aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-10-26drm/amd/display: adding ddc_gpio_vga_reg_list to ddc reg def'nsMartin Leung1-0/+12
why: oem-related ddc read/write fails without these regs how: copy from hw_factory_dcn20.c Signed-off-by: Martin Leung <[email protected]> Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
2020-10-26scsi: ibmvscsi: Fix potential race after loss of transportTyrel Datwyler1-10/+26
After a loss of transport due to an adapter migration or crash/disconnect from the host partner there is a tiny window where we can race adjusting the request_limit of the adapter. The request limit is atomically increased/decreased to track the number of inflight requests against the allowed limit of our VIOS partner. After a transport loss we set the request_limit to zero to reflect this state. However, there is a window where the adapter may attempt to queue a command because the transport loss event hasn't been fully processed yet and request_limit is still greater than zero. The hypercall to send the event will fail and the error path will increment the request_limit as a result. If the adapter processes the transport event prior to this increment the request_limit becomes out of sync with the adapter state and can result in SCSI commands being submitted on the now reset connection prior to an SRP Login resulting in a protocol violation. Fix this race by protecting request_limit with the host lock when changing the value via atomic_set() to indicate no transport. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>
2020-10-26dt-bindings: Another round of adding missing ↵Rob Herring17-0/+39
'additionalProperties/unevalutatedProperties' Another round of wack-a-mole. The json-schema default is additional unknown properties are allowed, but for DT all properties should be defined. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
2020-10-26dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in board/SoC schemasRob Herring62-0/+146
In order to add meta-schema checks for additional/unevaluatedProperties being present, all schema need to make this explicit. As the top-level board/SoC schemas always have additional properties, add 'additionalProperties: true'. Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
2020-10-26dt-bindings: More whitespace clean-ups in schema filesRob Herring34-219/+223
Clean-up incorrect indentation, extra spaces, and missing EOF newline in schema files. Most of the clean-ups are for list indentation which should always be 2 spaces more than the preceding keyword. Found with yamllint (now integrated into the checks). Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> # for I2C Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]> # for display Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> #for-iio Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
2020-10-26mfd: google,cros-ec: add missing propertiesRicardo Cañuelo2-10/+64
Add missing properties that are currently used in the examples of subnode bindings and in many DTs. Also updates the example in sound/google,cros-ec-codec.yaml to comply with the google,cros-ec binding. Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Cañuelo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [robh: Add missing '#address-cells' and '#size-cells'] Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
2020-10-26dt-bindings: input: convert cros-ec-keyb to json-schemaRicardo Cañuelo3-72/+95
Convert the google,cros-ec-keyb binding to YAML and add it as a property of google,cros-ec.yaml Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Cañuelo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
2020-10-26dt-bindings: i2c: convert i2c-cros-ec-tunnel to json-schemaRicardo Cañuelo3-39/+71
Convert the google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel binding to YAML and add it as a property of google,cros-ec.yaml. Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Cañuelo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [robh: add ref to i2c-controller.yaml] Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
2020-10-26drm/amd/display: prevent null pointer accessDmytro Laktyushkin1-5/+7
Prevent null pointer access when checking odm tree. Signed-off-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <[email protected]> Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>
2020-10-26drm/amdgpu: increase the reserved VM size to 2MBChristian König1-2/+2
Ideally this should be a multiple of the VM block size. 2MB should at least fit for Vega/Navi. Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Madhav Chauhan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]
2020-10-26drm/amd/display: Fixed panic during seamless boot.David Galiffi1-1/+2
[why] get_pixel_clk_frequency_100hz is undefined in clock_source_funcs. [how] set function pointer: ".get_pixel_clk_frequency_100hz = get_pixel_clk_frequency_100hz" Signed-off-by: David Galiffi <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <[email protected]> Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
2020-10-26drm/amdgpu: don't map BO in reserved regionMadhav Chauhan1-0/+10
2MB area is reserved at top inside VM. Suggested-by: Christian König <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Madhav Chauhan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]
2020-10-26drm/amdgpu: add DID for navi10 blockchain SKUTianci.Yin1-0/+1
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Guchun Chen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tianci.Yin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
2020-10-26drm/amdgpu: disable DCN and VCN for navi10 blockchain SKU(v3)Tianci.Yin1-2/+12
The blockchain SKU has no display and video support, remove them. Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tianci.Yin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
2020-10-26scsi: mptfusion: Fix null pointer dereferences in mptscsih_remove()Helge Deller1-5/+8
The mptscsih_remove() function triggers a kernel oops if the Scsi_Host pointer (ioc->sh) is NULL, as can be seen in this syslog: ioc0: LSI53C1030 B2: Capabilities={Initiator,Target} Begin: Waiting for root file system ... scsi host2: error handler thread failed to spawn, error = -4 mptspi: ioc0: WARNING - Unable to register controller with SCSI subsystem Backtrace: [<000000001045b7cc>] mptspi_probe+0x248/0x3d0 [mptspi] [<0000000040946470>] pci_device_probe+0x1ac/0x2d8 [<0000000040add668>] really_probe+0x1bc/0x988 [<0000000040ade704>] driver_probe_device+0x160/0x218 [<0000000040adee24>] device_driver_attach+0x160/0x188 [<0000000040adef90>] __driver_attach+0x144/0x320 [<0000000040ad7c78>] bus_for_each_dev+0xd4/0x158 [<0000000040adc138>] driver_attach+0x4c/0x80 [<0000000040adb3ec>] bus_add_driver+0x3e0/0x498 [<0000000040ae0130>] driver_register+0xf4/0x298 [<00000000409450c4>] __pci_register_driver+0x78/0xa8 [<000000000007d248>] mptspi_init+0x18c/0x1c4 [mptspi] This patch adds the necessary NULL-pointer checks. Successfully tested on a HP C8000 parisc workstation with buggy SCSI drives. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>
2020-10-26Merge series " [PATCH v2 0/5]" from Dmitry Baryshkov ↵Mark Brown2-6/+104
<[email protected]>: On SM8250 MDSS_GDSC (and the rest of display clock controller) is supplied power by MMCX power domain. Handle this link in GDSC code by binding the power domain in dts file. This patchset depends on [1] Changes since v1: - Define fixed-regulator-domain regulator using power domain performance state for enabling/disabling. - Rework to use new fixed regulator type (fixed-regulator-domain) instead of controlling power domain directly from gdsc code. Changes since RFC: - Fix naming of gdsc_supply_on/gdsc_supply_off functions - Fix detaching of solo gdsc's power domain in error handling code - Drop the dts patch, as respective display nodes are still not submitted to the mailing list. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
