| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Make early loading message match late loading message and print both old
and new revisions.
This is helpful to know what the BIOS loaded revision is before an early
update.
Cache the early BIOS revision before the microcode update and have
print_ucode_info() print both the old and new revision in the same
format as microcode_reload_late().
[ bp: Massage, remove useless comment. ]
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
print_ucode_info() takes a struct ucode_cpu_info pointer as parameter.
Its sole purpose is to print the microcode revision.
The only available ucode_cpu_info always describes the currently loaded
microcode revision. After a microcode update is successful, this is the
new revision, or on failure it is the original revision.
In preparation for future changes, replace the struct ucode_cpu_info
pointer parameter with a plain integer which contains the revision
number and adjust the call sites accordingly.
No functional change.
[ bp:
- Fix + cleanup commit message.
- Revert arbitrary, unrelated change.
]
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 microcode and IFS updates from Borislav Petkov:
"The IFS (In-Field Scan) stuff goes through tip because the IFS driver
uses the same structures and similar functionality as the microcode
loader and it made sense to route it all through this branch so that
there are no conflicts.
- Add support for multiple testing sequences to the Intel In-Field
Scan driver in order to be able to run multiple different test
patterns. Rework things and remove the BROKEN dependency so that
the driver can be enabled (Jithu Joseph)
- Remove the subsys interface usage in the microcode loader because
it is not really needed
- A couple of smaller fixes and cleanups"
* tag 'x86_microcode_for_v6.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (24 commits)
x86/microcode/intel: Do not retry microcode reloading on the APs
x86/microcode/intel: Do not print microcode revision and processor flags
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add missing kernel-doc entry
Revert "platform/x86/intel/ifs: Mark as BROKEN"
Documentation/ABI: Update IFS ABI doc
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add current_batch sysfs entry
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove reload sysfs entry
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add metadata validation
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Use generic microcode headers and functions
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add metadata support
x86/microcode/intel: Use a reserved field for metasize
x86/microcode/intel: Add hdr_type to intel_microcode_sanity_check()
x86/microcode/intel: Reuse microcode_sanity_check()
x86/microcode/intel: Use appropriate type in microcode_sanity_check()
x86/microcode/intel: Reuse find_matching_signature()
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove memory allocation from load path
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove image loading during init
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Return a more appropriate error code
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove unused selection
x86/microcode: Drop struct ucode_cpu_info.valid
...
|
|
The retries in load_ucode_intel_ap() were in place to support systems
with mixed steppings. Mixed steppings are no longer supported and there is
only one microcode image at a time. Any retries will simply reattempt to
apply the same image over and over without making progress.
[ bp: Zap the circumstantial reasoning from the commit message. ]
Fixes: 06b8534cb728 ("x86/microcode: Rework microcode loading")
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
collect_cpu_info() is used to collect the current microcode revision and
processor flags on every CPU.
It had a weird mechanism to try to mimick a "once" functionality in the
sense that, that information should be issued only when it is differing
from the previous CPU.
However (1):
the new calling sequence started doing that in parallel:
microcode_init()
|-> schedule_on_each_cpu(setup_online_cpu)
|-> collect_cpu_info()
resulting in multiple redundant prints:
microcode: sig=0x50654, pf=0x80, revision=0x2006e05
microcode: sig=0x50654, pf=0x80, revision=0x2006e05
microcode: sig=0x50654, pf=0x80, revision=0x2006e05
However (2):
dumping this here is not that important because the kernel does not
support mixed silicon steppings microcode. Finally!
Besides, there is already a pr_info() in microcode_reload_late() that
shows both the old and new revisions.
What is more, the CPU signature (sig=0x50654) and Processor Flags
(pf=0x80) above aren't that useful to the end user, they are available
via /proc/cpuinfo and they don't change anyway.
Remove the redundant pr_info().
