aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-05-08bpf, arm64: Add support for lse atomics in bpf_arenaPuranjay Mohan2-9/+40
When LSE atomics are available, BPF atomic instructions are implemented as single ARM64 atomic instructions, therefore it is easy to enable these in bpf_arena using the currently available exception handling setup. LL_SC atomics use loops and therefore would need more work to enable in bpf_arena. Enable LSE atomics based instructions in bpf_arena and use the bpf_jit_supports_insn() callback to reject atomics in bpf_arena if LSE atomics are not available. All atomics and arena_atomics selftests are passing: [root@ip-172-31-2-216 bpf]# ./test_progs -a atomics,arena_atomics #3/1 arena_atomics/add:OK #3/2 arena_atomics/sub:OK #3/3 arena_atomics/and:OK #3/4 arena_atomics/or:OK #3/5 arena_atomics/xor:OK #3/6 arena_atomics/cmpxchg:OK #3/7 arena_atomics/xchg:OK #3 arena_atomics:OK #10/1 atomics/add:OK #10/2 atomics/sub:OK #10/3 atomics/and:OK #10/4 atomics/or:OK #10/5 atomics/xor:OK #10/6 atomics/cmpxchg:OK #10/7 atomics/xchg:OK #10 atomics:OK Summary: 2/14 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240426161116.441-1-puranjay@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-07Merge branch 'libbpf: further struct_ops fixes and improvements'Martin KaFai Lau5-17/+156
Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== Fix yet another case of mishandling SEC("struct_ops") programs that were nulled out programmatically through BPF skeleton by the user. While at it, add some improvements around detecting and reporting errors, specifically a common case of declaring SEC("struct_ops") program, but forgetting to actually make use of it by setting it as a callback implementation in SEC(".struct_ops") variable (i.e., map) declaration. A bunch of new selftests are added as well. ==================== Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-07selftests/bpf: shorten subtest names for struct_ops_module testAndrii Nakryiko1-4/+4
Drive-by clean up, we shouldn't use meaningless "test_" prefix for subtest names. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507001335.1445325-8-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-07selftests/bpf: validate struct_ops early failure detection logicAndrii Nakryiko2-0/+64
Add a simple test that validates that libbpf will reject isolated struct_ops program early with helpful warning message. Also validate that explicit use of such BPF program through BPF skeleton after BPF object is open won't trigger any warnings. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507001335.1445325-7-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-07libbpf: improve early detection of doomed-to-fail BPF program loadingAndrii Nakryiko1-1/+14
Extend libbpf's pre-load checks for BPF programs, detecting more typical conditions that are destinated to cause BPF program failure. This is an opportunity to provide more helpful and actionable error message to users, instead of potentially very confusing BPF verifier log and/or error. In this case, we detect struct_ops BPF program that was not referenced anywhere, but still attempted to be loaded (according to libbpf logic). Suggest that the program might need to be used in some struct_ops variable. User will get a message of the following kind: libbpf: prog 'test_1_forgotten': SEC("struct_ops") program isn't referenced anywhere, did you forget to use it? Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507001335.1445325-6-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-07libbpf: fix libbpf_strerror_r() handling unknown errorsAndrii Nakryiko1-2/+14
strerror_r(), used from libbpf-specific libbpf_strerror_r() wrapper is documented to return error in two different ways, depending on glibc version. Take that into account when handling strerror_r()'s own errors, which happens when we pass some non-standard (internal) kernel error to it. Before this patch we'd have "ERROR: strerror_r(524)=22", which is quite confusing. Now for the same situation we'll see a bit less visually scary "unknown error (-524)". At least we won't confuse user with irrelevant EINVAL (22). Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507001335.1445325-5-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-07selftests/bpf: add another struct_ops callback use case testAndrii Nakryiko2-0/+49
Add a test which tests the case that was just fixed. Kernel has full type information about callback, but user explicitly nulls out the reference to declaratively set BPF program reference. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507001335.1445325-4-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-07libbpf: handle yet another corner case of nulling out struct_ops programAndrii Nakryiko1-1/+9
There is yet another corner case where user can set STRUCT_OPS program reference in STRUCT_OPS map to NULL, but libbpf will fail to disable autoload for such BPF program. This time it's the case of "new" kernel which has type information about callback field, but user explicitly nulled-out program reference from user-space after opening BPF object. Fix, hopefully, the last remaining unhandled case. Fixes: 0737df6de946 ("libbpf: better fix for handling nulled-out struct_ops program") Fixes: f973fccd43d3 ("libbpf: handle nulled-out program in struct_ops correctly") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507001335.1445325-3-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-07libbpf: remove unnecessary struct_ops prog validity checkAndrii Nakryiko1-10/+3
