aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Fix boolreturn.cocci warningskbuild test robot1-3/+3
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:931:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'xfeatures_mxcsr_quirk' with return type bool Return statements in functions returning bool should use true/false instead of 1/0. Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306004553.GA25764@lkp-wsm-ep1 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Add FPU state copying quirk to handle XRSTOR failure on Intel ↵Rik van Riel1-0/+42
Skylake CPUs On Skylake CPUs I noticed that XRSTOR is unable to deal with states created by copyout_from_xsaves() if the xstate has only SSE/YMM state, and no FP state. That is, xfeatures had XFEATURE_MASK_SSE set, but not XFEATURE_MASK_FP. The reason is that part of the SSE/YMM state lives in the MXCSR and MXCSR_FLAGS fields of the FP state. Ensure that whenever we copy SSE or YMM state around, the MXCSR and MXCSR_FLAGS fields are also copied around. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Flip the parameter order in copy_*_to_xstate()Ingo Molnar1-2/+2
Make it more consistent with regular memcpy() semantics, where the destination argument comes first. No change in functionality. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Remove 'kbuf' parameter from the copy_user_to_xstate() APIIngo Molnar1-14/+5
No change in functionality. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Remove 'ubuf' parameter from the copy_kernel_to_xstate() APIIngo Molnar1-14/+3
No change in functionality. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Split copy_user_to_xstate() into copy_kernel_to_xstate() & ↵Ingo Molnar1-1/+65
copy_user_to_xstate() Similar to: x86/fpu: Split copy_xstate_to_user() into copy_xstate_to_kernel() & copy_xstate_to_user() No change in functionality. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Simplify __copy_xstate_to_kernel() return valuesIngo Molnar1-12/+5
__copy_xstate_to_kernel() can only return 0 (because kernel copies cannot fail), simplify the code throughout. No change in functionality. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Change 'size_total' parameter to unsigned and standardize the size ↵Ingo Molnar1-17/+15
checks in copy_xstate_to_*() 'size_total' is derived from an unsigned input parameter - and then converted to 'int' and checked for negative ranges: if (size_total < 0 || offset < size_total) { This conversion and the checks are unnecessary obfuscation, reject overly large requested copy sizes outright and simplify the underlying code. Reported-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Clarify parameter names in the copy_xstate_to_*() methodsIngo Molnar1-22/+22
Right now there's a confusing mixture of 'offset' and 'size' parameters: - __copy_xstate_to_*() input parameter 'end_pos' not not really an offset, but the full size of the copy to be performed. - input parameter 'count' to copy_xstate_to_*() shadows that of __copy_xstate_to_*()'s 'count' parameter name - but the roles are different: the first one is the total number of bytes to be copied, while the second one is a partial copy size. To unconfuse all this, use a consistent set of parameter names: - 'size' is the partial copy size within a single xstate component - 'size_total' is the total copy requested - 'offset_start' is the requested starting offset. - 'offset' is the offset within an xstate component. No change in functionality. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Remove the 'start_pos' parameter from the __copy_xstate_to_*() ↵Ingo Molnar1-10/+10
functions 'start_pos' is always 0, so remove it and remove the pointless check of 'pos < 0' which can not ever be true as 'pos' is unsigned ... No change in functionality. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Clean up the parameter definitions of copy_xstate_to_*()Ingo Molnar1-5/+5
Remove pointless 'const' of non-pointer input parameter. Remove unnecessary parenthesis that shows uncertainty about arithmetic operator precedence. Clarify copy_xstate_to_user() description. No change in functionality. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Clean up parameter order in the copy_xstate_to_*() APIsIngo Molnar1-13/+12
Parameter ordering is weird: int copy_xstate_to_kernel(unsigned int pos, unsigned int count, void *kbuf, struct xregs_state *xsave); int copy_xstate_to_user(unsigned int pos, unsigned int count, void __user *ubuf, struct xregs_state *xsave); 'pos' and 'count', which are attributes of the destination buffer, are listed before the destination buffer itself ... List them after the primary arguments instead. This makes the code more similar to regular memcpy() variant APIs. No change in functionality. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Remove 'kbuf' parameter from the copy_xstate_to_user() APIsIngo Molnar1-18/+7