[ bp: Heavily massage. ]
Fixes: b6f86689d5b7 ("x86/microcode: Rip out the subsys interface gunk")
Reported-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
READ/WRITE proved to be actively confusing - the meanings are
"data destination, as used with read(2)" and "data source, as
used with write(2)", but people keep interpreting those as
"we read data from it" and "we write data to it", i.e. exactly
the wrong way.
Call them ITER_DEST and ITER_SOURCE - at least that is harder
to misinterpret...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
|
|
IFS test images and microcode blobs use the same header format.
Microcode blobs use header type of 1, whereas IFS test images
will use header type of 2.
In preparation for IFS reusing intel_microcode_sanity_check(),
add header type as a parameter for sanity check.
[ bp: Touchups. ]
Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
IFS test image carries the same microcode header as regular Intel
microcode blobs.
Reuse microcode_sanity_check() in the IFS driver to perform sanity check
of the IFS test images too.
Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The data type of the @print_err parameter used by microcode_sanity_check()
is int. In preparation for exporting this function to be used by
the IFS driver convert it to a more appropriate bool type for readability.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
IFS uses test images provided by Intel that can be regarded as firmware.
An IFS test image carries microcode header with an extended signature
table.
Reuse find_matching_signature() for verifying if the test image header
or the extended signature table indicate whether that image is fit to
run on a system.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
request_microcode_fw() can always request firmware now so drop this
superfluous argument.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
181b6f40e9ea ("x86/microcode: Rip out the OLD_INTERFACE")
removed the old microcode loading interface but forgot to remove the
related ->request_microcode_user() functionality which it uses.
Rip it out now too.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
IFS is a CPU feature that allows a binary blob, similar to microcode,
to be loaded and consumed to perform low level validation of CPU
circuitry. In fact, it carries the same Processor Signature
(family/model/stepping) details that are contained in Intel microcode
blobs.
In support of an IFS driver to trigger loading, validation, and running
of these tests blobs, make the functionality of cpu_signatures_match()
and collect_cpu_info_early() available outside of the microcode driver.
Add an "intel_" prefix and drop the "_early" suffix from
collect_cpu_info_early() and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() it. Add
declaration to x86 <asm/cpu.h>
Make cpu_signatures_match() an inline function in x86 <asm/cpu.h>,
and also give it an "intel_" prefix.
No functional change intended.
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
|
|
The microcode loader has been looping through __start_builtin_fw down to
__end_builtin_fw to look for possibly built-in firmware for microcode
updates.
Now that the firmware loader code has exported an API for looping
through the kernel's built-in firmware section, use it and drop the x86
implementation in favor.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
loading
Currently, scan_microcode() leverages microcode_matches() to check
if the microcode matches the CPU by comparing the family and model.
However, the processor stepping and flags of the microcode signature
should also be considered when saving a microcode patch for early
update.
Use find_matching_signature() in scan_microcode() and get rid of the
now-unused microcode_matches() which is a good cleanup in itself.
Complete the verification of the patch being saved for early loading in
save_microcode_patch() directly. This needs to be done there too because
save_mc_for_early() will call save_microcode_patch() too.
The second reason why this needs to be done is because the loader still
tries to support, at least hypothetically, mixed-steppings systems and
thus adds all patches to the cache that belong to the same CPU model
albeit with different steppings.
For example:
microcode: CPU: sig=0x906ec, pf=0x2, rev=0xd6
microcode: mc_saved[0]: sig=0x906e9, pf=0x2a, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23
microcode: mc_saved[1]: sig=0x906ea, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19000, date = 2020-04-27
microcode: mc_saved[2]: sig=0x906eb, pf=0x2, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23
microcode: mc_saved[3]: sig=0x906ec, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19000, date = 2020-04-27
microcode: mc_saved[4]: sig=0x906ed, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23
The patch which is being saved for early loading, however, can only be
the one which fits the CPU this runs on so do the signature verification
before saving.