libbpf ensures that BPF program references set in map->st_ops->progs[i] during open phase are always valid STRUCT_OPS programs. This is done in bpf_object__collect_st_ops_relos(). So there is no need to double-check that in bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops(). Simplify the code by removing unnecessary check. Also, we avoid using local prog variable to keep code similar to the upcoming fix, which adds similar logic in another part of bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops(). Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507001335.1445325-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-07Merge branch 'fix-number-of-arguments-in-test'Andrii Nakryiko2-14/+30
Cupertino Miranda says: ==================== Fix number of arguments in test Hi everyone, This is a new version based on comments. Regards, Cupertino Changes from v1: - Comment with gcc-bpf replaced by bpf_gcc. - Used pragma GCC optimize to disable GCC optimization in test. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com> Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com> ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507122220.207820-1-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-05-07selftests/bpf: Change functions definitions to support GCCCupertino Miranda1-6/+21
The test_xdp_noinline.c contains 2 functions that use more then 5 arguments. This patch collapses the 2 last arguments in an array. Also in GCC and ipa_sra optimization increases the number of arguments used in function encap_v4. This pass disables the optimization for that particular file. Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240507122220.207820-3-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
2024-05-07selftests/bpf: Add CFLAGS per source file and runnerCupertino Miranda1-8/+9
This patch adds support to specify CFLAGS per source file and per test runner. Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240507122220.207820-2-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
2024-05-07bpf: Temporarily define BPF_NO_PRESEVE_ACCESS_INDEX for GCCJose E. Marchesi1-1/+1
The vmlinux.h file generated by bpftool makes use of compiler pragmas in order to install the CO-RE preserve_access_index in all the struct types derived from the BTF info: #ifndef __VMLINUX_H__ #define __VMLINUX_H__ #ifndef BPF_NO_PRESERVE_ACCESS_INDEX #pragma clang attribute push (__attribute__((preserve_access_index)), apply_t = record #endif [... type definitions generated from kernel BTF ... ] #ifndef BPF_NO_PRESERVE_ACCESS_INDEX #pragma clang attribute pop #endif The `clang attribute push/pop' pragmas are specific to clang/llvm and are not supported by GCC. At the moment the BTF dumping services in libbpf do not support dicriminating between types dumped because they are directly referred and types dumped because they are dependencies. A suitable API is being worked now. See [1] and [2]. In the interim, this patch changes the selftests/bpf Makefile so it passes -DBPF_NO_PRESERVE_ACCESS_INDEX to GCC when it builds the selftests. This workaround is temporary, and may have an impact on the results of the GCC-built tests. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240503111836.25275-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com/T/#u [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240504205510.24785-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com/T/#u Tested in bpf-next master. No regressions. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240507095011.15867-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com
2024-05-07Merge branch 'bpf-avoid-attribute-ignored-warnings-in-gcc'Andrii Nakryiko2-2/+2
Jose E. Marchesi says: ==================== bpf: avoid `attribute ignored' warnings in GCC These two patches avoid warnings (turned into errors) when building the BPF selftests with GCC. [Changes from V1: - As requested by reviewer, an additional patch has been added in order to remove __hidden from the `private' macro in cpumask_common.h. - Typo bening -> benign fixed in the commit message of the second patch.] ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507074227.4523-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-05-07bpf: Disable some `attribute ignored' warnings in GCCJose E. Marchesi1-1/+1
This patch modifies selftests/bpf/Makefile to pass -Wno-attributes to GCC. This is because of the following attributes which are ignored: - btf_decl_tag - btf_type_tag There are many of these. At the moment none of these are recognized/handled by gcc-bpf. We are aware that btf_decl_tag is necessary for some of the selftest harness to communicate test failure/success. Support for it is in progress in GCC upstream: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/650482.html However, the GCC master branch is not yet open, so the series above (currently under review upstream) wont be able to make it there until 14.1 gets released, probably mid next week. As for btf_type_tag, more extensive work will be needed in GCC upstream to support it in both BTF and DWARF. We have a WIP big patch for that, but that is not needed to compile/build the selftests. - used There are SEC macros defined in the selftests as: #define SEC(N) __attribute__((section(N),used)) The SEC macro is used for both