The 'kbuf' parameter is unused in the _user() side of the API, remove it. This simplifies the code and makes it easier to think about. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Remove 'ubuf' parameter from the copy_xstate_to_kernel() APIsIngo Molnar1-15/+6
The 'ubuf' parameter is unused in the _kernel() side of the API, remove it. This simplifies the code and makes it easier to think about. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Split copy_xstate_to_user() into copy_xstate_to_kernel() & ↵Ingo Molnar1-7/+103
copy_xstate_to_user() copy_xstate_to_user() is a weird API - in part due to a bad API inherited from the regset APIs. But don't propagate that bad API choice into the FPU code - so as a first step split the API into kernel and user buffer handling routines. (Also split the xstate_copyout() internal helper.) The split API is a dumb duplication that should be obviously correct, the real splitting will be done in the next patch. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-09-24x86/fpu: Rename copyin_to_xsaves()/copyout_from_xsaves() to ↵Ingo Molnar1-2/+2
copy_user_to_xstate()/copy_xstate_to_user() The 'copyin/copyout' nomenclature needlessly departs from what the modern FPU code uses, which is: copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() copy_fregs_to_user() copy_fxregs_to_kernel() copy_fxregs_to_user() copy_kernel_to_fpregs() copy_kernel_to_fregs() copy_kernel_to_fxregs() copy_kernel_to_xregs() copy_user_to_fregs() copy_user_to_fxregs() copy_user_to_xregs() copy_xregs_to_kernel() copy_xregs_to_user() I.e. according to this pattern, the following rename should be done: copyin_to_xsaves() -> copy_user_to_xstate() copyout_from_xsaves() -> copy_xstate_to_user() or, if we want to be pedantic, denote that that the user-space format is ptrace: copyin_to_xsaves() -> copy_user_ptrace_to_xstate() copyout_from_xsaves() -> copy_xstate_to_user_ptrace() But I'd suggest the shorter, non-pedantic name. Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-02-20Merge branch 'x86-fpu-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+7
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 fpu updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes relate to fixes between (lack of) CPUID and FPU detection that should only affect old or weird CPUs, by Andy Lutomirski" * 'x86-fpu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/fpu: Fix the "Giving up, no FPU found" test x86/fpu: Fix CPUID-less FPU detection x86/fpu: Fix "x86/fpu: Legacy x87 FPU detected" message x86/cpu: Re-apply forced caps every time CPU caps are re-read x86/cpu: Factor out application of forced CPU caps x86/cpu: Add X86_FEATURE_CPUID x86/fpu/xstate: Move XSAVES state init to a function
2017-01-25x86/fpu: Fix "x86/fpu: Legacy x87 FPU detected" messageAndy Lutomirski1-1/+7
That message isn't at all clear -- what does "Legacy x87" even mean? Clarify it. If there's no FPU, say: x86/fpu: No FPU detected If there's an FPU that doesn't have XSAVE, say: x86/fpu: x87 FPU will use FSAVE|FXSAVE Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Matthew Whitehead <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bb839385e18e27bca23fe8666dfdad8170473045.1484705016.git.luto@kernel.org [ Small tweaks to the messages. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-01-24x86/fpu/xstate: Fix xcomp_bv in XSAVES headerYu-cheng Yu1-1/+0
The compacted-format XSAVES area is determined at boot time and never changed after. The field xsave.header.xcomp_bv indicates which components are in the fixed XSAVES format. In fpstate_init() we did not set xcomp_bv to reflect the XSAVES format since at the time there is no valid data. However, after we do copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs() in fpu__clear(), as in commit: b22cbe404a9c x86/fpu: Fix invalid FPU ptrace state after execve() and when __fpu_restore_sig() does fpu__restore() for a COMPAT-mode app, a #GP occurs. This can be easily triggered by doing valgrind on a COMPAT-mode "Hello World," as reported by Joakim Tjernlund and others: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190061 Fix it by setting xcomp_bv correctly. This patch also moves the xcomp_bv initialization to the proper place, which was in copyin_to_xsaves() as of: 4c833368f0bf x86/fpu: Set the xcomp_bv when we fake up a XSAVES area which fixed the bug too, but it's more efficient and cleaner to initialize things once per boot, not for every signal handling operation. Reported-by: Kevin Hao <[email protected]> Reported-by: Joakim Tjernlund <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [ Combined it with 4c833368f0bf. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-01-23x86/fpu: Set the xcomp_bv when we fake up a XSAVES areaKevin Hao1-0/+1
