as a whole. It saves tags for all pages in a large folio. As now we are restoring tags based-on folio, in arch_swap_restore(), we may increase some extra loops and early-exitings while refaulting a large folio which is still in swapcache in do_swap_page(). In case a large folio has nr pages, do_swap_page() will only set the PTE of the particular page which is causing the page fault. Thus do_swap_page() runs nr times, and each time, arch_swap_restore() will loop nr times for those subpages in the folio. So right now the algorithmic complexity becomes O(nr^2). Once we support mapping large folios in do_swap_page(), extra loops and early-exitings will decrease while not being completely removed as a large folio might get partially tagged in corner cases such as, 1. a large folio in swapcache can be partially unmapped, thus, MTE tags for the unmapped pages will be invalidated; 2. users might use mprotect() to set MTEs on a part of a large folio. arch_thp_swp_supported() is dropped since ARM64 MTE was the only one who needed it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Barry Song <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <[email protected]> Acked-by: Chris Li <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Cc: Kemeng Shi <[email protected]> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Collingbourne <[email protected]> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Cc: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <[email protected]> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm: vmalloc: enable memory allocation profilingKent Overstreet1-1/+2
This wrapps all external vmalloc allocation functions with the alloc_hooks() wrapper, and switches internal allocations to _noprof variants where appropriate, for the new memory allocation profiling feature. [[email protected]: arch/um: fix forward declaration for vmalloc] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [[email protected]: undo _noprof additions in the documentation] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Tested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Viro <[email protected]> Cc: Alex Gaynor <[email protected]> Cc: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]> Cc: Benno Lossin <[email protected]> Cc: "Björn Roy Baron" <[email protected]> Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> Cc: Dennis Zhou <[email protected]> Cc: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> Cc: Pasha Tatashin <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25change alloc_pages name in dma_map_ops to avoid name conflictsSuren Baghdasaryan6-7/+7
After redefining alloc_pages, all uses of that name are being replaced. Change the conflicting names to prevent preprocessor from replacing them when it's not intended. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Tested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Viro <[email protected]> Cc: Alex Gaynor <[email protected]> Cc: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]> Cc: Benno Lossin <[email protected]> Cc: "Björn Roy Baron" <[email protected]> Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> Cc: Dennis Zhou <[email protected]> Cc: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> Cc: Pasha Tatashin <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25fix missing vmalloc.h includesKent Overstreet18-0/+19
Patch series "Memory allocation profiling", v6. Overview: Low overhead [1] per-callsite memory allocation profiling. Not just for debug kernels, overhead low enough to be deployed in production. Example output: root@moria-kvm:~# sort -rn /proc/allocinfo 127664128 31168 mm/page_ext.c:270 func:alloc_page_ext 56373248 4737 mm/slub.c:2259 func:alloc_slab_page 14880768 3633 mm/readahead.c:247 func:page_cache_ra_unbounded 14417920 3520 mm/mm_init.c:2530 func:alloc_large_system_hash 13377536 234 block/blk-mq.c:3421 func:blk_mq_alloc_rqs 11718656 2861 mm/filemap.c:1919 func:__filemap_get_folio 9192960 2800 kernel/fork.c:307 func:alloc_thread_stack_node 4206592 4 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2567 func:nf_ct_alloc_hashtable 4136960 1010 drivers/staging/ctagmod/ctagmod.c:20 [ctagmod] func:ctagmod_start 3940352 962 mm/memory.c:4214 func:alloc_anon_folio 2894464 22613 fs/kernfs/dir.c:615 func:__kernfs_new_node ... Usage: kconfig options: - CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING - CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT - CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG adds warnings for allocations that weren't accounted because of a missing annotation sysctl: /proc/sys/vm/mem_profiling Runtime info: /proc/allocinfo Notes: [1]: Overhead To measure the overhead we are comparing the following configurations: (1) Baseline with CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM=n (2) Disabled by default (CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING=y && CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_BY_DEFAULT=n) (3) Enabled by default (CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING=y && CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_BY_DEFAULT=y) (4) Enabled at runtime (CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING=y && CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_BY_DEFAULT=n && /proc/sys/vm/mem_profiling=1) (5) Baseline with CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM=y && allocating with __GFP_ACCOUNT (6) Disabled by default (CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING=y && CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_BY_DEFAULT=n) && CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM=y (7) Enabled by default (CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING=y && CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_BY_DEFAULT=y) && CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM=y Performance overhead: To evaluate performance we implemented an in-kernel test executing multiple get_free_page/free_page and kmalloc/kfree calls with allocation sizes growing from 8 to 240 bytes with CPU frequency set to max and CPU affinity set to a specific CPU to minimize the noise. Below are results from running the test on Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS with 6.8.0-rc1 kernel on 56 core Intel Xeon: kmalloc pgalloc (1 baseline) 6.764s 16.902s (2 default disabled) 6.793s (+0.43%) 17.007s (+0.62%) (3 default enabled) 7.197s (+6.40%) 23.666s (+40.02%) (4 runtime enabled) 7.405s (+9.48%) 23.901s (+41.41%) (5 memcg) 13.388s (+97.94%) 48.460s (+186.71%) (6 def disabled+memcg) 13.332s (+97.10%) 48.105s (+184.61%) (7 def enabled+memcg) 13.446s (+98.78%) 54.963s (+225.18%) Memory overhead: Kernel size: text data bss dec diff (1) 26515311 18890222 17018880 62424413 (2) 26524728 19423818 16740352 62688898 264485 (3) 26524724 19423818 16740352 62688894 264481 (4) 26524728 19423818 16740352 62688898 264485 (5) 26541782 18964374 16957440 62463596 39183 Memory consumption on a 56 core Intel CPU with 125GB of memory: Code tags: 192 kB PageExts: 262144 kB (256MB) SlabExts: 9876 kB (9.6MB) PcpuExts: 512 kB (0.5MB) Total overhead is 0.2% of total memory. Benchmarks: Hackbench tests run 100 times: hackbench -s 512 -l 200 -g 15 -f 25 -P baseline disabled profiling enabled profiling avg 0.3543 0.3559 (+0.0016) 0.3566 (+0.0023) stdev 0.0137 0.0188 0.0077 hackbench -l 10000 baseline disabled profiling enabled profiling avg 6.4218 6.4306 (+0.0088) 6.5077 (+0.0859) stdev 0.0933 0.0286 0.0489 stress-ng tests: stress-ng --class memory --seq 4 -t 60 stress-ng --class cpu --seq 4 -t 60 Results posted at: https://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/memalloc_prof_v4_stress-ng/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ This patch (of 37): The next patch drops vmalloc.h from a system header in order to fix a circular dependency; this adds it to all the files that were pulling it in implicitly. [[email protected]: fix arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [[email protected]: fix arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [[email protected]: a few places were depending on sizes.h] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [[email protected]: fix mm/kasan/hw_tags.c] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [[email protected]: fix arc build] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pasha Tatashin <[email protected]> Tested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Viro <[email protected]> Cc: Alex Gaynor <[email protected]> Cc: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]> Cc: Benno Lossin <[email protected]> Cc: "Björn Roy Baron" <[email protected]> Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> Cc: Dennis Zhou <[email protected]> Cc: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/arm: remove pmd_thp_or_huge()Peter Xu4-6/+2
ARM/ARM64 used to define pmd_thp_or_huge(). Now this macro is completely redundant. Remove it and use pmd_leaf(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Lucas Stach <[email protected]> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/treewide: remove pXd_huge()Peter Xu16-174/+2
This API is not used anymore, drop it for the whole tree. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Cc: Lucas Stach <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/treewide: replace pXd_huge() with pXd_leaf()Peter Xu7-11/+11