functions and global variables. According to the GCC documentation `used' attribute is really only meaningful for functions, and it warns when the attribute is used for other global objects, like for example ctl_array in test_xdp_noinline.c. Ignoring this is benign. - align_value In progs/test_cls_redirect.c:127 there is: typedef uint8_t *net_ptr __attribute__((align_value(8))); GCC warns that it is ignoring this attribute, because it is not implemented by GCC. I think ignoring this attribute in GCC is benign, because according to the clang documentation [1] its purpose seems to be merely declarative and doesn't seem to translate into extra checks at run-time, only to perhaps better optimized code ("runtime behavior is undefined if the pointed memory object is not aligned to the specified alignment"). [1] https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#align-value Tested in bpf-next master. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240507074227.4523-3-jose.marchesi@oracle.com
2024-05-07bpf: Avoid __hidden__ attribute in static objectJose E. Marchesi1-1/+1
An object defined as `static' defaults to hidden visibility. If additionally the visibility(__weak__) compiler attribute is applied to the declaration of the object, GCC warns that the attribute gets ignored. This patch removes the only instance of this problem among the BPF selftests. Tested in bpf-next master. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240507074227.4523-2-jose.marchesi@oracle.com
2024-05-07bpf: Remove redundant page mask of vmf->addressHaiyue Wang1-1/+1
As the comment described in "struct vm_fault": ".address" : 'Faulting virtual address - masked' ".real_address" : 'Faulting virtual address - unmasked' The link [1] said: "Whatever the routes, all architectures end up to the invocation of handle_mm_fault() which, in turn, (likely) ends up calling __handle_mm_fault() to carry out the actual work of allocating the page tables." __handle_mm_fault() does address assignment: .address = address & PAGE_MASK, .real_address = address, This is debug dump by running `./test_progs -a "*arena*"`: [ 69.767494] arena fault: vmf->address = 10000001d000, vmf->real_address = 10000001d008 [ 69.767496] arena fault: vmf->address = 10000001c000, vmf->real_address = 10000001c008 [ 69.767499] arena fault: vmf->address = 10000001b000, vmf->real_address = 10000001b008 [ 69.767501] arena fault: vmf->address = 10000001a000, vmf->real_address = 10000001a008 [ 69.767504] arena fault: vmf->address = 100000019000, vmf->real_address = 100000019008 [ 69.769388] arena fault: vmf->address = 10000001e000, vmf->real_address = 10000001e1e8 So we can use the value of 'vmf->address' to do BPF arena kernel address space cast directly. [1] https://docs.kernel.org/mm/page_tables.html Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507063358.8048-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-06Merge branch 'bpf-verifier-range-computation-improvements'Alexei Starovoitov2-65/+104
Cupertino Miranda says: ==================== bpf/verifier: range computation improvements Hi everyone, This is what I hope to be the last version. :) Regards, Cupertino Changes from v1: - Reordered patches in the series. - Fix refactor to be acurate with original code. - Fixed other mentioned small problems. Changes from v2: - Added a patch to replace mark_reg_unknowon for __mark_reg_unknown in the context of range computation. - Reverted implementation of refactor to v1 which used a simpler boolean return value in check function. - Further relaxed MUL to allow it to still compute a range when neither of its registers is a known value. - Simplified tests based on Eduards example. - Added messages in selftest commits. Changes from v3: - Improved commit message of patch nr 1. - Coding style fixes. - Improve XOR and OR tests. - Made function calls to pass struct bpf_reg_state pointer instead. - Improved final code as a last patch. Changes from v4: - Merged patch nr 7 in 2. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-1-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-06selftests/bpf: MUL range computation tests.Cupertino Miranda1-0/+21
Added a test for bound computation in MUL when non constant values are used and both registers have bounded ranges. Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com> Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-7-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-06bpf/verifier: relax MUL range computation checkCupertino Miranda1-5/+1
MUL instruction required that src_reg would be a known value (i.e. src_reg would be a const value). The condition in this case can be relaxed, since the range computation algorithm used in current code already supports a proper range computation for any valid range value on its operands. Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com> Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-6-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-06selftests/bpf: XOR and OR range computation tests.Cupertino Miranda1-0/+42
Added a test for bound computation in XOR and OR when non constant values are used and both registers have bounded ranges. Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com> Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-5-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-06bpf/verifier: improve XOR and OR range computationCupertino Miranda1-2/+2