I got the following calltrace on a Apollo Lake SoC with 32-bit kernel: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 261 at arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:363 fpu__restore+0x1f5/0x260 [...] Hardware name: Intel Corp. Broxton P/NOTEBOOK, BIOS APLIRVPA.X64.0138.B35.1608091058 08/09/2016 Call Trace: dump_stack() __warn() ? fpu__restore() warn_slowpath_null() fpu__restore() __fpu__restore_sig() fpu__restore_sig() restore_sigcontext.isra.9() sys_sigreturn() do_int80_syscall_32() entry_INT80_32() The reason is that a #GP occurs when executing XRSTORS. The root cause is that we forget to set the xcomp_bv when we fake up the XSAVES area in the copyin_to_xsaves() function. Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-01-16x86/cpufeature: Add AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ featurePiotr Luc1-0/+1
Vector population count instructions for dwords and qwords are going to be available in future Intel Xeon & Xeon Phi processors. Bit 14 of CPUID[level:0x07, ECX] indicates that the instructions are supported by a processor. The specification can be found in the Intel Software Developer Manual (SDM) and in the Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference (ISE). Populate the feature bit and clear it when xsave is disabled. Signed-off-by: Piotr Luc <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Radim Krčmář <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-12-12Merge branch 'x86-fpu-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-9/+0
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 FPU updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes in this cycle were: - do a large round of simplifications after all CPUs do 'eager' FPU context switching in v4.9: remove CR0 twiddling, remove leftover eager/lazy bts, etc (Andy Lutomirski) - more FPU code simplifications: remove struct fpu::counter, clarify nomenclature, remove unnecessary arguments/functions and better structure the code (Rik van Riel)" * 'x86-fpu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/fpu: Remove clts() x86/fpu: Remove stts() x86/fpu: Handle #NM without FPU emulation as an error x86/fpu, lguest: Remove CR0.TS support x86/fpu, kvm: Remove host CR0.TS manipulation x86/fpu: Remove irq_ts_save() and irq_ts_restore() x86/fpu: Stop saving and restoring CR0.TS in fpu__init_check_bugs() x86/fpu: Get rid of two redundant clts() calls x86/fpu: Finish excising 'eagerfpu' x86/fpu: Split old_fpu & new_fpu handling into separate functions x86/fpu: Remove 'cpu' argument from __cpu_invalidate_fpregs_state() x86/fpu: Split old & new FPU code paths x86/fpu: Remove __fpregs_(de)activate() x86/fpu: Rename lazy restore functions to "register state valid" x86/fpu, kvm: Remove KVM vcpu->fpu_counter x86/fpu: Remove struct fpu::counter x86/fpu: Remove use_eager_fpu() x86/fpu: Remove the XFEATURE_MASK_EAGER/LAZY distinction x86/fpu: Hard-disable lazy FPU mode x86/crypto, x86/fpu: Remove X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU #ifdef from the crc32c code
2016-11-17x86/cpufeatures: Enable new AVX512 cpu featuresGayatri Kammela1-0/+2
Add a few new AVX512 instruction groups/features for enumeration in /proc/cpuinfo: AVX512IFMA and AVX512VBMI. Clear the flags in fpu_xstate_clear_all_cpu_caps(). CPUID.(EAX=7,ECX=0):EBX[bit 21] AVX512IFMA CPUID.(EAX=7,ECX=0):ECX[bit 1] AVX512VBMI Detailed information of cpuid bits for the features can be found at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187891 Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-11-01Merge branch 'core/urgent' into x86/fpu, to merge fixesIngo Molnar1-0/+2
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-10-19x86/cpufeature: Add AVX512_4VNNIW and AVX512_4FMAPS featuresPiotr Luc1-0/+2
