| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Aligning with other messages printed in sched_show_task() - use KERN_INFO
to print the backtrace.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Segall <[email protected]>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Print the stack trace with KERN_EMERG - it should be always visible.
Playing with console_loglevel is a bad idea as there may be more messages
printed than wanted. Also the stack trace might be not printed at all if
printk() was deferred and console_loglevel was raised back before the
trace got flushed.
Unfortunately, after rebasing on commit 2277b492582d ("kdb: Fix stack
crawling on 'running' CPUs that aren't the master"), kdb_show_stack() uses
now kdb_dump_stack_on_cpu(), which for now won't be converted as it uses
dump_stack() instead of show_stack().
Convert for now the branch that uses show_stack() and remove
console_loglevel exercise from that case.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
Cc: Jason Wessel <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Aligning with other watchdog messages just before panic - use KERN_EMERG.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
It's under CONFIG_IOMMU_LEAK option which is enabled by debug config.
Likely the backtrace is worth to be seen - so aligning with log level of
error message in iommu_full().
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Show the stack trace on a CPU with the same log level as "CPU%d" header.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Zankel <[email protected]>
Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to show_trace() as a preparation for introducing
show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
[[email protected]: build fix]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Zankel <[email protected]>
Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Keep log_lvl const show_trace_log_lvl() and printk_stack_address() as the
new generic show_stack_loglvl() wants to have a proper const qualifier.
And gcc rightfully produces warnings in case it's not keept:
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c: In function `show_stack':
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:294:37: warning: passing argument 4 of `show_trace_log_lv ' discards `const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
294 | show_trace_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, loglvl);
| ^~~~~~
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:163:32: note: expected `char *' but argument is of type `const char *'
163 | unsigned long *stack, char *log_lvl)
| ~~~~~~^~~~~~~
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
As a nice side-effect - print backtrace in __die() with the same log level
as the rest of function.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level parameter to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing
show_stack_loglvl()
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
The pmode parameter isn't used in assembly - remove it. Second argument
will be reused for printk() log level.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
`sp' is a needless excercise here.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level parameter to show_trace() as a preparation to introduce
show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to printk_address() as a preparation to introduce
show_stack_loglvl().
As a good side-effect show_fault_oops() now prints the address with
KERN_EMREG as the rest of output, making sure there won't be situation
where "PC: " is printed without actual address.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently `data' is always an empty line "". No need for additional
printk() call.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to dump_mem() as a preparation to introduce
show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> (powerpc)
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]>
Cc: Stafford Horne <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Greentime Hu <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Chen <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: James Hogan <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Burton <[email protected]>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level parameter to microblaze_unwind() as a preparation to add
show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to microblaze_unwind_inner() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to ia64_do_show_stack() as a preparation to
introduce show_stack_loglvl(). Also, make ia64_do_show_stack() static as
it's not used outside.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
As a good side-effect die() now prints the stacktrace with KERN_EMERG
aligned with other messages.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Brian Cain <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Now that c_backtrace() always emits correct loglvl, use it for printing.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().
As a good side-effect __die() now prints not only "Stack:" header with
KERN_EMERG, but the backtrace itself.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to unwind_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().
As a good side-effect arm_syscall() is now printing errors with the same
log level as the backtrace.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing
show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
As a good side-effect header "Stack Trace:" is now printed with the same
log level as the rest of backtrace.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Patch series "Add log level to show_stack()", v3.
Add log level argument to show_stack().
Done in three stages:
1. Introducing show_stack_loglvl() for every architecture
2. Migrating old users with an explicit log level
3. Renaming show_stack_loglvl() into show_stack()
Justification:
- It's a design mistake to move a business-logic decision into platform
realization detail.
- I have currently two patches sets that would benefit from this work:
Removing console_loglevel jumps in sysrq driver [1] Hung task warning
before panic [2] - suggested by Tetsuo (but he probably didn't realise
what it would involve).
- While doing (1), (2) the backtraces were adjusted to headers and other
messages for each situation - so there won't be a situation when the
backtrace is printed, but the headers are missing because they have
lesser log level (or the reverse).
- As the result in (2) plays with console_loglevel for kdb are removed.
The least important for upstream, but maybe still worth to note that every
company I've worked in so far had an off-list patch to print backtrace
with the needed log level (but only for the architecture they cared
about). If you have other ideas how you will benefit from show_stack()
with a log level - please, reply to this cover letter.