Range for XOR and OR operators would not be attempted unless src_reg would resolve to a single value, i.e. a known constant value. This condition is unnecessary, and the following XOR/OR operator handling could compute a possible better range. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com> Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-4-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-06bpf/verifier: refactor checks for range computationCupertino Miranda1-64/+45
Split range computation checks in its own function, isolating pessimitic range set for dst_reg and failing return to a single point. Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com> Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> bpf/verifier: improve code after range computation recent changes. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-3-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-06bpf/verifier: replace calls to mark_reg_unknown.Cupertino Miranda1-5/+4
In order to further simplify the code in adjust_scalar_min_max_vals all the calls to mark_reg_unknown are replaced by __mark_reg_unknown. static void mark_reg_unknown(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) { if (WARN_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG)) { ... mark all regs not init ... return; } __mark_reg_unknown(env, regs + regno); } The 'regno >= MAX_BPF_REG' does not apply to adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(), because it is only called from the following stack: - check_alu_op - adjust_reg_min_max_vals - adjust_scalar_min_max_vals The check_alu_op() does check_reg_arg() which verifies that both src and dst register numbers are within bounds. Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com> Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-2-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-06bpftool, selftests/hid/bpf: Fix 29 clang warningsJohn Hubbard1-1/+1
When building either tools/bpf/bpftool, or tools/testing/selftests/hid, (the same Makefile is used for these), clang generates many instances of the following: "clang: warning: -lLLVM-17: 'linker' input unused" Quentin points out that the LLVM version is only required in $(LIBS), not in $(CFLAGS), so the fix is to remove it from CFLAGS. Suggested-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240505230054.13813-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com
2024-05-06selftests/bpf: Fix pointer arithmetic in test_xdp_do_redirectMichal Schmidt1-2/+2
Cast operation has a higher precedence than addition. The code here wants to zero the 2nd half of the 64-bit metadata, but due to a pointer arithmetic mistake, it writes the zero at offset 16 instead. Just adding parentheses around "data + 4" would fix this, but I think this will be slightly better readable with array syntax. I was unable to test this with tools/testing/selftests/bpf/vmtest.sh, because my glibc is newer than glibc in the provided VM image. So I just checked the difference in the compiled code. objdump -S tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_do_redirect.test.o: - *((__u32 *)data) = 0x42; /* metadata test value */ + ((__u32 *)data)[0] = 0x42; /* metadata test value */ be7: 48 8d 85 30 fc ff ff lea -0x3d0(%rbp),%rax bee: c7 00 42 00 00 00 movl $0x42,(%rax) - *((__u32 *)data + 4) = 0; + ((__u32 *)data)[1] = 0; bf4: 48 8d 85 30 fc ff ff lea -0x3d0(%rbp),%rax - bfb: 48 83 c0 10 add $0x10,%rax + bfb: 48 83 c0 04 add $0x4,%rax bff: c7 00 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,(%rax) Fixes: 5640b6d89434 ("selftests/bpf: fix "metadata marker" getting overwritten by the netstack") Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240506145023.214248-1-mschmidt@redhat.com
2024-05-06selftests/bpf: Use bpf_tracing.h instead of bpf_tcp_helpers.hMartin KaFai Lau4-4/+5
The bpf programs that this patch changes require the BPF_PROG macro. The BPF_PROG macro is defined in the libbpf's bpf_tracing.h. Some tests include bpf_tcp_helpers.h which includes bpf_tracing.h. They don't need other things from bpf_tcp_helpers.h other than bpf_tracing.h. This patch simplifies it by directly including the bpf_tracing.h. The motivation of this unnecessary code churn is to retire the bpf_tcp_helpers.h by directly using vmlinux.h. Right now, the main usage of the bpf_tcp_helpers.h is the partial kernel socket definitions (e.g. socket, sock, tcp_sock). While the test cases continue to grow, fields are kept adding to those partial socket definitions (e.g. the recent bpf_cc_cubic.c test which tried to extend bpf_tcp_helpers.c but eventually used the vmlinux.h instead). The idea is to retire bpf_tcp_helpers.c and consistently use vmlinux.h for the tests that require the kernel sockets. This patch tackles the obvious tests that can directly use bpf_tracing.h instead of bpf_tcp_helpers.h. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240504005045.848376-1-martin.lau@linux.dev
2024-05-02libbpf: Avoid casts from pointers to enums in bpf_tracing.hJose E. Marchesi2-47/+47