[ bp: Do signature verification in save_microcode_patch()
and rewrite commit message. ]
Fixes: ec400ddeff20 ("x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU")
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208535
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
... in order to not pollute dmesg with a line for each updated microcode
engine.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Jon Grimm <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Mihai Carabas <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Cc: x86-ml <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-or-later
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
Change generic_load_microcode() to use the iov_iter API instead of a
clumsy open-coded version which has to pay attention to __user data
or kernel data, depending on the loading method. This allows to avoid
explicit casting between user and kernel pointers.
Because the iov_iter API makes it hard to read the same location twice,
as a side effect, also fix a double-read of the microcode header (which
could e.g. lead to out-of-bounds reads in microcode_sanity_check()).
Not that it matters much, only root is allowed to load microcode
anyway...
[ bp: Massage a bit, sort function-local variables. ]
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: x86-ml <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Handle the case where microcode gets loaded on the BSP's hyperthread
sibling first and the boot_cpu_data's microcode revision doesn't get
updated because of early exit due to the siblings sharing a microcode
engine.
For that, simply write the updated revision on all CPUs unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Filippo Sironi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
When preparing an MCE record for logging, boot_cpu_data.microcode is used
to read out the microcode revision on the box.
However, on systems where late microcode update has happened, the microcode
revision output in a MCE log record is wrong because
boot_cpu_data.microcode is not updated when the microcode gets updated.
But, the microcode revision saved in boot_cpu_data's microcode member
should be kept up-to-date, regardless, for consistency.
Make it so.
Fixes: fa94d0c6e0f3 ("x86/MCE: Save microcode revision in machine check records")
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Free useless ucode_patch entry when it's replaced.
[ bp: Drop the memfree_patch() two-liner. ]
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Srinivas REDDY Eeda <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/888102f0-fd22-459d-b090-a1bd8a00cb2b@default
|
|
save_mc_for_early() was a no-op on !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU but the
generic_load_microcode() path saves the microcode patches it has found into
the cache of patches which is used for late loading too. Regardless of
whether CPU hotplug is used or not.
Make the saving unconditional so that late loading can find the proper
patch.
Reported-by: Vitezslav Samel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Vitezslav Samel <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Return UCODE_NEW from the scanning functions to denote that new microcode
was found and only then attempt the expensive synchronization dance.
Reported-by: Emanuel Czirai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Emanuel Czirai <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The cache might contain a newer patch - look in there first.
A follow-on change will make sure newest patches are loaded into the
cache of microcode patches.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Updating microcode is less error prone when caches have been flushed and
depending on what exactly the microcode is updating. For example, some
of the issues around certain Broadwell parts can be addressed by doing a
full cache flush.
[ Borislav: Massage it and use native_wbinvd() in both cases. ]
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
After updating microcode on one of the threads of a core, the other
thread sibling automatically gets the update since the microcode
resources on a hyperthreaded core are shared between the two threads.
Check the microcode revision on the CPU before performing a microcode
update and thus save us the WRMSR 0x79 because it is a particularly
expensive operation.
[ Borislav: Massage changelog and coding style. ]
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
... so that callers can know when microcode was updated and act
accordingly.
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, x86_cache_size is of type int, which makes no sense as we
will never have a valid cache size equal or less than 0. So instead of
initializing this variable to -1, it can perfectly be initialized to 0
and use it as an unsigned variable instead.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1464429
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
x86_mask is a confusing name which is hard to associate with the
processor's stepping.
Additionally, correct an indent issue in lib/cpu.c.
Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <[email protected]>
[ Updated it to more recent kernels. ]
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Commit b94b73733171 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with a
revision check") reduced the impact of erratum BDF90 for Broadwell model
79.
The impact can be reduced further by checking the size of the last level
cache portion per core.
Tony: "The erratum says the problem only occurs on the large-cache SKUs.
So we only need to avoid the update if we are on a big cache SKU that is
also running old microcode."
For more details, see erratum BDF90 in document #334165 (Intel Xeon
Processor E7-8800/4800 v4 Product Family Specification Update) from
September 2017.