2020-10-26regulator: lp872x: make a const array static, makes object smallerColin Ian King1-1/+1
Don't populate const array lp872x_num_regulators on the stack but instead make it static. Makes the object code smaller by 29 bytes. Before: text data bss dec hex filename 18441 4624 64 23129 5a59 drivers/regulator/lp872x.o After: text data bss dec hex filename 18316 4720 64 23100 5a3c drivers/regulator/lp872x.o (gcc version 10.2.0) Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2020-10-26regulator: fixed: provide bindings using power domainDmitry Baryshkov1-0/+47
Define bindings for fixed regulator using power domain performance state to enable/disable corresponding regulator. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2020-10-26regulator: fixed: support using power domain for enable/disableDmitry Baryshkov1-6/+57
Adds possibility to choose the compatible "fixed-regulator-domain" for regulators which use power domain for enabling/disabling corresponding regulator. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2020-10-26Merge existing fixes from regulator/for-5.10Mark Brown1-0/+8
2020-10-26scsi: qla2xxx: Return EBUSY on fcport deletionDaniel Wagner1-2/+4
When the fcport is about to be deleted we should return EBUSY instead of ENODEV. Only for EBUSY will the request be requeued in a multipath setup. Also return EBUSY when the firmware has not yet started to avoid dropping the request. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Arun Easi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>
2020-10-26scsi: core: Don't start concurrent async scan on same hostMing Lei1-3/+4
The current scanning mechanism is supposed to fall back to a synchronous host scan if an asynchronous scan is in progress. However, this rule isn't strictly respected, scsi_prep_async_scan() doesn't hold scan_mutex when checking shost->async_scan. When scsi_scan_host() is called concurrently, two async scans on same host can be started and a hang in do_scan_async() is observed. Fixes this issue by checking & setting shost->async_scan atomically with shost->scan_mutex. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Cc: Ewan D. Milne <[email protected]> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Cc: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>
2020-10-26Merge branch 'linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-0/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6 Pull crypto fix from Herbert Xu: "This fixes a regression in x86/poly1305" * 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6: crypto: x86/poly1305 - add back a needed assignment
2020-10-26cachefiles: Handle readpage error correctlyMatthew Wilcox (Oracle)1-1/+2
If ->readpage returns an error, it has already unlocked the page. Fixes: 5e929b33c393 ("CacheFiles: Handle truncate unlocking the page we're reading") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-10-26Merge tag 's390-5.10-2' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-2/+2
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux Pull s390 fix from Heiko Carstens: "Fix s390 compile breakage caused by commit 33def8498fdd ("treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")")" * tag 's390-5.10-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux: s390: correct __bootdata / __bootdata_preserved macros
2020-10-26Merge tag 'imx-fixes-5.10' of ↵Arnd Bergmann3-0/+3
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux into arm/fixes i.MX fixes for 5.10: With commit 12d16b397ce0 ("gpio: mxc: Support module build") in place, GPIO_MXC has no 'def_bool y' anymore, and needs to be enabled by defconfig. It updates the defconfig files to explicitly enable the option for fixing boot failure on i.MX platform. * tag 'imx-fixes-5.10' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux: ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Build in CONFIG_GPIO_MXC by default ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Build in CONFIG_GPIO_MXC by default arm64: defconfig: Build in CONFIG_GPIO_MXC by default Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026135601.GA32675@dragon Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
2020-10-26btrfs: add a helper to read the tree_root commit root for backref lookupJosef Bacik3-41/+114
I got the following lockdep splat with tree locks converted to rwsem patches on btrfs/104: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ #102 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/903 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8e7fab6ffe30 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 caching_thread+0x53/0x5a0 btrfs_work_helper+0xfa/0x520 process_one_work+0x238/0x540 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #2 (&caching_ctl->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x1e0/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &caching_ctl->mutex --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&caching_ctl->mutex); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/903: #0: ffff8e7fab628838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff8e7faadac640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 903 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #102 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 BTRFS info (device sdb): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device sdb): has skinny extents This happens because qgroups does a backref lookup when we create a delayed ref. From here it may have to look up a root from an indirect ref, which does a normal lookup on the tree_root, which takes the read lock on the tree_root nodes. To fix this we need to add a variant for looking up roots that searches the commit root of the tree_root. Then when we do the backref search using the commit root we are sure to not take any locks on the tree_root nodes. This gets rid of the lockdep splat when running btrfs/104. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
2020-10-26btrfs: drop the path before adding qgroup items when enabling qgroupsJosef Bacik1-0/+18
When enabling qgroups we walk the tree_root and then add a qgroup item for every root that we have. This creates a lock dependency on the tree_root and qgroup_root, which results in the following lockdep splat (with tree locks using rwsem), eg. in tests btrfs/017 or btrfs/022: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1299 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/24552 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9142dfc5f630 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_item+0x6e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_create_tree+0x1cb/0x240 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0xcd/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30 validate_chain+0x491/0x750 __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-quota-00); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-quota-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs/24552: #0: ffff9142df431478 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0xa0 #1: ffff9142f9b10cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0x7b/0xe0 [btrfs] #2: ffff9142f9b11a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0x790 [btrfs] #3: ffff9142df431698 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x406/0x510 [btrfs] #4: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 24552 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1299 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30 validate_chain+0x491/0x750 __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x140 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] ? btrfs_root_node+0xd9/0x200 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fix this by dropping the path whenever we find a root item, add the qgroup item, and then re-lookup the root item we found and continue processing roots. Reported-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
