aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-06-09sh: add loglvl to dump_mem()Dmitry Safonov3-11/+13
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to dump_mem() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09s390: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-5/+11
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]> Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09riscv: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-3/+10
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09powerpc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-5/+13
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> (powerpc) Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09parisc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-11/+17
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09openrisc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-4/+12
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]> Cc: Stafford Horne <[email protected]> Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09nios2: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-8/+15
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09nds32: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-7/+14
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Greentime Hu <[email protected]> Cc: Vincent Chen <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09mips: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-17/+24
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: James Hogan <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Burton <[email protected]> Cc: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09microblaze: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-6/+12
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09microblaze: add loglvl to microblaze_unwind()Dmitry Safonov4-7/+8
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level parameter to microblaze_unwind() as a preparation to add show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09microblaze: add loglvl to microblaze_unwind_inner()Dmitry Safonov1-15/+23
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to microblaze_unwind_inner() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09m68k: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-5/+11
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09ia64: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-3/+10
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09ia64: pass log level as arg into ia64_do_show_stack()Dmitry Safonov2-7/+7
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to ia64_do_show_stack() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). Also, make ia64_do_show_stack() static as it's not used outside. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09hexagon: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-14/+17
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). As a good side-effect die() now prints the stacktrace with KERN_EMERG aligned with other messages. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Acked-by: Brian Cain <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09h8300: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-6/+12
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09csky: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-2/+9
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09c6x: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-7/+14
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09arm64: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-2/+8
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09arm64: add loglvl to dump_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov3-9/+11
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09arm: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-2/+8
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09arm: wire up dump_backtrace_{entry,stm}Dmitry Safonov1-5/+7
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Now that c_backtrace() always emits correct loglvl, use it for printing. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09arm: add loglvl to dump_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov1-7/+9
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). As a good side-effect __die() now prints not only "Stack:" header with KERN_EMERG, but the backtrace itself. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09arm: add loglvl to unwind_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov3-6/+8
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to unwind_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). As a good side-effect arm_syscall() is now printing errors with the same log level as the backtrace. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09arm/asm: add loglvl to c_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov6-13/+27
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09arc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov3-8/+18
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). As a good side-effect header "Stack Trace:" is now printed with the same log level as the rest of backtrace. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09alpha: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov1-11/+17
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]> Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]> Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09kallsyms/printk: add loglvl to print_ip_sym()Dmitry Safonov4-6/+6
Patch series "Add log level to show_stack()", v3. Add log level argument to show_stack(). Done in three stages: 1. Introducing show_stack_loglvl() for every architecture 2. Migrating old users with an explicit log level 3. Renaming show_stack_loglvl() into show_stack() Justification: - It's a design mistake to move a business-logic decision into platform realization detail. - I have currently two patches sets that would benefit from this work: Removing console_loglevel jumps in sysrq driver [1] Hung task warning before panic [2] - suggested by Tetsuo (but he probably didn't realise what it would involve). - While doing (1), (2) the backtraces were adjusted to headers and other messages for each situation - so there won't be a situation when the backtrace is printed, but the headers are missing because they have lesser log level (or the reverse). - As the result in (2) plays with console_loglevel for kdb are removed. The least important for upstream, but maybe still worth to note that every company I've worked in so far had an off-list patch to print backtrace with the needed log level (but only for the architecture they cared about). If you have other ideas how you will benefit from show_stack() with a log level - please, reply to this cover letter. See also discussion on v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/ This patch (of 50): print_ip_sym() needs to have a log level parameter to comply with other parts being printed. Otherwise, half of the expected backtrace would be printed and other may be missing with some logging level. The following callee(s) are using now the adjusted log level: - microblaze/unwind: the same level as headers & userspace unwind. Note that pr_debug()'s there are for debugging the unwinder itself. - nds32/traps: symbol addresses are printed with the same log level as backtrace headers. - lockdep: ip for locking issues is printed with the same log level as other part of the warning. - sched: ip where preemption was disabled is printed as error like the rest part of the message. - ftrace: bug reports are now consistent in the log level being used. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]> Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Cc: Ben Segall <[email protected]> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]> Cc: Greentime Hu <[email protected]> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: James Hogan <[email protected]> Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Burton <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Vincent Chen <[email protected]> Cc: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Cc: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> Cc: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]> Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]> Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> Cc: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Cain <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]> Cc: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]> Cc: Stafford Horne <[email protected]> Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <[email protected]> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]> Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]> Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> Cc: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]> Cc: Jeff Dike <[email protected]> Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> Cc: Guan Xuetao <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> Cc: Chris Zankel <[email protected]> Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]> Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> Cc: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]> Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Wessel <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08Merge tag 's390-5.8-1' of ↵Linus Torvalds33-630/+1003
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux Pull s390 updates from Vasily Gorbik: - Add support for multi-function devices in pci code. - Enable PF-VF linking for architectures using the pdev->no_vf_scan flag (currently just s390). - Add reipl from NVMe support. - Get rid of critical section cleanup in entry.S. - Refactor PNSO CHSC (perform network subchannel operation) in cio and qeth. - QDIO interrupts and error handling fixes and improvements, more refactoring changes. - Align ioremap() with generic code. - Accept requests without the prefetch bit set in vfio-ccw. - Enable path handling via two new regions in vfio-ccw. - Other small fixes and improvements all over the code. * tag 's390-5.8-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux: (52 commits) vfio-ccw: make vfio_ccw_regops variables declarations static vfio-ccw: Add trace for CRW event vfio-ccw: Wire up the CRW irq and CRW region vfio-ccw: Introduce a new CRW region vfio-ccw: Refactor IRQ handlers vfio-ccw: Introduce a new schib region vfio-ccw: Refactor the unregister of the async regions vfio-ccw: Register a chp_event callback for vfio-ccw vfio-ccw: Introduce new helper functions to free/destroy regions vfio-ccw: document possible errors vfio-ccw: Enable transparent CCW IPL from DASD s390/pci: Log new handle in clp_disable_fh() s390/cio, s390/qeth: cleanup PNSO CHSC s390/qdio: remove q->first_to_kick s390/qdio: fix up qdio_start_irq() kerneldoc s390: remove critical section cleanup from entry.S s390: add machine check SIGP s390/pci: ioremap() align with generic code s390/ap: introduce new ap function ap_get_qdev() Documentation/s390: Update / remove developerWorks web links ...