See also discussion on v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/
This patch (of 50):
print_ip_sym() needs to have a log level parameter to comply with other
parts being printed. Otherwise, half of the expected backtrace would be
printed and other may be missing with some logging level.
The following callee(s) are using now the adjusted log level:
- microblaze/unwind: the same level as headers & userspace unwind.
Note that pr_debug()'s there are for debugging the unwinder itself.
- nds32/traps: symbol addresses are printed with the same log level
as backtrace headers.
- lockdep: ip for locking issues is printed with the same log level
as other part of the warning.
- sched: ip where preemption was disabled is printed as error like
the rest part of the message.
- ftrace: bug reports are now consistent in the log level being used.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Segall <[email protected]>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]>
Cc: Greentime Hu <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: James Hogan <[email protected]>
Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Burton <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Chen <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Cc: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]>
Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Cain <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]>
Cc: Stafford Horne <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Zankel <[email protected]>
Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]>
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Cc: Jason Wessel <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 srbds fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
"The 9th episode of the dime novel "The performance killer" with the
subtitle "Slow Randomizing Boosts Denial of Service".
SRBDS is an MDS-like speculative side channel that can leak bits from
the random number generator (RNG) across cores and threads. New
microcode serializes the processor access during the execution of
RDRAND and RDSEED. This ensures that the shared buffer is overwritten
before it is released for reuse. This is equivalent to a full bus
lock, which means that many threads running the RNG instructions in
parallel have the same effect as the same amount of threads issuing a
locked instruction targeting an address which requires locking of two
cachelines at once.
The mitigation support comes with the usual pile of unpleasant
ingredients:
- command line options
- sysfs file
- microcode checks
- a list of vulnerable CPUs identified by model and stepping this
time which requires stepping match support for the cpu match logic.
- the inevitable slowdown of affected CPUs"
* branch 'x86/srbds' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/speculation: Add Ivy Bridge to affected list
x86/speculation: Add SRBDS vulnerability and mitigation documentation
x86/speculation: Add Special Register Buffer Data Sampling (SRBDS) mitigation
x86/cpu: Add 'table' argument to cpu_matches()
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andersson/remoteproc
Pull remoteproc updates from Bjorn Andersson:
"This introduces device managed versions of functions used to register
remoteproc devices, add support for remoteproc driver specific
resource control, enables remoteproc drivers to specify ELF class and
machine for coredumps. It integrates pm_runtime in the core for
keeping resources active while the remote is booted and holds a wake
source while recoverying a remote processor after a firmware crash.
It refactors the remoteproc device's allocation path to simplify the
logic, fix a few cleanup bugs and to not clone const strings onto the
heap. Debugfs code is simplifies using the DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE and a
zero-length array is replaced with flexible-array.
A new remoteproc driver for the JZ47xx VPU is introduced, the Qualcomm
SM8250 gains support for audio, compute and sensor remoteprocs and the
Qualcomm SC7180 modem support is cleaned up and improved.
The Qualcomm glink subsystem-restart driver is merged into the main
glink driver, the Qualcomm sysmon driver is extended to properly
notify remote processors about all other remote processors' state
transitions"
* tag 'rproc-v5.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andersson/remoteproc: (43 commits)
remoteproc: Fix an error code in devm_rproc_alloc()
MAINTAINERS: Add myself as reviewer for Ingenic rproc driver
remoteproc: ingenic: Added remoteproc driver
remoteproc: Add support for runtime PM
dt-bindings: Document JZ47xx VPU auxiliary processor
remoteproc: wcss: Fix arguments passed to qcom_add_glink_subdev()
remoteproc: Fix and restore the parenting hierarchy for vdev
remoteproc: Fall back to using parent memory pool if no dedicated available
remoteproc: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
remoteproc: wcss: add support for rpmsg communication
remoteproc: core: Prevent system suspend during remoteproc recovery
remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Remove unused q6v5_da_to_va function
remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: map/unmap mpss segments before/after use
remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Drop accesses to MPSS PERPH register space
dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Replace halt-nav with spare-regs
remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add SM8250 PAS remoteprocs
dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add SM8250 remoteprocs
remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Extract mba/mpss from memory-region
dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Use memory-region to reference memory
remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add SC7180 Modem support
...
|