2020-10-26btrfs: fix readahead hang and use-after-free after removing a deviceFilipe Manana5-0/+56
Very sporadically I had test case btrfs/069 from fstests hanging (for years, it is not a recent regression), with the following traces in dmesg/syslog: [162301.160628] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg started [162301.181196] BTRFS info (device sdc): scrub: finished on devid 4 with status: 0 [162301.287162] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg finished [162513.513792] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1356167 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.514318] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.514522] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.514747] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack: 0 pid:1356167 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [162513.514751] Call Trace: [162513.514761] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.514765] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.514771] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.514844] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.514850] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.514864] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.514879] transaction_kthread+0xa4/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.514891] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x660/0x660 [btrfs] [162513.514894] kthread+0x153/0x170 [162513.514897] ? kthread_stop+0x2c0/0x2c0 [162513.514902] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [162513.514916] INFO: task fsstress:1356184 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.515192] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.515431] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.515680] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356184 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.515682] Call Trace: [162513.515688] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.515691] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.515697] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.515712] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.515716] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.515729] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.515743] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.515753] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.515758] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.515761] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.515765] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.515768] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.515771] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.515774] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.515781] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.515782] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.515784] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.515786] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.515788] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 000000000daf0e74 RDI: 000000000000003a [162513.515789] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.515791] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000000003a [162513.515792] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.515804] INFO: task fsstress:1356185 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.516064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.516329] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.516617] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356185 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.516620] Call Trace: [162513.516625] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.516628] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.516634] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.516647] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.516650] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.516662] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.516679] btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x3c/0x100 [btrfs] [162513.516686] __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 [162513.516691] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200 [162513.516697] vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120 [162513.516703] setxattr+0x125/0x240 [162513.516709] ? lock_acquire+0xb1/0x480 [162513.516712] ? mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.516721] ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x8e/0xb0 [162513.516723] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516725] ? __sb_start_write+0x19b/0x290 [162513.516727] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516732] path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 [162513.516739] __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30 [162513.516741] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.516743] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.516745] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f56d5a [162513.516746] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.516748] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97868 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc [162513.516750] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f5238f56d5a [162513.516751] RDX: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 RSI: 00007fff67b978a0 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.516753] RBP: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007fff67b97700 [162513.516754] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 [162513.516756] R13: 0000000000000024 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fff67b978a0 [162513.516767] INFO: task fsstress:1356196 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.517064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.517365] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.517763] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356196 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.517780] Call Trace: [162513.517786] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.517789] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.517796] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.517810] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.517814] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.517829] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.517845] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.517857] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.517862] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.517865] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.517869] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.517872] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.517875] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.517878] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.517881] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.517883] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.517885] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.517887] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.517889] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000007660add2 RDI: 0000000000000053 [162513.517891] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 0000000000000067 R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.517893] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000053 [162513.517895] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.517908] INFO: task fsstress:1356197 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.518298] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.518672] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.519157] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356197 