2020-06-08Merge tag 'iommu-updates-v5.8' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-0/+5
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu Pull iommu updates from Joerg Roedel: "A big part of this is a change in how devices get connected to IOMMUs in the core code. It contains the change from the old add_device() / remove_device() to the new probe_device() / release_device() call-backs. As a result functionality that was previously in the IOMMU drivers has been moved to the IOMMU core code, including IOMMU group allocation for each device. The reason for this change was to get more robust allocation of default domains for the iommu groups. A couple of fixes were necessary after this was merged into the IOMMU tree, but there are no known bugs left. The last fix is applied on-top of the merge commit for the topic branches. Other than that change, we have: - Removal of the driver private domain handling in the Intel VT-d driver. This was fragile code and I am glad it is gone now. - More Intel VT-d updates from Lu Baolu: - Nested Shared Virtual Addressing (SVA) support to the Intel VT-d driver - Replacement of the Intel SVM interfaces to the common IOMMU SVA API - SVA Page Request draining support - ARM-SMMU Updates from Will: - Avoid mapping reserved MMIO space on SMMUv3, so that it can be claimed by the PMU driver - Use xarray to manage ASIDs on SMMUv3 - Reword confusing shutdown message - DT compatible string updates - Allow implementations to override the default domain type - A new IOMMU driver for the Allwinner Sun50i platform - Support for ATS gets disabled for untrusted devices (like Thunderbolt devices). This includes a PCI patch, acked by Bjorn. - Some cleanups to the AMD IOMMU driver to make more use of IOMMU core features. - Unification of some printk formats in the Intel and AMD IOMMU drivers and in the IOVA code. - Updates for DT bindings - A number of smaller fixes and cleanups. * tag 'iommu-updates-v5.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu: (109 commits) iommu: Check for deferred attach in iommu_group_do_dma_attach() iommu/amd: Remove redundant devid checks iommu/amd: Store dev_data as device iommu private data iommu/amd: Merge private header files iommu/amd: Remove PD_DMA_OPS_MASK iommu/amd: Consolidate domain allocation/freeing iommu/amd: Free page-table in protection_domain_free() iommu/amd: Allocate page-table in protection_domain_init() iommu/amd: Let free_pagetable() not rely on domain->pt_root iommu/amd: Unexport get_dev_data() iommu/vt-d: Fix compile warning iommu/vt-d: Remove real DMA lookup in find_domain iommu/vt-d: Allocate domain info for real DMA sub-devices iommu/vt-d: Only clear real DMA device's context entries iommu: Remove iommu_sva_ops::mm_exit() uacce: Remove mm_exit() op iommu/sun50i: Constify sun50i_iommu_ops iommu/hyper-v: Constify hyperv_ir_domain_ops iommu/vt-d: Use pci_ats_supported() iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use pci_ats_supported() ...
2020-06-08Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)Linus Torvalds29-322/+83
Merge still more updates from Andrew Morton: "Various trees. Mainly those parts of MM whose linux-next dependents are now merged. I'm still sitting on ~160 patches which await merges from -next. Subsystems affected by this patch series: mm/proc, ipc, dynamic-debug, panic, lib, sysctl, mm/gup, mm/pagemap" * emailed patches from Andrew Morton <[email protected]>: (52 commits) doc: cgroup: update note about conditions when oom killer is invoked module: move the set_fs hack for flush_icache_range to m68k nommu: use flush_icache_user_range in brk and mmap binfmt_flat: use flush_icache_user_range exec: use flush_icache_user_range in read_code exec: only build read_code when needed m68k: implement flush_icache_user_range arm: rename flush_cache_user_range to flush_icache_user_range xtensa: implement flush_icache_user_range sh: implement flush_icache_user_range asm-generic: add a flush_icache_user_range stub mm: rename flush_icache_user_range to flush_icache_user_page arm,sparc,unicore32: remove flush_icache_user_range riscv: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h powerpc: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h openrisc: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h m68knommu: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h microblaze: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h ia64: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h hexagon: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h ...