[Differences from V1: - Do not introduce a global typedef, as this is a public header. - Keep the void* casts in BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP and BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP, as these are necessary for converting to a const void* argument of bpf_probe_read_kernel.] The BPF_PROG, BPF_KPROBE and BPF_KSYSCALL macros defined in tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h use a clever hack in order to provide a convenient way to define entry points for BPF programs as if they were normal C functions that get typed actual arguments, instead of as elements in a single "context" array argument. For example, PPF_PROGS allows writing: SEC("struct_ops/cwnd_event") void BPF_PROG(cwnd_event, struct sock *sk, enum tcp_ca_event event) { bbr_cwnd_event(sk, event); dctcp_cwnd_event(sk, event); cubictcp_cwnd_event(sk, event); } That expands into a pair of functions: void ____cwnd_event (unsigned long long *ctx, struct sock *sk, enum tcp_ca_event event) { bbr_cwnd_event(sk, event); dctcp_cwnd_event(sk, event); cubictcp_cwnd_event(sk, event); } void cwnd_event (unsigned long long *ctx) { _Pragma("GCC diagnostic push") _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wint-conversion\"") return ____cwnd_event(ctx, (void*)ctx[0], (void*)ctx[1]); _Pragma("GCC diagnostic pop") } Note how the 64-bit unsigned integers in the incoming CTX get casted to a void pointer, and then implicitly converted to whatever type of the actual argument in the wrapped function. In this case: Arg1: unsigned long long -> void * -> struct sock * Arg2: unsigned long long -> void * -> enum tcp_ca_event The behavior of GCC and clang when facing such conversions differ: pointer -> pointer Allowed by the C standard. GCC: no warning nor error. clang: no warning nor error. pointer -> integer type [C standard says the result of this conversion is implementation defined, and it may lead to unaligned pointer etc.] GCC: error: integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] clang: error: incompatible pointer to integer conversion [-Wint-conversion] pointer -> enumerated type GCC: error: incompatible types in assigment (*) clang: error: incompatible pointer to integer conversion [-Wint-conversion] These macros work because converting pointers to pointers is allowed, and converting pointers to integers also works provided a suitable integer type even if it is implementation defined, much like casting a pointer to uintptr_t is guaranteed to work by the C standard. The conversion errors emitted by both compilers by default are silenced by the pragmas. However, the GCC error marked with (*) above when assigning a pointer to an enumerated value is not associated with the -Wint-conversion warning, and it is not possible to turn it off. This is preventing building the BPF kernel selftests with GCC. This patch fixes this by avoiding intermediate casts to void*, replaced with casts to `unsigned long long', which is an integer type capable of safely store a BPF pointer, much like the standard uintptr_t. Testing performed in bpf-next master: - vmtest.sh -- ./test_verifier - vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs - make M=samples/bpf No regressions. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240502170925.3194-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com
2024-05-02libbpf: Fix bpf_ksym_exists() in GCCJose E. Marchesi1-3/+14
The macro bpf_ksym_exists is defined in bpf_helpers.h as: #define bpf_ksym_exists(sym) ({ \ _Static_assert(!__builtin_constant_p(!!sym), #sym " should be marked as __weak"); \ !!sym; \ }) The purpose of the macro is to determine whether a given symbol has been defined, given the address of the object associated with the symbol. It also has a compile-time check to make sure the object whose address is passed to the macro has been declared as weak, which makes the check on `sym' meaningful. As it happens, the check for weak doesn't work in GCC in all cases, because __builtin_constant_p not always folds at parse time when optimizing. This is because optimizations that happen later in the compilation process, like inlining, may make a previously non-constant expression a constant. This results in errors like the following when building the selftests with GCC: bpf_helpers.h:190:24: error: expression in static assertion is not constant 190 | _Static_assert(!__builtin_constant_p(!!sym), #sym " should be marked as __weak"); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Fortunately recent versions of GCC support a __builtin_has_attribute that can be used to directly check for the __weak__ attribute. This patch changes bpf_helpers.h to use that builtin when building with a recent enough GCC, and to omit the check if GCC is too old to support the builtin. The macro used for GCC becomes: #define bpf_ksym_exists(sym) ({ \ _Static_assert(__builtin_has_attribute (*sym, __weak__), #sym " should be marked as __weak"); \ !!sym; \ }) Note that since bpf_ksym_exists is designed to get the address of the object associated with symbol SYM, we pass *sym to __builtin_has_attribute instead of sym. When an expression is passed to __builtin_has_attribute then it is the type of the passed expression that is checked for the specified attribute. The expression itself is not evaluated. This accommodates well with the existing usages of the macro: - For function objects: struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p) __ksym __weak; [...] bpf_ksym_exists(bpf_task_acquire) - For variable objects: extern const struct rq runqueues __ksym __weak; /* typed */ [...] bpf_ksym_exists(&runqueues) Note also that BPF support was added in GCC 10 and support for __builtin_has_attribute in GCC 9. Locally tested in bpf-next master branch. No regressions. Signed-of-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240428112559.10518-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com