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.519160] Call Trace: [162513.519165] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.519168] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.519174] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.519190] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.519193] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.519206] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.519222] btrfs_create+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [162513.519230] lookup_open+0x522/0x650 [162513.519246] path_openat+0x2b8/0xa50 [162513.519270] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100 [162513.519275] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.519280] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.519285] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [162513.519287] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [162513.519295] do_sys_openat2+0x20d/0x2d0 [162513.519300] do_sys_open+0x44/0x80 [162513.519304] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.519307] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.519309] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f4a903 [162513.519310] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.519312] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97758 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055 [162513.519314] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007f5238f4a903 [162513.519316] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000001b6 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.519317] RBP: 00007fff67b978c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000002 [162513.519319] R10: 00007fff67b974f7 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000013 [162513.519320] R13: 00000000000001b6 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1c620 [162513.519332] INFO: task btrfs:1356211 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.519727] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.520115] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.520508] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid:1356211 ppid:1356178 flags:0x00004002 [162513.520511] Call Trace: [162513.520516] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.520519] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.520525] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.520544] btrfs_scrub_pause+0x11f/0x180 [btrfs] [162513.520548] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.520562] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x45a/0xc30 [btrfs] [162513.520574] ? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520596] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x6d8/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520619] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold+0x1cc/0x1fd [btrfs] [162513.520639] btrfs_ioctl+0x2a25/0x36f0 [btrfs] [162513.520643] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520645] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.520648] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520651] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.520655] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [162513.520657] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [162513.520660] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x35/0x50 [162513.520662] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520671] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520672] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520677] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.520679] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.520681] RIP: 0033:0x7fc3cd307d87 [162513.520682] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.520684] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30a56bb8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [162513.520686] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fc3cd307d87 [162513.520687] RDX: 00007ffe30a57a30 RSI: 00000000ca289435 RDI: 0000000000000003 [162513.520689] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [162513.520690] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [162513.520692] R13: 0000557323a212e0 R14: 00007ffe30a5a520 R15: 0000000000000001 [162513.520703] Showing all locks held in the system: [162513.520712] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/54: [162513.520713] #0: ffffffffb40a91a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x15/0x197 [162513.520728] 1 lock held by in:imklog/596: [162513.520729] #0: ffff8f3f0d781400 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60 [162513.520782] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/1356167: [162513.520784] #0: ffff8f3d810cc848 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0x4a/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.520798] 1 lock held by btrfs/1356190: [162513.520800] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0x60 [162513.520805] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356184: [162513.520806] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520811] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356185: [162513.520812] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520815] #1: ffff8f3d80a650b8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x50/0x120 [162513.520820] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520833] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356196: [162513.520834] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520838] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356197: [162513.520839] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520843] #1: ffff8f3d506465e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x2a7/0xa50 [162513.520846] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520858] 2 locks held by btrfs/1356211: [162513.520859] #0: ffff8f3d810cde30 (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x52/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520877] #1: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] This was weird because the stack traces show that a transaction commit, triggered by a device replace operation, is blocking trying to pause any running scrubs but there are no stack traces of blocked tasks doing a scrub. After poking around with drgn, I noticed there was a scrub task that was constantly running and blocking for shorts periods of time: >>> t = find_task(prog, 1356190) >>> prog.stack_trace(t) #0 __schedule+0x5ce/0xcfc #1 schedule+0x46/0xe4 #2 schedule_timeout+0x1df/0x475 #3 btrfs_reada_wait+0xda/0x132 #4 scrub_stripe+0x2a8/0x112f #5 scrub_chunk+0xcd/0x134 #6 scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x29e/0x5ee #7 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x2d5/0x91b #8 btrfs_ioctl+0x7f5/0x36e7 #9 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 #10 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x77 #11 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x7c/0x156 Which corresponds to: int btrfs_reada_wait(void *handle) { struct reada_control *rc = handle; struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = rc->fs_info; while (atomic_read(&rc->elems)) { if (!atomic_read(&fs_info->reada_works_cnt)) reada_start_machine(fs_info); wait_event_timeout(rc->wait, atomic_read(&rc->elems) == 0, (HZ + 9) / 10); } (...) So the counter "rc->elems" was set to 1 and never decreased to 0, causing the scrub task to loop forever in that function. Then I used the following script for drgn to check the readahead requests: $ cat dump_reada.