Now after we're sure all pXd_huge() definitions are the same as pXd_leaf(), reuse it. Luckily, pXd_huge() isn't widely used. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Cc: Lucas Stach <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/powerpc: redefine pXd_huge() with pXd_leaf()Peter Xu2-27/+14
PowerPC book3s 4K mostly has the same definition on both, except pXd_huge() constantly returns 0 for hash MMUs. As Michael Ellerman pointed out [1], it is safe to check _PAGE_PTE on hash MMUs, as the bit will never be set so it will keep returning false. As a reference, __p[mu]d_mkhuge() will trigger a BUG_ON trying to create such huge mappings for 4K hash MMUs. Meanwhile, the major powerpc hugetlb pgtable walker __find_linux_pte() already used pXd_leaf() to check leaf hugetlb mappings. The goal should be that we will have one API pXd_leaf() to detect all kinds of huge mappings (hugepd is still special in this case, though). AFAICT we need to use the pXd_leaf() impl (rather than pXd_huge()'s) to make sure ie. THPs on hash MMU will also return true. This helps to simplify a follow up patch to drop pXd_huge() treewide. NOTE: *_leaf() definition need to be moved before the inclusion of asm/book3s/64/pgtable-4k.h, which defines pXd_huge() with it. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <[email protected]> Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Cc: Lucas Stach <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/arm64: merge pXd_huge() and pXd_leaf() definitionsPeter Xu2-6/+6
Unlike most archs, aarch64 defines pXd_huge() and pXd_leaf() slightly differently. Redefine the pXd_huge() with pXd_leaf(). There used to be two traps for old aarch64 definitions over these APIs that I found when reading the code around, they're: (1) 4797ec2dc83a ("arm64: fix pud_huge() for 2-level pagetables") (2) 23bc8f69f0ec ("arm64: mm: fix p?d_leaf()") Define pXd_huge() with the current pXd_leaf() will make sure (2) isn't a problem (on PROT_NONE checks). To make sure it also works for (1), we move over the __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED check to pud_leaf(), allowing it to constantly returning "false" for 2-level pgtables, which looks even safer to cover both now. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Cc: Lucas Stach <[email protected]> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/arm: redefine pmd_huge() with pmd_leaf()Peter Xu1-6/+1
Most of the archs already define these two APIs the same way. ARM is more complicated in two aspects: - For pXd_huge() it's always checking against !PXD_TABLE_BIT, while for pXd_leaf() it's always checking against PXD_TYPE_SECT. - SECT/TABLE bits are defined differently on 2-level v.s. 3-level ARM pgtables, which makes the whole thing even harder to follow. Luckily, the second complexity should be hidden by the pmd_leaf() implementation against 2-level v.s. 3-level headers. Invoke pmd_leaf() directly for pmd_huge(), to remove the first part of complexity. This prepares to drop pXd_huge() API globally. When at it, drop the obsolete comments - it's outdated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Lucas Stach <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/arm: use macros to define pmd/pud helpersPeter Xu3-4/+5
It's already confusing that ARM 2-level v.s. 3-level defines SECT bit differently on pmd/puds. Always use a macro which is much clearer. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Lucas Stach <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/sparc: change pXd_huge() behavior to exclude swap entriesPeter Xu1-4/+2
Please refer to the previous patch on the reasoning for x86. Now sparc is the only architecture that will allow swap entries to be reported as pXd_huge(). After this patch, all architectures should forbid swap entries in pXd_huge(). [[email protected]: s/;;/;/, per Muchun] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Cc: Lucas Stach <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25mm/x86: change pXd_huge() behavior to exclude swap entriesPeter Xu1-14/+4
This patch partly reverts below commits: 3a194f3f8ad0 ("mm/hugetlb: make pud_huge() and follow_huge_pud() aware of non-present pud entry") cbef8478bee5 ("mm/hugetlb: pmd_huge() returns true for non-present hugepage") Right now, pXd_huge() definition across kernel is unclear. We have two groups that think differently on swap entries: - x86/sparc: Allow pXd_huge() to accept swap entries - all the rest: Doesn't allow pXd_huge() to accept swap entries This is so confusing. Since the sparc helpers seem to be added in 2016, which is after x86's (2015), so sparc could have followed a trend. x86 proposed such swap handling in 2015 to resolve hugetlb swap entries hit in GUP, but now GUP guards swap entries with !pXd_present() in all layers so we should be safe. We should define this API properly, one way or another, rather than keep