2024-05-02libbpf: fix ring_buffer__consume_n() return result logicAndrii Nakryiko1-1/+1
Add INT_MAX check to ring_buffer__consume_n(). We do the similar check to handle int return result of all these ring buffer APIs in other APIs and ring_buffer__consume_n() is missing one. This patch fixes this omission. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430201952.888293-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02libbpf: fix potential overflow in ring__consume_n()Andrii Nakryiko1-1/+1
ringbuf_process_ring() return int64_t, while ring__consume_n() assigns it to int. It's highly unlikely, but possible for ringbuf_process_ring() to return value larger than INT_MAX, so use int64_t. ring__consume_n() does check INT_MAX before returning int result to the user. Fixes: 4d22ea94ea33 ("libbpf: Add ring__consume_n / ring_buffer__consume_n") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430201952.888293-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02Merge branch 'Add new args into tcp_congestion_ops' cong_control'Martin KaFai Lau8-7/+244
Miao Xu says: ==================== This patchset attempts to add two new arguments into the hookpoint cong_control in tcp_congestion_ops. The new arguments are inherited from the caller tcp_cong_control and can be used by any bpf cc prog that implements its own logic inside this hookpoint. Please review. Thanks a lot! Changelog ===== v2->v3: - Fixed the broken selftest caused by the new arguments. - Renamed the selftest file name and bpf prog name. v1->v2: - Split the patchset into 3 separate patches. - Added highlights in the selftest prog. - Removed the dependency on bpf_tcp_helpers.h. ==================== Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02selftests/bpf: Add test for the use of new args in cong_controlMiao Xu3-0/+233
This patch adds a selftest to show the usage of the new arguments in cong_control. For simplicity's sake, the testing example reuses cubic's kernel functions. Signed-off-by: Miao Xu <miaxu@meta.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240502042318.801932-4-miaxu@meta.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02bpf: tcp: Allow to write tp->snd_cwnd_stamp in bpf_tcp_caMiao Xu1-0/+3
This patch allows the write of tp->snd_cwnd_stamp in a bpf tcp ca program. An use case of writing this field is to keep track of the time whenever tp->snd_cwnd is raised or reduced inside the `cong_control` callback. Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xu <miaxu@meta.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240502042318.801932-3-miaxu@meta.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02tcp: Add new args for cong_control in tcp_congestion_opsMiao Xu5-7/+8
This patch adds two new arguments for cong_control of struct tcp_congestion_ops: - ack - flag These two arguments are inherited from the caller tcp_cong_control in tcp_intput.c. One use case of them is to update cwnd and pacing rate inside cong_control based on the info they provide. For example, the flag can be used to decide if it is the right time to raise or reduce a sender's cwnd. Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xu <miaxu@meta.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240502042318.801932-2-miaxu@meta.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02Merge branch 'selftests/bpf: Add sockaddr tests for kernel networking'Martin KaFai Lau8-341/+1193
Jordan Rife says: ==================== This patch series adds test coverage for BPF sockaddr hooks and their interactions with kernel socket functions (i.e. kernel_bind(), kernel_connect(), kernel_sendmsg(), sock_sendmsg(), kernel_getpeername(), and kernel_getsockname()) while also rounding out IPv4 and IPv6 sockaddr hook coverage in prog_tests/sock_addr.c. As with v1 of this patch series, we add regression coverage for the issues addressed by these patches, - commit 0bdf399342c5("net: Avoid address overwrite in kernel_connect") - commit 86a7e0b69bd5("net: prevent rewrite of msg_name in sock_sendmsg()") - commit c889a99a21bf("net: prevent address rewrite in kernel_bind()") - commit 01b2885d9415("net: Save and restore msg_namelen in sock_sendmsg") but broaden the focus a bit. In order to extend prog_tests/sock_addr.c to test these kernel functions, we add a set of new kfuncs that wrap individual socket operations to bpf_testmod and invoke them through set of corresponding SYSCALL programs (progs/sock_addr_kern.c). Each test case can be configured to use a different set of "sock_ops" depending on whether it is testing kernel calls (kernel_bind(), kernel_connect(), etc.) or system calls (bind(), connect(), etc.). ======= Patches ======= * Patch 1 fixes the sock_addr bind test program to work for big endian architectures such as s390x. * Patch 2 introduces the new kfuncs to bpf_testmod. * Patch 3 introduces the BPF program which allows us to invoke these kfuncs invividually from the test program. * Patch 4 lays the groundwork for IPv4 and IPv6 sockaddr hook coverage by migrating much of the environment setup logic from bpf/test_sock_addr.sh into prog_tests/sock_addr.c and moves test cases to cover bind4/6, connect4/6, sendmsg4/6 and recvmsg4/6 hooks. * Patch 5 makes the set of socket operations for each test case configurable, laying the groundwork for Patch 6. * Patch 6 introduces two sets of sock_ops that invoke the