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) def dump_re(re): nzones = re.nzones.value_() print(f're at {hex(re.value_())}') print(f'\t logical {re.logical.value_()}') print(f'\t refcnt {re.refcnt.value_()}') print(f'\t nzones {nzones}') for i in range(nzones): dev = re.zones[i].device name = dev.name.str.string_() print(f'\t\t dev id {dev.devid.value_()} name {name}') print() for _, e in radix_tree_for_each(fs_info.reada_tree): re = cast('struct reada_extent *', e) dump_re(re) $ drgn dump_reada.py re at 0xffff8f3da9d25ad8 logical 38928384 refcnt 1 nzones 1 dev id 0 name b'/dev/sdd' $ So there was one readahead extent with a single zone corresponding to the source device of that last device replace operation logged in dmesg/syslog. Also the ID of that zone's device was 0 which is a special value set in the source device of a device replace operation when the operation finishes (constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID set at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()), confirming again that device /dev/sdd was the source of a device replace operation. Normally there should be as many zones in the readahead extent as there are devices, and I wasn't expecting the extent to be in a block group with a 'single' profile, so I went and confirmed with the following drgn script that there weren't any single profile block groups: $ cat dump_block_groups.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA = (1 << 0) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM = (1 << 1) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA = (1 << 2) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 = (1 << 3) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 = (1 << 4) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP = (1 << 5) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 = (1 << 6) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 = (1 << 7) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 = (1 << 8) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 = (1 << 9) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4 = (1 << 10) def bg_flags_string(bg): flags = bg.flags.value_() ret = '' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA: ret = 'data' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'meta' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'system' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0: ret += ' raid0' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1: ret += ' raid1' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP: ret += ' dup' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10: ret += ' raid10' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5: ret += ' raid5' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6: ret += ' raid6' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3: ret += ' raid1c3' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4: ret += ' raid1c4' else: ret += ' single' return ret def dump_bg(bg): print() print(f'block group at {hex(bg.value_())}') print(f'\t start {bg.start.value_()} length {bg.length.value_()}') print(f'\t flags {bg.flags.value_()} - {bg_flags_string(bg)}') bg_root = fs_info.block_group_cache_tree.address_of_() for bg in rbtree_inorder_for_each_entry('struct btrfs_block_group', bg_root, 'cache_node'): dump_bg(bg) $ drgn dump_block_groups.py block group at 0xffff8f3d673b0400 start 22020096 length 16777216 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d53ddb400 start 38797312 length 536870912 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4d9c00 start 575668224 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d08189000 start 2723151872 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3db70ff000 start 2790260736 length 1073741824 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4dd800 start 3864002560 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d67037000 start 3931111424 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 $ So there were only 2 reasons left for having a readahead extent with a single zone: reada_find_zone(), called when creating a readahead extent, returned NULL either because we failed to find the corresponding block group or because a memory allocation failed. With some additional and custom tracing I figured out that on every further ocurrence of the problem the block group had just been deleted when we were looping to create the zones for the readahead extent (at reada_find_extent()), so we ended up with only one zone in the readahead extent, corresponding to a device that ends up getting replaced. So after figuring that out it became obvious why the hang happens: 1) Task A starts a scrub on any device of the filesystem, except for device /dev/sdd; 2) Task B starts a device replace with /dev/sdd as the source device; 3) Task A calls btrfs_reada_add() from scrub_stripe() and it is currently starting to scrub a stripe from block group X. This call to btrfs_reada_add() is the one for the extent tree. When btrfs_reada_add() calls reada_add_block(), it passes the logical address of the extent tree's root node as its 'logical' argument - a value of 38928384; 4) Task A then enters reada_find_extent(), called from reada_add_block(). It finds there isn't any existing readahead extent for the logical address 38928384, so it proceeds to the path of creating a new one. It calls btrfs_map_block() to find out which stripes exist for the block group X. On the first iteration of the for loop that iterates over the stripes, it finds the stripe for device /dev/sdd, so it creates one zone for that device and adds it to the readahead extent. Before getting into the second iteration of the loop, the cleanup kthread deletes block group X because it was empty. So in the iterations for the remaining stripes it does not add more zones to the readahead extent, because the calls to reada_find_zone() returned NULL because they couldn't find block group X anymore. As a result the new readahead extent has a single zone, corresponding to the device /dev/sdd; 4) Before task A returns to btrfs_reada_add() and queues the readahead job for the readahead work queue, task B finishes the device replace and at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() swaps the device /dev/sdd with the new device /dev/sdg; 5) Task A returns to reada_add_block(), which increments the counter "->elems" of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add(). Then it returns back to btrfs_reada_add() and calls reada_start_machine(). This queues a job in the readahead work queue to run the function reada_start_machine_worker(), which calls __reada_start_machine(). At __reada_start_machine() we take the device list mutex and for each device found in the current device list, we call reada_start_machine_dev() to start the readahead work. However at this point the device /dev/sdd was already freed and is not in the device list anymore. This means the corresponding readahead for the extent at 38928384 is never started, and therefore the "->elems" counter of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add() never goes down to 0, causing the call to btrfs_reada_wait(), done by the scrub task, to wait forever. Note that the readahead request can be made either after the device replace started or before it started, however in pratice it is very unlikely that a device replace is able to start after a readahead request is made and is able to complete before the readahead request completes - maybe only on a very small and nearly empty filesystem. This hang however is not the only problem we can have with readahead and device removals. When the readahead extent has other zones other than the one corresponding to the device that is being removed (either by a device replace or a device remove operation), we risk having a use-after-free on the device when dropping the last reference of the readahead extent. For example if we create a readahead extent with two zones, one for the device /dev/sdd and one for the device /dev/sde: 1) Before the readahead worker starts, the device /dev/sdd is removed, and the corresponding btrfs_device structure is freed. However the readahead extent still has the zone pointing to the device structure; 2) When the