AVX512_4VNNIW - Vector instructions for deep learning enhanced word variable precision. AVX512_4FMAPS - Vector instructions for deep learning floating-point single precision. These new instructions are to be used in future Intel Xeon & Xeon Phi processors. The bits 2&3 of CPUID[level:0x07, EDX] inform that new instructions are supported by a processor. The spec can be found in the Intel Software Developer Manual (SDM) or in the Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference (ISE). Define new feature flags to enumerate the new instructions in /proc/cpuinfo accordingly to CPUID bits and add the required xsave extensions which are required for proper operation. Signed-off-by: Piotr Luc <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-10-16Merge tag 'v4.9-rc1' into x86/fpu, to resolve conflictIngo Molnar1-1/+4
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-10-07x86/fpu: Remove use_eager_fpu()Andy Lutomirski1-9/+0
This removes all the obvious code paths that depend on lazy FPU mode. It shouldn't change the generated code at all. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-09-09x86/pkeys: Allocation/free syscallsDave Hansen1-1/+4
This patch adds two new system calls: int pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long init_access_rights) int pkey_free(int pkey); These implement an "allocator" for the protection keys themselves, which can be thought of as analogous to the allocator that the kernel has for file descriptors. The kernel tracks which numbers are in use, and only allows operations on keys that are valid. A key which was not obtained by pkey_alloc() may not, for instance, be passed to pkey_mprotect(). These system calls are also very important given the kernel's use of pkeys to implement execute-only support. These help ensure that userspace can never assume that it has control of a key unless it first asks the kernel. The kernel does not promise to preserve PKRU (right register) contents except for allocated pkeys. The 'init_access_rights' argument to pkey_alloc() specifies the rights that will be established for the returned pkey. For instance: pkey = pkey_alloc(flags, PKEY_DENY_WRITE); will allocate 'pkey', but also sets the bits in PKRU[1] such that writing to 'pkey' is already denied. The kernel does not prevent pkey_free() from successfully freeing in-use pkeys (those still assigned to a memory range by pkey_mprotect()). It would be expensive to implement the checks for this, so we instead say, "Just don't do it" since sane software will never do it anyway. Any piece of userspace calling pkey_alloc() needs to be prepared for it to fail. Why? pkey_alloc() returns the same error code (ENOSPC) when there are no pkeys and when pkeys are unsupported. They can be unsupported for a whole host of reasons, so apps must be prepared for this. Also, libraries or LD_PRELOADs might steal keys before an application gets access to them. This allocation mechanism could be implemented in userspace. Even if we did it in userspace, we would still need additional user/kernel interfaces to tell userspace which keys are being used by the kernel internally (such as for execute-only mappings). Having the kernel provide this facility completely removes the need for these additional interfaces, or having an implementation of this in userspace at all. Note that we have to make changes to all of the architectures that do not use mman-common.h because we use the new PKEY_DENY_ACCESS/WRITE macros in arch-independent code. 1. PKRU is the Protection Key Rights User register. It is a usermode-accessible register that controls whether writes and/or access to each individual pkey is allowed or denied. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-08-10x86/mm/pkeys: Fix compact mode by removing protection keys' XSAVE buffer ↵Dave Hansen1-121/+17
manipulation The Memory Protection Keys "rights register" (PKRU) is XSAVE-managed, and is saved/restored along with the FPU state. When kernel code accesses FPU regsisters, it does a delicate dance with preempt. Otherwise, the context switching code can get confused as to whether the most up-to-date state is in the registers themselves or in the XSAVE buffer. But, PKRU is not a normal FPU register. Using it does not generate the normal device-not-available (#NM) exceptions which means we can not manage it lazily, and the kernel completley disallows using lazy mode when it is enabled. The dance with preempt *only* occurs when managing the FPU lazily. Since we never manage PKRU lazily, we do not have to do the dance with preempt; we can access it directly. Doing it this way saves a ton of complicated code (and is faster too). Further, the XSAVES reenabling failed to patch a bit of code in fpu__xfeature_set_state() the checked for compacted buffers. That check caused fpu__xfeature_set_state() to silently refuse to work when the kernel is using compacted XSAVE buffers. This broke execute-only and future pkey_mprotect() support when using compact XSAVE buffers. But, removing fpu__xfeature_set_state() gets rid of this issue, in addition to the nice cleanup and speedup. This fixes the same thing as a fix that Sai posted: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/25/637 The fix that he posted is a much more obviously correct, but I think we should just do this instead. Reported-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Yu-Cheng Yu <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-07-21x86/fpu: Do not BUG_ON() in early FPU codeDave Hansen1-6/+13