2020-06-08module: move the set_fs hack for flush_icache_range to m68kChristoph Hellwig1-0/+4
flush_icache_range generally operates on kernel addresses, but for some reason m68k needed a set_fs override. Move that into the m68k code insted of keeping it in the module loader. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jessica Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]> Cc: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08m68k: implement flush_icache_user_rangeChristoph Hellwig2-1/+8
Rename the current flush_icache_range to flush_icache_user_range as per commit ae92ef8a4424 ("PATCH] flush icache in correct context") there seems to be an assumption that it operates on user addresses. Add a flush_icache_range around it that for now is a no-op. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08arm: rename flush_cache_user_range to flush_icache_user_rangeChristoph Hellwig2-3/+3
flush_icache_user_range will be the name for a generic primitive. Move the arm name so that arm already has an implementation. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08xtensa: implement flush_icache_user_rangeChristoph Hellwig1-0/+2
The Xtensa implementation of flush_icache_range seems to be able to cope with user addresses. Just define flush_icache_user_range to flush_icache_range. [[email protected]: fix flush_icache_user_range in noMMU configs] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Chris Zankel <[email protected]> Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08sh: implement flush_icache_user_rangeChristoph Hellwig1-0/+1
The SuperH implementation of flush_icache_range seems to be able to cope with user addresses. Just define flush_icache_user_range to flush_icache_range. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]> Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08mm: rename flush_icache_user_range to flush_icache_user_pageChristoph Hellwig11-18/+19
The function currently known as flush_icache_user_range only operates on a single page. Rename it to flush_icache_user_page as we'll need the name flush_icache_user_range for something else soon. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]> Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]> Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Cc: Greentime Hu <[email protected]> Cc: Vincent Chen <[email protected]> Cc: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]> Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <[email protected]> Cc: Stafford Horne <[email protected]> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08arm,sparc,unicore32: remove flush_icache_user_rangeChristoph Hellwig4-9/+0
flush_icache_user_range is only used by <asm-generic/cacheflush.h>, so remove it from the architectures that implement it, but don't use <asm-generic/cacheflush.h>. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> Cc: Guan Xuetao <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08riscv: use asm-generic/cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig1-59/+3
RISC-V needs almost no cache flushing routines of its own. Rely on asm-generic/cacheflush.h for the defaults. Also remove the pointless __KERNEL__ ifdef while we're at it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08powerpc: use asm-generic/cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig1-32/+10
Power needs almost no cache flushing routines of its own. Rely on asm-generic/cacheflush.h for the defaults. Also remove the pointless __KERNEL__ ifdef while we're at it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08openrisc: use asm-generic/cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig1-25/+6
OpenRISC needs almost no cache flushing routines of its own. Rely on asm-generic/cacheflush.h for the defaults. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]> Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <[email protected]> Cc: Stafford Horne <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08m68knommu: use asm-generic/cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig1-17/+2
m68knommu needs almost no cache flushing routines of its own. Rely on asm-generic/cacheflush.h for the defaults. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <[email protected]> Cc: Greg Ungerer <[email protected]> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08microblaze: use asm-generic/cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig1-27/+2
Microblaze needs almost no cache flushing routines of its own. Rely on asm-generic/cacheflush.h for the defaults. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08ia64: use asm-generic/cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig1-25/+3
IA64 needs almost no cache flushing routines of its own. Rely on asm-generic/cacheflush.h for the defaults. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08hexagon: use asm-generic/cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig1-14/+5
Hexagon needs almost no cache flushing routines of its own. Rely on asm-generic/cacheflush.h for the defaults. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Acked-by: Brian Cain <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08c6x: use asm-generic/cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig1-18/+1
C6x needs almost no cache flushing routines of its own. Rely on asm-generic/cacheflush.h for the defaults. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Acked-by: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08arm64: use asm-generic/cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig1-41/+5
ARM64 needs almost no cache flushing routines of its own. Rely on asm-generic/cacheflush.h for the defaults. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08alpha: use asm-generic/cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig1-22/+6
Alpha needs almost no cache flushing routines of its own. Rely on asm-generic/cacheflush.h for the defaults. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]> Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-08asm-generic: don't include <linux/mm.h> in cacheflush.hChristoph Hellwig2-0/+4
This seems to lead to some crazy include loops when using asm-generic/cacheflush.h on more architectures, so leave it to the arch header for now. [[email protected]: fix warning] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Nick Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Jeff Dike <[email protected]> Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> Cc: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> Cc: Vishal Verma <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Jiang <[email protected]> Cc: Keith Busch <[email protected]> Cc: Ira Weiny <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Powered by cgit, Gruvboxed by Blaster4385.