readahead worker starts, it only finds device /dev/sde in the current device list of the filesystem; 3) It starts the readahead work, at reada_start_machine_dev(), using the device /dev/sde; 4) Then when it finishes reading the extent from device /dev/sde, it calls __readahead_hook() which ends up dropping the last reference on the readahead extent through the last call to reada_extent_put(); 5) At reada_extent_put() it iterates over each zone of the readahead extent and attempts to delete an element from the device's 'reada_extents' radix tree, resulting in a use-after-free, as the device pointer of the zone for /dev/sdd is now stale. We can also access the device after dropping the last reference of a zone, through reada_zone_release(), also called by reada_extent_put(). And a device remove suffers the same problem, however since it shrinks the device size down to zero before removing the device, it is very unlikely to still have readahead requests not completed by the time we free the device, the only possibility is if the device has a very little space allocated. While the hang problem is exclusive to scrub, since it is currently the only user of btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_reada_wait(), the use-after-free problem affects any path that triggers readhead, which includes btree_readahead_hook() and __readahead_hook() (a readahead worker can trigger readahed for the children of a node) for example - any path that ends up calling reada_add_block() can trigger the use-after-free after a device is removed. So fix this by waiting for any readahead requests for a device to complete before removing a device, ensuring that while waiting for existing ones no new ones can be made. This problem has been around for a very long time - the readahead code was added in 2011, device remove exists since 2008 and device replace was introduced in 2013, hard to pick a specific commit for a git Fixes tag. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
2020-10-26btrfs: fix use-after-free on readahead extent after failure to create itFilipe Manana1-0/+2
If we fail to find suitable zones for a new readahead extent, we end up leaving a stale pointer in the global readahead extents radix tree (fs_info->reada_tree), which can trigger the following trace later on: [13367.696354] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000b0 [13367.696802] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [13367.697249] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [13367.697721] PGD 0 P4D 0 [13367.698171] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [13367.698632] CPU: 6 PID: 851214 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [13367.699100] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [13367.700069] RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x20a/0x3970 [13367.700562] Code: ff 1f 0f b7 c0 48 0f (...) [13367.701609] RSP: 0018:ffffb14448f57790 EFLAGS: 00010046 [13367.702140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 29b935140c15e8cf RCX: 0000000000000000 [13367.702698] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffffffb3d66bd0 RDI: 0000000000000046 [13367.703240] RBP: ffff8a52ba8ac040 R08: 00000c2866ad9288 R09: 0000000000000001 [13367.703783] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000000b66d9b53 R12: ffff8a52ba8ac9b0 [13367.704330] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8a532b6333e8 R15: 0000000000000000 [13367.704880] FS: 00007fe1df6b5700(0000) GS:ffff8a5376600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [13367.705438] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [13367.705995] CR2: 00000000000000b0 CR3: 000000022cca8004 CR4: 00000000003706e0 [13367.706565] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [13367.707127] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [13367.707686] Call Trace: [13367.708246] ? ___slab_alloc+0x395/0x740 [13367.708820] ? reada_add_block+0xae/0xee0 [btrfs] [13367.709383] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x480 [13367.709955] ? reada_add_block+0xe0/0xee0 [btrfs] [13367.710537] ? reada_add_block+0xae/0xee0 [btrfs] [13367.711097] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5d/0x90 [13367.711659] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x8d2/0x990 [13367.712221] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [13367.712784] _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x80 [13367.713356] ? reada_add_block+0xe0/0xee0 [btrfs] [13367.713966] reada_add_block+0xe0/0xee0 [btrfs] [13367.714529] ? btrfs_root_node+0x15/0x1f0 [btrfs] [13367.715077] btrfs_reada_add+0x117/0x170 [btrfs] [13367.715620] scrub_stripe+0x21e/0x10d0 [btrfs] [13367.716141] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10 [13367.716657] ? __lock_acquire+0x41e/0x3970 [13367.717184] ? scrub_chunk+0x60/0x140 [btrfs] [13367.717697] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [13367.718254] ? scrub_chunk+0x60/0x140 [btrfs] [13367.718773] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [13367.719278] ? scrub_chunk+0xcd/0x140 [btrfs] [13367.719786] scrub_chunk+0xcd/0x140 [btrfs] [13367.720291] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x270/0x5c0 [btrfs] [13367.720787] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [13367.721281] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x1ee/0x620 [btrfs] [13367.721762] ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x8e/0xb0 [13367.722235] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [13367.722710] ? __sb_start_write+0x19b/0x290 [13367.723192] btrfs_ioctl+0x7f5/0x36f0 [btrfs] [13367.723660] ? __fget_files+0x101/0x1d0 [13367.724118] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [13367.724559] ? __fget_files+0x101/0x1d0 [13367.724982] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [13367.725399] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [13367.725802] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [13367.726188] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [13367.726574] RIP: 0033:0x7fe1df7add87 [13367.726948] Code: 00 00 00 48 8b 05 09 91 (...) [13367.727763] RSP: 002b:00007fe1df6b4d48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [13367.728179] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055ce1fb596a0 RCX: 00007fe1df7add87 [13367.728604] RDX: 000055ce1fb596a0 RSI: 00000000c400941b RDI: 0000000000000003 [13367.729021] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007fe1df6b5700 R09: 0000000000000000 [13367.729431] R10: 00007fe1df6b5700 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffd922b07de [13367.729842] R13: 00007ffd922b07df R14: 00007fe1df6b4e40 R15: 0000000000802000 [13367.730275] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor (...) [13367.732638] CR2: 00000000000000b0 [13367.733166] ---[ end trace d298b6805556acd9 ]--- What happens is the following: 1) At reada_find_extent() we don't find any existing readahead extent for the metadata extent starting at logical address X; 2) So we proceed to create a new one. We then call btrfs_map_block() to get information about which stripes contain extent X; 3) After that we iterate over the stripes and create only one zone for the readahead extent - only one because reada_find_zone() returned NULL for all iterations except for one, either because a memory allocation failed or it couldn't find the block group of the extent (it may have just been deleted); 4) We then add the new readahead extent to the readahead extents radix tree at fs_info->reada_tree; 5) Then we iterate over each zone of the new readahead extent, and find that the device used for that zone no longer exists, because it was removed or it was the source device of a device replace operation. Since this left 'have_zone' set to 0, after finishing the loop we jump to the 'error' label, call kfree() on the new readahead extent and return without removing it from the radix tree at fs_info->reada_tree; 6) Any future call to reada_find_extent() for the logical address X will find the stale pointer in the readahead extents radix tree, increment its reference counter, which can trigger the use-after-free right away or return it to the caller reada_add_block() that results in the use-after-free of the example trace above. So fix this by making sure we delete the readahead extent from the radix tree if we fail to setup zones for it (when 'have_zone = 0'). Fixes: 319450211842ba ("btrfs: reada: bypass adding extent when all zone failed") CC: [email protected] # 4.9+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