Fixes: b94b73733171 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with a revision check")
Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Instead of blacklisting all model 79 CPUs when attempting a late
microcode loading, limit that only to CPUs with microcode revisions <
0x0b000021 because only on those late loading may cause a system hang.
For such processors either:
a) a BIOS update which might contain a newer microcode revision
or
b) the early microcode loading method
should be considered.
Processors with revisions 0x0b000021 or higher will not experience such
hangs.
For more details, see erratum BDF90 in document #334165 (Intel Xeon
Processor E7-8800/4800 v4 Product Family Specification Update) from
September 2017.
[ bp: Heavily massage commit message and pr_* statements. ]
Fixes: 723f2828a98c ("x86/microcode/intel: Disable late loading on model 79")
Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: x86-ml <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # v4.14
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Commit:
ec400ddeff20 ("x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU")
... grubbed into tlbflush internals without coherent explanation.
Since it says its a precaution and the SDM doesn't mention anything like
this, take it out back.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: David Laight <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Blacklist Broadwell X model 79 for late loading due to an erratum.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Avoid potentially dereferencing a NULL pointer when saving a microcode
patch for early loading on the application processors.
While at it, drop the IS_ERR() checking in favor of simpler, NULL-ptr
checks which are sufficient and rename __alloc_microcode_buf() to
memdup_patch() to more precisely denote what it does.
No functionality change.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The helper function __load_ucode_amd() and pointer intel_ucode_patch do
not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
Fixes those sparse warnings:
"symbol '__load_ucode_amd' was not declared. Should it be static?"
"symbol 'intel_ucode_patch' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Normally, when the initrd is gone, we can't search it for microcode
blobs to apply anymore. For that we need to stash away the patch in our
own storage.
And save_microcode_in_initrd_intel() looks like the proper place to
do that from. So in order for early loading to work, invalidate the
intel_ucode_patch pointer to the patch *before* scanning the initrd one
last time.
If the scanning code finds a microcode patch, it will assign that
pointer again, this time with our own storage's address.
This way, early microcode application during resume-from-RAM works too,
even after the initrd is long gone.
Tested-by: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
During early boot, load_ucode_intel_ap() uses __load_ucode_intel()
to obtain a pointer to the relevant microcode patch (embedded in the
initrd), and stores this value in 'intel_ucode_patch' to speed up the
microcode patch application for subsequent CPUs.
On resuming from suspend-to-RAM, however, load_ucode_ap() calls
load_ucode_intel_ap() for each non-boot-CPU. By then the initramfs is
long gone so the pointer stored in 'intel_ucode_patch' no longer points to
a valid microcode patch.
Clear that pointer so that we effectively fall back to the CPU hotplug
notifier callbacks to update the microcode.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
[ Edit and massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # 4.10..
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Cc: Tigran Aivazian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
This was meant to save us the scanning of the microcode containter in
the initrd since the first AP had already done that but it can also hurt
us:
Imagine a single hyperthreaded CPU (Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270, for
example) which updates the microcode on the BSP but since the microcode
engine is shared between the two threads, the update on CPU1 doesn't
happen because it has already happened on CPU0 and we don't find a newer
microcode revision on CPU1.
Which doesn't set the intel_ucode_patch pointer and at initrd
jettisoning time we don't save the microcode patch for later
application.
Now, when we suspend to RAM, the loaded microcode gets cleared so we
need to reload but there's no patch saved in the cache.
Removing the optimization fixes this issue and all is fine and dandy.
Fixes: 06b8534cb728 ("x86/microcode: Rework microcode loading")
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
|
|
In generic_load_microcode(), curr_mc_size is the size of the last
allocated buffer and since we have this performance "optimization"
there to vmalloc a new buffer only when the current one is bigger,
curr_mc_size ends up becoming the size of the biggest buffer we've seen
so far.
However, we end up saving the microcode patch which matches our CPU
and its size is not curr_mc_size but the respective mc_size during the
iteration while we're staring at it.
So save that mc_size into a separate variable and use it to store the
previously found microcode buffer.
Without this fix, we could get oops like this:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc9000e30f000
IP: __memcpy+0x12/0x20
...