kernel equivalents of connect(), bind(), etc. and uses these to add coverage for the kernel socket functions. ======= Changes ======= v2->v3 ------ * Renamed bind helpers. Dropped "_ntoh" suffix. * Added guards to kfuncs to make sure addrlen and msglen do not exceed the buffer capacity. * Added KF_SLEEPABLE flag to kfuncs. * Added a mutex (sock_lock) to kfuncs to serialize access to sock. * Added NULL check for sock to each kfunc. * Use the "sock_addr" networking namespace for all network interface setup and testing. * Use "nodad" when calling "ip -6 addr add" during interface setup to avoid delays and remove ping loop. * Removed test cases from test_sock_addr.c to make it clear what remains to be migrated. * Removed unused parameter (expect_change) from sock_addr_op(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240412165230.2009746-1-jrife@google.com/T/#u v1->v2 ------ * Dropped test_progs/sock_addr_kern.c and the sock_addr_kern test module in favor of simply expanding bpf_testmod and test_progs/sock_addr.c. * Migrated environment setup logic from bpf/test_sock_addr.sh into prog_tests/sock_addr.c rather than invoking the script from the test program. * Added kfuncs to bpf_testmod as well as the sock_addr_kern BPF program to enable us to invoke kernel socket functions from test_progs/sock_addr.c. * Added test coverage for kernel socket functions to test_progs/sock_addr.c. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240329191907.1808635-1-jrife@google.com/T/#u ==================== Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02selftests/bpf: Add kernel socket operation testsJordan Rife1-0/+472
This patch creates two sets of sock_ops that call out to the SYSCALL hooks in the sock_addr_kern BPF program and uses them to construct test cases for the range of supported operations (kernel_connect(), kernel_bind(), kernel_sendms(), sock_sendmsg(), kernel_getsockname(), kenel_getpeername()). This ensures that these interact with BPF sockaddr hooks as intended. Beyond this it also ensures that these operations do not modify their address parameter, providing regression coverage for the issues addressed by this set of patches: - commit 0bdf399342c5("net: Avoid address overwrite in kernel_connect") - commit 86a7e0b69bd5("net: prevent rewrite of msg_name in sock_sendmsg()") - commit c889a99a21bf("net: prevent address rewrite in kernel_bind()") - commit 01b2885d9415("net: Save and restore msg_namelen in sock_sendmsg") Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429214529.2644801-7-jrife@google.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02selftests/bpf: Make sock configurable for each test caseJordan Rife1-42/+98
In order to reuse the same test code for both socket system calls (e.g. connect(), bind(), etc.) and kernel socket functions (e.g. kernel_connect(), kernel_bind(), etc.), this patch introduces the "ops" field to sock_addr_test. This field allows each test cases to configure the set of functions used in the test case to create, manipulate, and tear down a socket. Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429214529.2644801-6-jrife@google.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02selftests/bpf: Move IPv4 and IPv6 sockaddr test casesJordan Rife2-314/+268
This patch lays the groundwork for testing IPv4 and IPv6 sockaddr hooks and their interaction with both socket syscalls and kernel functions (e.g. kernel_connect, kernel_bind, etc.). It moves some of the test cases from the old-style bpf/test_sock_addr.c self test into the sock_addr prog_test in a step towards fully retiring bpf/test_sock_addr.c. We will expand the test dimensions in the sock_addr prog_test in a later patch series in order to migrate the remaining test cases. Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429214529.2644801-5-jrife@google.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02selftests/bpf: Implement BPF programs for kernel socket operationsJordan Rife1-0/+65
This patch lays out a set of SYSCALL programs that can be used to invoke the socket operation kfuncs in bpf_testmod, allowing a test program to manipulate kernel socket operations from userspace. Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429214529.2644801-4-jrife@google.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02selftests/bpf: Implement socket kfuncs for bpf_testmodJordan Rife2-0/+282
This patch adds a set of kfuncs to bpf_testmod that can be used to manipulate a socket from kernel space. Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429214529.2644801-3-jrife@google.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02selftests/bpf: Fix bind program for big endian systemsJordan Rife3-16/+39
Without this fix, the bind4 and bind6 programs will reject bind attempts on big endian systems. This patch ensures that CI tests pass for the s390x architecture. Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429214529.2644801-2-jrife@google.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-02bpf: Missing trailing slash in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/MakefileJose E. Marchesi1-1/+1