2020-10-26btrfs: tree-checker: validate number of chunk stripes and parityDaniel Xu1-0/+18
If there's no parity and num_stripes < ncopies, a crafted image can trigger a division by zero in calc_stripe_length(). The image was generated through fuzzing. CC: [email protected] # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209587 Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
2020-10-26btrfs: tree-checker: fix incorrect printk formatPujin Shi1-1/+1
This patch addresses a compile warning: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c: In function '__btrfs_free_extent': fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3187:4: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 8 has type 'unsigned int' [-Wformat=] Fixes: 1c2a07f598d5 ("btrfs: extent-tree: kill BUG_ON() in __btrfs_free_extent()") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pujin Shi <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
2020-10-26btrfs: drop the path before adding block group sysfs filesJosef Bacik1-0/+1
Dave reported a problem with my rwsem conversion patch where we got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/76 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9d5d25df2530 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc+0x30/0x9c0 alloc_inode+0x81/0x90 iget_locked+0xcd/0x1a0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x210 sysfs_get_tree+0x1a/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x58/0x80 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x70/0xd0 kobject_add_internal+0xbb/0x2d0 kobject_add+0x7a/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x141/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_read_block_groups+0x1f1/0x8c0 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x981/0x1108 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0xe/0xb0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 fc_mount+0xe/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90 btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] check_committed_ref+0x69/0x200 [btrfs] btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0 [btrfs] run_delalloc_nocow+0x446/0x9b0 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x61/0x6a0 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0xae/0x160 [btrfs] __extent_writepage+0x262/0x420 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b6/0x510 [btrfs] extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x40/0xe0 __writeback_single_inode+0x62/0x610 writeback_sb_inodes+0x20f/0x500 wb_writeback+0xef/0x4a0 wb_do_writeback+0x49/0x2e0 wb_workfn+0x81/0x340 process_one_work+0x233/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x2c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x7de/0x850 [btrfs] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x8e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x367/0xbc0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x2db/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0xd0b/0x2690 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/76: #0: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa40b8b58 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0 #2: ffff9d5d322390e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 76 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xff/0x110 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x30b/0x560 [btrfs] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 ? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750 kthread+0x137/0x150 ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are still holding the path open when we start adding the sysfs files for the block groups, which creates a dependency on fs_reclaim via the tree lock. Fix this by dropping the path before we start doing anything with sysfs. Reported-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> CC: [email protected] # 5.8+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
2020-10-26blk-cgroup: Pre-allocate tree node on blkg_conf_prepGabriel Krisman Bertazi1-2/+12
Similarly to commit 457e490f2b741 ("blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock"), blkg_create can also trigger occasional -ENOMEM failures at the radix insertion because any allocation inside blkg_create has to be non-blocking, making it more likely to fail. This causes trouble for userspace tools trying to configure io weights who need to deal with this condition. This patch reduces the occurrence of -ENOMEMs on this path by preloading the radix tree element on a GFP_KERNEL context, such that we guarantee the later non-blocking insertion won't fail. A similar solution exists in blkcg_init_queue for the same situation. Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
2020-10-26blk-cgroup: Fix memleak on error pathGabriel Krisman Bertazi1-0/+1
If new_blkg allocation raced with blk_policy change and blkg_lookup_check fails, new_blkg is leaked. Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
2020-10-26s390: correct __bootdata / __bootdata_preserved macrosVasily Gorbik1-2/+2
Currently s390 build is broken. SECTCMP .boot.data error: section .boot.data differs between vmlinux and arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux make[2]: *** [arch/s390/boot/section_cmp.boot.data] Error 1 SECTCMP .boot.preserved.data error: section .boot.preserved.data differs between vmlinux and arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux make[2]: *** [arch/s390/boot/section_cmp.boot.preserved.data] Error 1 make[1]: *** [bzImage] Error 2 Commit 33def8498fdd ("treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")") converted all __section(foo) to __section("foo"). This is wrong for __bootdata / __bootdata_preserved macros which want variable names to be a part of intermediate section names .boot.data.<var name> and .boot.preserved.data.<var name>. Those sections are later sorted by alignment + name and merged together into final .boot.data / .boot.preserved.data sections. Those sections must be identical in the decompressor and the decompressed kernel (that is checked during the build). Fixes: 33def8498fdd ("treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")") Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
2020-10-26arm64: vdso32: Allow ld.lld to properly link the VDSONathan Chancellor1-11/+12
As it stands now, the vdso32 Makefile hardcodes the linker to ld.bfd using -fuse-ld=bfd with $(CC). This was taken from the arm vDSO Makefile, as the comment notes, done in commit d2b30cd4b722 ("ARM: 8384/1: VDSO: force use of BFD linker"). Commit fe00e50b2db8 ("ARM: 8858/1: vdso: use $(LD) instead of $(CC) to link VDSO") changed that Makefile to use $(LD) directly instead of through $(CC), which matches how the rest of the kernel operates. Since then, LD=ld.lld means that the arm vDSO will be linked with ld.lld, which has shown no problems so far. Allow ld.lld to link this vDSO as we do the regular arm vDSO. To do this, we need to do a few things: * Add a LD_COMPAT variable, which defaults to $(CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT)ld with gcc and $(LD) if LLVM is 1, which will be ld.lld, or $(CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT)ld if not, which matches the logic of the main Makefile. It is overrideable for further customization and avoiding breakage. * Eliminate cc32-ldoption, which matches commit 055efab3120b ("kbuild: drop support for cc-ldoption"). With those, we can use $(LD_COMPAT) in cmd_ldvdso and change the flags from compiler linker flags to linker flags directly. We eliminate -mfloat-abi=soft because it is not handled by the linker. Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <[email protected]> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1033 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