I don't think it is really possible to have a system where CPUID enumerates support for XSAVE but that it does not have FP/SSE (they are "legacy" features and always present). But, I did manage to hit this case in qemu when I enabled its somewhat shaky XSAVE support. The bummer is that the FPU is set up before we parse the command-line or have *any* console support including earlyprintk. That turned what should have been an easy thing to debug in to a bit more of an odyssey. So a BUG() here is worthless. All it does it guarantee that if/when we hit this case we have an empty console. So, remove the BUG() and try to limp along by disabling XSAVE and trying to continue. Add a comment on why we are doing this, and also add a common "out_disable" path for leaving fpu__init_system_xstate(). Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-07-11x86/fpu/xstate: Re-enable XSAVESYu-cheng Yu1-0/+9
We did not handle XSAVES instructions correctly. There were issues in converting between standard and compacted format when interfacing with user-space. These issues have been corrected. Add a WARN_ONCE() to make it clear that XSAVES supervisor states are not yet implemented. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-07-11x86/fpu/xstate: Return NULL for disabled xstate component addressYu-cheng Yu1-0/+5
It is an error to request a disabled XSAVE/XSAVES component address. For that case, make __raw_xsave_addr() return a NULL and issue a warning. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-07-10x86/fpu/xstate: Fix xstate_offsets, xstate_sizes for non-extended xstatesYu-cheng Yu1-0/+9
The arrays xstate_offsets[] and xstate_sizes[] record XSAVE standard- format offsets and sizes. Values for non-extended state components fpu and xmm's were not initialized or used. Ptrace format conversion needs them. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cf3ea36cf30e2a99e37da6483e65446d018ff0a7.1466179491.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-07-10x86/fpu/xstate: Fix XSTATE component offset print outYu-cheng Yu1-2/+16
Component offset print out was incorrect for XSAVES. Correct it and move to a separate function. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/86602a8ac400626c6eca7125c3e15934866fc38e.1466179491.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-07-10x86/fpu/xstate: Fix PTRACE frames for XSAVESYu-cheng Yu1-8/+175
XSAVES uses compacted format and is a kernel instruction. The kernel should use standard-format, non-supervisor state data for PTRACE. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> [ Edited away artificial linebreaks. ] Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/de3d80949001305fe389799973b675cab055c457.1466179491.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com [ Made various readability edits. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-07-10x86/fpu/xstate: Fix supervisor xstate component offsetYu-cheng Yu1-23/+39
CPUID function 0x0d, sub function (i, i > 1) returns in ebx the offset of xstate component i. Zero is returned for a supervisor state. A supervisor state can only be saved by XSAVES and XSAVES uses a compacted format. There is no fixed offset for a supervisor state. This patch checks and makes sure a supervisor state offset is not recorded or mis-used. This has no effect in practice as we currently use no supervisor states, but it would be good to fix. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/81b29e40d35d4cec9f2511a856fe769f34935a3f.1466179491.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-07-10x86/fpu/xstate: Align xstate components according to CPUIDYu-cheng Yu1-28/+32
CPUID function 0x0d, sub function (i, i > 1) returns in ecx[1] the alignment requirement of component 'i' when the compacted format is used. If ecx[1] is 0, component 'i' is located immediately following the preceding component. If ecx[1] is 1, component 'i' is located on the next 64-byte boundary following the preceding component. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/331e2bef1a0a7a584f06adde095b6bbfbe166472.1466179491.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-06-18x86/fpu/xstate: Copy xstate registers directly to the signal frame when ↵Yu-cheng Yu1-1/+1