Call Trace:
? kmemdup+0x43/0x60
__alloc_microcode_buf+0x44/0x70
save_microcode_patch+0xd4/0x150
generic_load_microcode+0x1b8/0x260
request_microcode_user+0x15/0x20
microcode_write+0x91/0x100
__vfs_write+0x34/0x120
vfs_write+0xc1/0x130
SyS_write+0x56/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x160
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
Fixes: 06b8534cb728 ("x86/microcode: Rework microcode loading")
Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
|
|
We allocate struct ucode_patch here. @size is the size of microcode data
and used for kmemdup() later in this function.
Fixes: 06b8534cb728 ("x86/microcode: Rework microcode loading")
Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
|
|
Since on Intel we're required to do CPUID(1) first, before reading
the microcode revision MSR, let's add a special helper which does the
required steps so that we don't forget to do them next time, when we
want to read the microcode revision.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
|
|
Intel supplies the microcode revision value in MSR 0x8b
(IA32_BIOS_SIGN_ID) after CPUID(1) has been executed. Execute it each
time before reading that MSR.
It used to do sync_core() which did do CPUID but
c198b121b1a1 ("x86/asm: Rewrite sync_core() to use IRET-to-self")
changed the sync_core() implementation so we better make the microcode
loading case explicit, as the SDM documents it.
Reported-and-tested-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
|
|
The Intel microcode driver is using sync_core() to mean "do CPUID
with EAX=1". I want to rework sync_core(), but first the Intel
microcode driver needs to stop depending on its current behavior.
Reported-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Whitehead <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>
Cc: xen-devel <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/535a025bb91fed1a019c5412b036337ad239e5bb.1481307769.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
|
|
Yeah, I know, I know, this is a huuge patch and reviewing it is hard.
Sorry but this is the only way I could think of in which I can rewrite
the microcode patches loading procedure without breaking (knowingly) the
driver.
So maybe this patch is easier to review if one looks at the files after
the patch has been applied instead at the diff. Because then it becomes
pretty obvious:
* The BSP-loading path - load_ucode_bsp() is working independently from
the AP path now and it doesn't save any pointers or patches anymore -
it solely parses the builtin or initrd microcode and applies the patch.
That's it.
This fixes the CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY offset fun more solidly.
* The AP-loading path - load_ucode_ap() then goes and scans
builtin/initrd *again* for the microcode patches but it caches them this
time so that we don't have to do that scan on each AP but only once.
This simplifies the code considerably.
Then, when we save the microcode from the initrd/builtin, we go and
add the relevant patches to our own cache. The AMD side did do that
and now the Intel side does it too. So no more pointer copying and
blabla, we save the microcode patches ourselves and are independent from
initrd/builtin.
This whole conversion gives us other benefits like unifying the
initrd parsing into a single function: find_microcode_in_initrd() is
used by both.
The diffstat speaks for itself: 456 insertions(+), 695 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Its functions are used in intel.c only now, so get rid of it. Make
functions static.
No functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Make it return the ucode_state directly instead of assigning to a state
variable and jumping to an out: label.
No functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
... in order to avoid #ifdeffery in code computing the ASLR randomization
offset. Remove that #ifdeffery in the microcode loader.
Suggested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Garnier <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY=y randomizes the physical memmap and thus the
address where the initrd is located. Therefore, we need to add the
offset KASLR put us to in order to find the initrd again on the AP path.
In the future, we will get rid of the initrd address caching and query
the address on both the BSP and AP paths but that would need more work.
Thanks to Nicolai Stange for the good bisection and debugging work.
Reported-and-tested-by: Nicolai Stange <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
On large systems the microcode driver is very noisy, because it prints a
line for each CPU. The lines are redundant because usually all CPUs are
updated to the same microcode revision.
All other subsystems have been patched previously to not print a line
for each CPU. Only the microcode driver is left.
Only print an microcode revision update when something changed. This
results in typically only a single line being printed.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|