2020-10-26Merge tag 'scmi-fixes-5.10' of ↵Arnd Bergmann9-12/+34
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux into arm/fixes ARM SCMI fixes for v5.10 Handful of fixes, some of them fixing issues since SCMI was merged. It indicates that it is getting used now and people are finding bugs. Fixes include unblocking multiple thread access with SMC/HVC transport, ARCH_COLD_RESET value, locking in notifications, avoiding workqueue name duplication with multiple instances of SCMI and adding missing Rx size initialisation when using buffers for repeat transmits. * tag 'scmi-fixes-5.10' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux: firmware: arm_scmi: Fix duplicate workqueue name firmware: arm_scmi: Fix locking in notifications firmware: arm_scmi: Add missing Rx size re-initialisation firmware: arm_scmi: Expand SMC/HVC message pool to more than one firmware: arm_scmi: Fix ARCH_COLD_RESET Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201015123518.GA3839@bogus Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
2020-10-26stop_machine, rcu: Mark functions as notraceZong Li2-2/+2
Some architectures assume that the stopped CPUs don't make function calls to traceable functions when they are in the stopped state. See also commit cb9d7fd51d9f ("watchdog: Mark watchdog touch functions as notrace"). Violating this assumption causes kernel crashes when switching tracer on RISC-V. Mark rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() and stop_machine_yield() notrace to prevent this. Fixes: 4ecf0a43e729 ("processor: get rid of cpu_relax_yield") Fixes: 366237e7b083 ("stop_machine: Provide RCU quiescent state in multi_cpu_stop()") Signed-off-by: Zong Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]> Tested-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-10-26time: Prevent undefined behaviour in timespec64_to_ns()Zeng Tao2-4/+4
UBSAN reports: Undefined behaviour in ./include/linux/time64.h:127:27 signed integer overflow: 17179869187 * 1000000000 cannot be represented in type 'long long int' Call Trace: timespec64_to_ns include/linux/time64.h:127 [inline] set_cpu_itimer+0x65c/0x880 kernel/time/itimer.c:180 do_setitimer+0x8e/0x740 kernel/time/itimer.c:245 __x64_sys_setitimer+0x14c/0x2c0 kernel/time/itimer.c:336 do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x540 arch/x86/entry/common.c:295 Commit bd40a175769d ("y2038: itimer: change implementation to timespec64") replaced the original conversion which handled time clamping correctly with timespec64_to_ns() which has no overflow protection. Fix it in timespec64_to_ns() as this is not necessarily limited to the usage in itimers. [ tglx: Added comment and adjusted the fixes tag ] Fixes: 361a3bf00582 ("time64: Add time64.h header and define struct timespec64") Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-10-26drm/v3d: Fix double free in v3d_submit_cl_ioctl()Dan Carpenter1-1/+0
Originally this error path used to leak "bin" but then we accidentally applied two separate commits to fix it and ended up with a double free. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201026094905.GA1634423@mwanda
2020-10-26drm/sun4i: frontend: Fix the scaler phase on A33Maxime Ripard1-1/+1
The A33 has a different phase parameter in the Allwinner BSP on the channel1 than the one currently applied. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-10-26drm/sun4i: frontend: Reuse the ch0 phase for RGB formatsMaxime Ripard1-3/+5
When using the scaler on the A10-like frontend with single-planar formats, the current code will setup the channel 0 filter (used for the R or Y component) with a different phase parameter than the channel 1 filter (used for the G/B or U/V components). This creates a bleed out that keeps repeating on of the last line of the RGB plane across the rest of the display. The Allwinner BSP either applies the same phase parameter over both channels or use a separate one, the condition being whether the input format is YUV420 or not. Since YUV420 is both subsampled and multi-planar, and since YUYV is subsampled but single-planar, we can rule out the subsampling and assume that the condition is actually whether the format is single or multi-planar. And it looks like applying the same phase parameter over both channels for single-planar formats fixes our issue, while we keep the multi-planar formats working properly. Reported-by: Taras Galchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-10-26drm/sun4i: frontend: Rework a bit the phase dataMaxime Ripard2-31/+9
The scaler filter phase setup in the allwinner kernel has two different cases for setting up the scaler filter, the first one using different phase parameters for the two channels, and the second one reusing the first channel parameters on the second channel. The allwinner kernel has a third option where the horizontal phase of the second channel will be set to a different value than the vertical one (and seems like it's the same value than one used on the first channel). However, that code path seems to never be taken, so we can ignore it for now, and it's essentially what we're doing so far as well. Since we will have always the same values across each components of the filter setup for a given channel, we can simplify a bit our frontend structure by only storing the phase value we want to apply to a given channel. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-10-26Merge remote-tracking branch 'drm-misc/drm-misc-next-fixes' into drm-misc-fixesMaxime Ripard2-8/+21
We have a few leftovers from the merge window period in drm-misc-next-fixes, let's bring them into drm-misc-fixes Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
2020-10-26timers: Remove unused inline funtion debug_timer_free()YueHaibing1-5/+0
There is no caller in tree, remove it. Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-10-26hrtimer: Remove unused inline function debug_hrtimer_free()YueHaibing1-5/+0
There is no caller in tree, remove it. Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-10-26time/sched_clock: Mark sched_clock_read_begin/retry() as notraceQuanyang Wang1-2/+2
Since sched_clock_read_begin() and sched_clock_read_retry() are called by notrace function sched_clock(), they shouldn't be traceable either, or else ftrace_graph_caller will run into a dead loop on the path as below (arm for instance): ftrace_graph_caller() prepare_ftrace_return() function_graph_enter() ftrace_push_return_trace() trace_clock_local() sched_clock() sched_clock_read_begin/retry() Fixes: 1b86abc1c645 ("sched_clock: Expose struct clock_read_data") Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-10-26Merge tag 'tee-fix-for-v5.10' of ↵Arnd Bergmann1-1/+2
git://git.linaro.org:/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee into arm/fixes Reenable kernel login method for kernel TEE client API The kernel TEE login method was accidentally disabled previously when enabling a few other login methods, so fix that here. * tag 'tee-fix-for-v5.10' of git://git.linaro.org:/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee: tee: client UUID: Skip REE kernel login method as well Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201013070918.GA3328976@jade Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
2020-10-26ARM: dts: mmp2-olpc-xo-1-75: Use plural form of "-gpios"Lubomir Rintel1-2/+2
This makes validation happier. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Powered by cgit, Gruvboxed by Blaster4385.