tools/lib/bpf/Makefile assumes that the patch in OUTPUT is a directory and that it includes a trailing slash. This seems to be a common expectation for OUTPUT among all the Makefiles. In the rule for runqslower in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile the variable BPFTOOL_OUTPUT is set to a directory name that lacks a trailing slash. This results in a malformed BPF_HELPER_DEFS being defined in lib/bpf/Makefile. This problem becomes evident when a file like tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h gets updated. This patch fixes the problem by adding the missing slash in the value for BPFTOOL_OUTPUT in the $(OUTPUT)/runqslower rule. Regtested by running selftests in bpf-next master and building samples/bpf programs. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240502140831.23915-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com
2024-05-02libbpf: Fix error message in attach_kprobe_multiJiri Olsa1-1/+1
We just failed to retrieve pattern, so we need to print spec instead. Fixes: ddc6b04989eb ("libbpf: Add bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts function") Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240502075541.1425761-2-jolsa@kernel.org
2024-05-02libbpf: Fix error message in attach_kprobe_sessionJiri Olsa1-1/+1
We just failed to retrieve pattern, so we need to print spec instead. Fixes: 2ca178f02b2f ("libbpf: Add support for kprobe session attach") Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240502075541.1425761-1-jolsa@kernel.org
2024-05-01bpf: crypto: fix build when CONFIG_CRYPTO=mVadim Fedorenko1-1/+1
Crypto subsytem can be build as a module. In this case we still have to build BPF crypto framework otherwise the build will fail. Fixes: 3e1c6f35409f ("bpf: make common crypto API for TC/XDP programs") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405011634.4JK40epY-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240501170130.1682309-1-vadfed@meta.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-01libbpf: better fix for handling nulled-out struct_ops programAndrii Nakryiko2-12/+27
Previous attempt to fix the handling of nulled-out (from skeleton) struct_ops program is working well only if struct_ops program is defined as non-autoloaded by default (i.e., has SEC("?struct_ops") annotation, with question mark). Unfortunately, that fix is incomplete due to how bpf_object_adjust_struct_ops_autoload() is marking referenced or non-referenced struct_ops program as autoloaded (or not). Because bpf_object_adjust_struct_ops_autoload() is run after bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops() step, which sets program slot to NULL, such programs won't be considered "referenced", and so its autoload property won't be changed. This all sounds convoluted and it is, but the desire is to have as natural behavior (as far as struct_ops usage is concerned) as possible. This fix is redoing the original fix but makes it work for autoloaded-by-default struct_ops programs as well. We achieve this by forcing prog->autoload to false if prog was declaratively set for some struct_ops map, but then nulled-out from skeleton (programmatically). This achieves desired effect of not autoloading it. If such program is still referenced somewhere else (different struct_ops map or different callback field), it will get its autoload property adjusted by bpf_object_adjust_struct_ops_autoload() later. We also fix selftest, which accidentally used SEC("?struct_ops") annotation. It was meant to use autoload-by-default program from the very beginning. Fixes: f973fccd43d3 ("libbpf: handle nulled-out program in struct_ops correctly") Cc: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240501041706.3712608-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-05-01Merge branch 'libbpf-support-module-function-syntax-for-tracing-programs'Andrii Nakryiko3-9/+55
Viktor Malik says: ==================== libbpf: support "module:function" syntax for tracing programs In some situations, it is useful to explicitly specify a kernel module to search for a tracing program target (e.g. when a function of the same name exists in multiple modules or in vmlinux). This change enables that by allowing the "module:function" syntax for the find_kernel_btf_id function. Thanks to this, the syntax can be used both from a SEC macro (i.e. `SEC(fentry/module:function)`) and via the bpf_program__set_attach_target API call. --- Changes in v2: - stylistic changes (suggested by Andrii) - added Andrii's ack to the second patch ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1714469650.git.vmalik@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-05-01selftests/bpf: add tests for the "module: Function" syntaxViktor Malik2-0/+29
The previous patch added support for the "module:function" syntax for tracing programs. This adds tests for explicitly specifying the module name via the SEC macro and via the bpf_program__set_attach_target call. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/8a076168ed847f7c8a6c25715737b1fea84e38be.1714469650.git.vmalik@redhat.com
2024-05-01libbpf: support "module: Function" syntax for tracing programsViktor Malik1-9/+26
In some situations, it is useful to explicitly specify a kernel module to search for a tracing program target (e.g. when a function of the same name exists in multiple modules or in vmlinux). This patch enables that by allowing the "module:function" syntax for the find_kernel_btf_id function. Thanks to this, the syntax can be used both from a SEC macro (i.e. `SEC(fentry/module:function)`) and via the bpf_program__set_attach_target API call. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9085a8cb9a552de98e554deb22ff7e977d025440.1714469650.git.vmalik@redhat.com