them defined differently across archs. Gut feeling tells me that pXd_huge() shouldn't include swap entries, and it turns out that I am not the only one thinking so, the question was raised when the current pmd_huge() for x86 was proposed by Ville Syrjälä: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ I might also be missing something obvious, but why is it even necessary to treat PRESENT==0+PSE==0 as a huge entry? It is also questioned when Jason Gunthorpe reviewed the other patchset on swap entry handlings: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Revert its meaning back to original. It shouldn't have any functional change as we should be ready with guards on !pXd_present() explicitly everywhere. Note that I also dropped the "#if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2", it was there probably because it was breaking things when 3a194f3f8ad0 was proposed, according to the report here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Now we shouldn't need that. Instead of reverting to _PAGE_PSE raw check, leverage pXd_leaf(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Cc: Lucas Stach <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
2024-04-25Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski30-137/+268
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR. Conflicts: drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_prueth.c net/mac80211/chan.c 89884459a0b9 ("wifi: mac80211: fix idle calculation with multi-link") 87f5500285fb ("wifi: mac80211: simplify ieee80211_assign_link_chanctx()") https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ net/unix/garbage.c 1971d13ffa84 ("af_unix: Suppress false-positive lockdep splat for spin_lock() in __unix_gc().") 4090fa373f0e ("af_unix: Replace garbage collection algorithm.") drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_prueth.c drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_common.c 4dcd0e83ea1d ("net: ti: icssg-prueth: Fix signedness bug in prueth_init_rx_chns()") e2dc7bfd677f ("net: ti: icssg-prueth: Move common functions into a separate file") No adjacent changes. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
2024-04-25powerpc/papr_scm: Move duplicate definitions to common header filesShivaprasad G Bhat2-206/+2
papr_scm and ndtest share common PDSM payload structs like nd_papr_pdsm_health. Presently these structs are duplicated across papr_pdsm.h and ndtest.h header files. Since 'ndtest' is essentially arch independent and can run on platforms other than PPC64, a way needs to be deviced to avoid redundancy and duplication of PDSM structs in future. So the patch proposes moving the PDSM header from arch/powerpc/include- -/uapi/ to the generic include/uapi/linux directory. Also, there are some #defines common between papr_scm and ndtest which are not exported to the user space. So, move them to a header file which can be shared across ndtest and papr_scm via newly introduced include/linux/papr_scm.h. Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/170638176942.112443.2937254675538057083.stgit@ltcd48-lp2.aus.stglab.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
2024-04-25riscv: T-Head: Test availability bit before enabling MAE errataChristoph Müllner1-4/+10
T-Head's memory attribute extension (XTheadMae) (non-compatible equivalent of RVI's Svpbmt) is currently assumed for all T-Head harts. However, QEMU recently decided to drop acceptance of guests that write reserved bits in PTEs. As XTheadMae uses reserved bits in PTEs and Linux applies the MAE errata for all T-Head harts, this broke the Linux startup on QEMU emulations of the C906 emulation. This patch attempts to address this issue by testing the MAE-enable bit in the th.sxstatus CSR. This CSR is available in HW and can be emulated in QEMU. This patch also makes the XTheadMae probing mechanism reliable, because a test for the right combination of mvendorid, marchid, and mimpid is not sufficient to enable MAE. Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
2024-04-25riscv: thead: Rename T-Head PBMT to MAEChristoph Müllner3-19/+19
T-Head's vendor extension to set page attributes has the name MAE (memory attribute extension). Let's rename it, so it is clear what this referes to. Link: https://github.com/T-head-Semi/thead-extension-spec/blob/master/xtheadmae.adoc Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
2024-04-25perf/x86/intel/pt: Switch to new Intel CPU model definesTony Luck1-6/+6
New CPU #defines encode vendor and family as well as model. Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240424181500.41538-1-tony.luck%40intel.com
2024-04-25perf/x86/lbr: Switch to new Intel CPU model definesTony Luck1-1/+2