compacted format is in use XSAVES is a kernel instruction and uses a compacted format. When working with user space, the kernel should provide standard-format, non-supervisor state data. We cannot do __copy_to_user() from a compacted-format kernel xstate area to a signal frame. Dave Hansen proposes this method to simplify copy xstate directly to user. This patch is based on an earlier patch from Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Originally-from: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c36f419d525517d04209a28dd8e1e5af9000036e.1463760376.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-06-18x86/fpu/xstate: Keep init_fpstate.xsave.header.xfeatures as zero for init ↵Fenghua Yu1-4/+2
optimization Keep init_fpstate.xsave.header.xfeatures as zero for init optimization. This is important for init optimization that is implemented in processor. If a bit corresponding to an xstate in xstate_bv is 0, it means the xstate is in init status and will not be read from memory to the processor during XRSTOR/XRSTORS instruction. This largely impacts context switch performance. Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2fb4ec7f18b76e8cda057a8c0038def74a9b8044.1463760376.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-06-18x86/fpu/xstate: Rename 'xstate_size' to 'fpu_kernel_xstate_size', to ↵Fenghua Yu1-4/+4
distinguish it from 'fpu_user_xstate_size' User space uses standard format xsave area. fpstate in signal frame should have standard format size. To explicitly distinguish between xstate size in kernel space and the one in user space, we rename 'xstate_size' to 'fpu_kernel_xstate_size'. Cleanup only, no change in functionality. Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> [ Rebased the patch and cleaned up the naming. ] Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2ecbae347a5152d94be52adf7d0f3b7305d90d99.1463760376.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-06-18x86/fpu/xstate: Define and use 'fpu_user_xstate_size'Fenghua Yu1-28/+48
The kernel xstate area can be in standard or compacted format; it is always in standard format for user mode. When XSAVES is enabled, the kernel uses the compacted format and it is necessary to use a separate fpu_user_xstate_size for signal/ptrace frames. Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> [ Rebased the patch and cleaned up the naming. ] Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8756ec34dabddfc727cda5743195eb81e8caf91c.1463760376.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-04-13x86/cpufeature: Replace cpu_has_xsaves with boot_cpu_has() usageBorislav Petkov1-5/+5
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-04-13x86/cpufeature: Replace cpu_has_xsave with boot_cpu_has() usageBorislav Petkov1-4/+4
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-03-20Merge branch 'mm-pkeys-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-4/+181
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 protection key support from Ingo Molnar: "This tree adds support for a new memory protection hardware feature that is available in upcoming Intel CPUs: 'protection keys' (pkeys). There's a background article at LWN.net: https://lwn.net/Articles/643797/ The gist is that protection keys allow the encoding of user-controllable permission masks in the pte. So instead of having a fixed protection mask in the pte (which needs a system call to change and works on a per page basis), the user can map a (handful of) protection mask variants and can change the masks runtime relatively cheaply, without having to change every single page in the affected virtual memory range. This allows the dynamic switching of the protection bits of large amounts of virtual memory, via user-space instructions. It also allows more precise control of MMU permission bits: for example the executable bit is separate from the read bit (see more about that below). This tree adds the MM infrastructure and low level x86 glue needed for that, plus it adds a high level API to make use of protection keys - if a user-space application calls: mmap(..., PROT_EXEC); or mprotect(ptr, sz, PROT_EXEC); (note PROT_EXEC-only, without PROT_READ/WRITE), the kernel will notice this special case, and will set a special protection key on this memory range. It also sets the appropriate bits in the Protection Keys User Rights (PKRU) register so that the memory becomes unreadable and