aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-05-30x86: intel_epb: Do not build when CONFIG_PM is unsetRafael J. Wysocki1-21/+1
Commit 9ed0985332a6 ("x86: intel_epb: Take CONFIG_PM into account") prevented the majority of the Performance and Energy Bias Hint (EPB) handling code from being built when CONFIG_PM is unset to fix a regression introduced by commit b9c273babce7 ("PM / arch: x86: MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS sysfs interface"). In hindsight, however, it would be better to skip all of the EPB handling code for CONFIG_PM unset as there really is no reason for it to be there in that case. Namely, if the EPB is not touched by the kernel at all with CONFIG_PM unset, there is no need to worry about modifying the EPB inadvertently on CPU online and since the system will not suspend or hibernate then, there is no need to worry about possible modifications of the EPB by the platform firmware during system-wide PM transitions. For this reason, revert the changes made by commit 9ed0985332a6 and only allow intel_epb.o to be built when CONFIG_PM is set. Note that this changes the behavior of the kernels built with CONFIG_PM unset as they will not modify the EPB on boot if it is zero initially any more, so it is not a fix strictly speaking, but users building their kernels with CONFIG_PM unset really should not expect them to take energy efficiency into account. Moreover, if CONFIG_PM is unset for performance reasons, leaving EPB as set initially by the platform firmware will actually be consistent with the user's expectations. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2019-05-10x86: intel_epb: Take CONFIG_PM into accountRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+21
Commit b9c273babce7 ("PM / arch: x86: MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS sysfs interface") caused kernels built with CONFIG_PM unset to crash on systems supporting the Performance and Energy Bias Hint (EPB), because it attempts to add files to sysfs directories that don't exist on those systems. Prevent that from happening by taking CONFIG_PM into account so that the code depending on it is not compiled at all when it is not set. Fixes: b9c273babce7 ("PM / arch: x86: MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS sysfs interface") Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2019-04-07PM / arch: x86: MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS sysfs interfaceRafael J. Wysocki1-4/+89
The Performance and Energy Bias Hint (EPB) is expected to be set by user space through the generic MSR interface, but that interface is not particularly nice and there are security concerns regarding it, so it is not always available. For this reason, add a sysfs interface for reading and updating the EPB, in the form of a new attribute, energy_perf_bias, located under /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu#/power/ for online CPUs that support the EPB feature. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
2019-04-07PM / arch: x86: Rework the MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS handlingRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+131
The current handling of MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS in the kernel is problematic, because it may cause changes made by user space to that MSR (with the help of the x86_energy_perf_policy tool, for example) to be lost every time a CPU goes offline and then back online as well as during system-wide power management transitions into sleep states and back into the working state. The first problem is that if the current EPB value for a CPU going online is 0 ('performance'), the kernel will change it to 6 ('normal') regardless of whether or not this is the first bring-up of that CPU. That also happens during system-wide resume from sleep states (including, but not limited to, hibernation). However, the EPB may have been adjusted by user space this way and the kernel should not blindly override that setting. The second problem is that if the platform firmware resets the EPB values for any CPUs during system-wide resume from a sleep state, the kernel will not restore their previous EPB values that may have been set by user space before the preceding system-wide suspend transition. Again, that behavior may at least be confusing from the user space perspective. In order to address these issues, rework the handling of MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS so that the EPB value is saved on CPU offline and restored on CPU online as well as (for the boot CPU) during the syscore stages of system-wide suspend and resume transitions, respectively. However, retain the policy by which the EPB is set to 6 ('normal') on the first bring-up of each CPU if its initial value is 0, based on the observation that 0 may mean 'not initialized' just as well as 'performance' in that case. While at it, move the MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS handling code into a separate file and document it in Documentation/admin-guide. Fixes: abe48b108247 (x86, intel, power: Initialize MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS) Fixes: b51ef52df71c (x86/cpu: Restore MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS after resume) Reported-by: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>