New CPU #defines encode vendor and family as well as model. Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240424181500.41519-1-tony.luck%40intel.com
2024-04-25perf/x86/intel/cstate: Switch to new Intel CPU model definesTony Luck1-72/+72
New CPU #defines encode vendor and family as well as model. Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240424181459.41500-1-tony.luck%40intel.com
2024-04-25LoongArch: Lately init pmu after smp is onlineBibo Mao1-1/+1
There is an smp function call named reset_counters() to init PMU registers of every CPU in PMU initialization state. It requires that all CPUs are online. However there is an early_initcall() wrapper for the PMU init funciton init_hw_perf_events(), so that pmu init funciton is called in do_pre_smp_initcalls() which before function smp_init(). Function reset_counters() cannot work on other CPUs since they haven't boot up still. Here replace the wrapper early_initcall() with pure_initcall(), so that the PMU init function is called after every cpu is online. Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
2024-04-25x86/sev: Make the VMPL0 checking more straight forwardTom Lendacky1-21/+14
Currently, the enforce_vmpl0() function uses a set argument when modifying the VMPL1 permissions used to test for VMPL0. If the guest is not running at VMPL0, the guest self-terminates. The function is just a wrapper for a fixed RMPADJUST function. Eliminate the function and perform the RMPADJUST directly. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ed01ddf04bfb475596b24b634fd26cffaa85173a.1713974291.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com
2024-04-25x86/sev: Rename snp_init() in boot/compressed/sev.cTom Lendacky1-81/+81
The snp_init() function in boot/compressed/sev.c is local to that file, is not called from outside of the file and is independent of the snp_init() function in kernel/sev.c. Change the name to better differentiate when each function is used. Move the renamed snp_init() and related functions up in the file to avoid having to add a forward declaration and make the function static. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/afda29585c2724b9698003f24cefa77eb35f4ffb.1713974291.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com
2024-04-25x86/sev: Shorten struct name snp_secrets_page_layout to snp_secrets_pageTom Lendacky2-4/+4
Ending a struct name with "layout" is a little redundant, so shorten the snp_secrets_page_layout name to just snp_secrets_page. No functional change. [ bp: Rename the local pointer to "secrets" too for more clarity. ] Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bc8d58302c6ab66c3beeab50cce3ec2c6bd72d6c.1713974291.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com
2024-04-25cpu: Ignore "mitigations" kernel parameter if CPU_MITIGATIONS=nSean Christopherson1-2/+6
Explicitly disallow enabling mitigations at runtime for kernels that were built with CONFIG_CPU_MITIGATIONS=n, as some architectures may omit code entirely if mitigations are disabled at compile time. E.g. on x86, a large pile of Kconfigs are buried behind CPU_MITIGATIONS, and trying to provide sane behavior for retroactively enabling mitigations is extremely difficult, bordering on impossible. E.g. page table isolation and call depth tracking require build-time support, BHI mitigations will still be off without additional kernel parameters, etc. [ bp: Touchups. ] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-04-25cpu: Re-enable CPU mitigations by default for !X86 architecturesSean Christopherson2-5/+14
Rename x86's to CPU_MITIGATIONS, define it in generic code, and force it on for all architectures exception x86. A recent commit to turn mitigations off by default if SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS=n kinda sorta missed that "cpu_mitigations" is completely generic, whereas SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS is x86-specific. Rename x86's SPECULATIVE_MITIGATIONS instead of keeping both and have it select CPU_MITIGATIONS, as having two configs for the same thing is unnecessary and confusing. This will also allow x86 to use the knob to manage mitigations that aren't strictly related to speculative execution. Use another Kconfig to communicate to common code that CPU_MITIGATIONS is already defined instead of having x86's menu depend on the common CPU_MITIGATIONS. This allows keeping a single point of contact for all of x86's mitigations, and it's not clear that other architectures *want* to allow disabling mitigations at compile-time. Fixes: f337a6a21e2f ("x86/cpu: Actually turn off mitigations by default for SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS=n") Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240413115324.53303a68%40canb.auug.org.au Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]