unwritable. So using protection keys the kernel is able to implement 'true' PROT_EXEC on x86 CPUs: without protection keys PROT_EXEC implies PROT_READ as well. Unreadable executable mappings have security advantages: they cannot be read via information leaks to figure out ASLR details, nor can they be scanned for ROP gadgets - and they cannot be used by exploits for data purposes either. We know about no user-space code that relies on pure PROT_EXEC mappings today, but binary loaders could start making use of this new feature to map binaries and libraries in a more secure fashion. There is other pending pkeys work that offers more high level system call APIs to manage protection keys - but those are not part of this pull request. Right now there's a Kconfig that controls this feature (CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS) that is default enabled (like most x86 CPU feature enablement code that has no runtime overhead), but it's not user-configurable at the moment. If there's any serious problem with this then we can make it configurable and/or flip the default" * 'mm-pkeys-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (38 commits) x86/mm/pkeys: Fix mismerge of protection keys CPUID bits mm/pkeys: Fix siginfo ABI breakage caused by new u64 field x86/mm/pkeys: Fix access_error() denial of writes to write-only VMA mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Add execute-only protection keys support x86/mm/pkeys: Create an x86 arch_calc_vm_prot_bits() for VMA flags x86/mm/pkeys: Allow kernel to modify user pkey rights register x86/fpu: Allow setting of XSAVE state x86/mm: Factor out LDT init from context init mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Add arch_validate_pkey() mm/core, arch, powerpc: Pass a protection key in to calc_vm_flag_bits() x86/mm/pkeys: Actually enable Memory Protection Keys in the CPU x86/mm/pkeys: Add Kconfig prompt to existing config option x86/mm/pkeys: Dump pkey from VMA in /proc/pid/smaps x86/mm/pkeys: Dump PKRU with other kernel registers mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Differentiate instruction fetches x86/mm/pkeys: Optimize fault handling in access_error() mm/core: Do not enforce PKEY permissions on remote mm access um, pkeys: Add UML arch_*_access_permitted() methods mm/gup, x86/mm/pkeys: Check VMAs and PTEs for protection keys x86/mm/gup: Simplify get_user_pages() PTE bit handling ...
2016-03-12x86/cpufeature: Enable new AVX-512 featuresFenghua Yu1-0/+3
A few new AVX-512 instruction groups/features are added in cpufeatures.h for enuermation: AVX512DQ, AVX512BW, and AVX512VL. Clear the flags in fpu__xstate_clear_all_cpu_caps(). The specification for latest AVX-512 including the features can be found at: https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf Note, I didn't enable the flags in KVM. Hopefully the KVM guys can pick up the flags and enable them in KVM. Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Gleb Natapov <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Ravi V Shankar <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [ Added more detailed feature descriptions. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-02-18mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Add execute-only protection keys supportDave Hansen1-2/+0
Protection keys provide new page-based protection in hardware. But, they have an interesting attribute: they only affect data accesses and never affect instruction fetches. That means that if we set up some memory which is set as "access-disabled" via protection keys, we can still execute from it. This patch uses protection keys to set up mappings to do just that. If a user calls: mmap(..., PROT_EXEC); or mprotect(ptr, sz, PROT_EXEC); (note PROT_EXEC-only without PROT_READ/WRITE), the kernel will notice this, and set a special protection key on the memory. It also sets the appropriate bits in the Protection Keys User Rights (PKRU) register so that the memory becomes unreadable and unwritable. I haven't found any userspace that does this today. With this facility in place, we expect userspace to move to use it eventually. Userspace _could_ start doing this today. Any PROT_EXEC calls get converted to PROT_READ inside the kernel, and would transparently be upgraded to "true" PROT_EXEC with this code. IOW, userspace never has to do any PROT_EXEC runtime detection. This feature provides enhanced protection against leaking executable memory contents. This helps thwart attacks which are attempting to find ROP gadgets on the fly. But, the security provided by this approach is not comprehensive. The PKRU register which controls access permissions is a normal user register writable from unprivileged userspace. An attacker who can execute the 'wrpkru' instruction can easily disable the protection provided by this feature. The protection key that is used for execute-only support is permanently dedicated at compile time. This is fine for now because there is currently no API to set a protection key other than this one. Despite there being a constant PKRU value across the entire system, we do not set it unless this feature is in use in a process. That is to preserve the PKRU XSAVE 'init state', which can lead to faster context switches. PKRU *is* a user register and the kernel is modifying it. That means that code doing: pkru = rdpkru() pkru |= 0x100; mmap(..., PROT_EXEC); wrpkru(pkru); could lose the bits in PKRU that enforce execute-only permissions. To avoid this, we suggest avoiding ever calling mmap() or mprotect() when the PKRU value is expected to be unstable. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Chen Gang <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Chinner <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Piotr Kwapulinski <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]> Cc: Vladimir Murzin <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-02-18x86/mm/pkeys: Allow kernel to modify user pkey rights registerDave Hansen1-0/+74
The Protection Key Rights for User memory (PKRU) is a 32-bit user-accessible register. It contains two bits for each protection key: one to write-disable (WD) access to memory covered by the key and another to access-disable (AD). Userspace can read/write the register with the RDPKRU and WRPKRU instructions. But, the register is saved and restored with the XSAVE family of instructions, which means we have to treat it like a floating point register. The kernel needs to write to the register if it wants to implement execute-only memory or if it implements a system call to change PKRU. To do this, we need to create a 'pkru_state' buffer, read the old contents in to it, modify it, and then tell the FPU code that there is modified data in there so it can (possibly) move the buffer back in to the registers. This uses the fpu__xfeature_set_state() function that we defined in the previous patch. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-02-18x86/fpu: Allow setting of XSAVE stateDave Hansen1-2/+96
We want to modify the Protection Key rights inside the kernel, so we need to change PKRU's contents. But, if we do a plain 'wrpkru', when we return to userspace we might do an XRSTOR and wipe out the kernel's 'wrpkru'. So, we need to go after PKRU in the xsave buffer. We do this by: 1. Ensuring that we have the XSAVE registers (fpregs) in the kernel FPU buffer (fpstate) 2. Looking up the location of a given state in the buffer 3. Filling in the stat 4. Ensuring that the hardware knows that state is present there (basically that the 'init optimization' is not in place). 5. Copying the newly-modified state back to the registers if necessary. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-02-16x86/fpu, x86/mm/pkeys: Add PKRU xsave fields and data structuresDave Hansen1-1/+6
The protection keys register (PKRU) is saved and restored using xsave. Define the data structure that we will use to access it inside the xsave buffer. Note that we also have to widen the printk of the xsave feature masks since this is feature 0x200 and we only did two characters before. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-02-16x86/fpu: Add placeholder for 'Processor Trace' XSAVE stateDave Hansen1-2/+8
There is an XSAVE state component for Intel Processor Trace (PT). But, we do not currently use it. We add a placeholder in the code for it so it is not a mystery and also so we do not need an explicit enum initialization for Protection Keys in a moment. Why don't we use it? We might end up using this at _some_ point in the future. But, this is a "system" state which requires using the currently unsupported XSAVES feature. Unlike all the other XSAVE states, PT state is also not directly tied to a thread. You might context-switch between threads, but not want to change any of the PT state. Or, you might switch between threads, and *do* want to change PT state, all depending on what is being traced. We currently just manually set some MSRs to do this PT context switching, and it is unclear whether replacing our direct MSR use with XSAVE will be a net win or loss, both in code complexity and performance. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>