aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-06-16drm/i915/gt: Move hsw GT workarounds from init_clock_gating to workaroundsChris Wilson2-37/+50
Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are included in our verification that the workarounds are applied. v2: Leave HSW_SCRATCH to set an explicit value, not or in our disable bit. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2011 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit f93ec5fb563779bda4501890b1854526de58e0f1) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
2020-06-16drm/i915/icl: Disable DIP on MST ports with the transcoder clock still onImre Deak2-1/+11
According to BSpec the Data Island Packet should be disabled after disabling the transcoder, but before the transcoder clock select is set to none. On an ICL RVP, daisy-chained MST config not following this leads to a hang with the following MCE when disabling the output: [ 870.948739] mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 5 Bank 6: ba00000011000402 [ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: RIP !INEXACT! 10:<ffffffff81aca652> {poll_idle+0x92/0xb0} [ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 135a261fe61 [ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:706e5 TIME 1591739604 SOCKET 0 APIC 0 microcode 20 [ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: Run the above through 'mcelog --ascii' [ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check: Processor context corrupt [ 871.019212] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal machine check [ 871.019212] Kernel Offset: disabled Bspec: 4287 Fixes: fa37a213275c ("drm/i915: Stop sending DP SDPs on ddi disable") Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <[email protected]> Cc: Uma Shankar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit c980216dd224c52b5c70172753c209b653d84958) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
2020-06-16drm/i915/gt: Incrementally check for rewindingChris Wilson6-4/+154
In commit 5ba32c7be81e ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL"), we placed the check for rewinding a context on actually submitting the next request in that context. This was so that we only had to check once, and could do so with precision avoiding as many forced restores as possible. For example, to ensure that we can resubmit the same request a couple of times, we include a small wa_tail such that on the next submission, the ring->tail will appear to move forwards when resubmitting the same request. This is very common as it will happen for every lite-restore to fill the second port after a context switch. However, intel_ring_direction() is limited in precision to movements of upto half the ring size. The consequence being that if we tried to unwind many requests, we could exceed half the ring and flip the sense of the direction, so missing a force restore. As no request can be greater than half the ring (i.e. 2048 bytes in the smallest case), we can check for rollback incrementally. As we check against the tail that would be submitted, we do not lose any sensitivity and allow lite restores for the simple case. We still need to double check upon submitting the context, to allow for multiple preemptions and resubmissions. Fixes: 5ba32c7be81e ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> # v5.4+ Reviewed-by: Bruce Chang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit e36ba817fa966f81fb1c8d16f3721b5a644b2fa9) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
2020-06-16drm/i915/tc: fix the reset of ln0Khaled Almahallawy1-1/+1
Setting ln0 similar to ln1 Fixes: 3b51be4e4061b ("drm/i915/tc: Update DP_MODE programming") Cc: <[email protected]> # v5.5+ Signed-off-by: Khaled Almahallawy <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit 4f72a8ee819d57d7329d88f487a2fc9b45153177) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
2020-06-16drm/i915/gt: Prevent timeslicing into unpreemptable requestsChris Wilson3-2/+119
We have a I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT flag that we set when we must prevent the HW from preempting during the course of this request. We need to honour this flag and protect the HW even if we have a heartbeat request, or other maximum priority barrier, pending. As such, restrict the timeslicing check to avoid preempting into the topmost priority band, leaving the unpreemptable requests in blissful peace running uninterrupted on the HW. v2: Set the I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER to be less than I915_PRIORITY_UNPREEMPTABLE so that we never submit a request (heartbeat or barrier) that can legitimately preempt the current non-premptable request. Fixes: 2a98f4e65bba ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit b72f02d78e4f257761ed003444ae52083f962076) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
2020-06-16drm/i915/selftests: Restore to default heartbeatChris Wilson4-109/+67
Since we temporarily disable the heartbeat and restore back to the default value, we can use the stored defaults on the engine and avoid using a local. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit 3a230a554dbbc6cd5016cf1b56ee77cfcd48c7d8) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
2020-06-16mfd: mt6360: Fix register driver NULL pointer by adding driver nameGene Chen1-0/+1
The driver name was accidentally removed when .probe() by was replaced by .probe_new() during an early patch review. [ 121.243012] EAX: c2a8bc64 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000 [ 121.243012] ESI: c2a8bc79 EDI: 00000000 EBP: e54bdea8 ESP: e54bdea0 [ 121.243012] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 121.243012] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 02ec3000 CR4: 000006b0 [ 121.243012] Call Trace: [ 121.243012] kset_find_obj+0x3d/0xc0 [ 121.243012] driver_find+0x16/0x40 [ 121.243012] driver_register+0x49/0x100 [ 121.243012] ? i2c_for_each_dev+0x39/0x50 [ 121.243012] ? __process_new_adapter+0x20/0x20 [ 121.243012] ? cht_wc_driver_init+0x11/0x11 [ 121.243012] i2c_register_driver+0x30/0x80 [ 121.243012] ? intel_lpss_pci_driver_init+0x16/0x16 [ 121.243012] mt6360_pmu_driver_init+0xf/0x11 [ 121.243012] do_one_initcall+0x33/0x1a0 [ 121.243012] ? parse_args+0x1eb/0x3d0 [ 121.243012] ? __might_sleep+0x31/0x90 [ 121.243012] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x10a/0x17f [ 121.243012] kernel_init_freeable+0x12c/0x17f [ 121.243012] ? rest_init+0x110/0x110 [ 121.243012] kernel_init+0xb/0x100 [ 121.243012] ? schedule_tail_wrapper+0x9/0xc [ 121.243012] ret_from_fork+0x19/0x24 [ 121.243012] Modules linked in: [ 121.243012] CR2: 0000000000000000 [ 121.243012] random: get_random_bytes called from init_oops_id+0x3a/0x40 with crng_init=0 [ 121.243012] ---[ end trace 38a803400f1a2bee ]--- [ 121.243012] EIP: strcmp+0x11/0x30 Fixes: 7edd363421dab ("mfd: Add support for PMIC MT6360") Signed-off-by: Gene Chen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]> [Lee: Taking the opportunity to fix the compatible string too 's/_/-/'] Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
2020-06-16pinctrl: mcp23s08: Split to three parts: fix ptr_ret.cocci warningskernel test robot1-4/+1
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c:129:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci Fixes: 0f04a81784fe ("pinctrl: mcp23s08: Split to three parts: core, I²C, SPI") Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> CC: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200608010253.GA79576@44f7ab9e8d59 Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
2020-06-16pinctrl: tegra: Use noirq suspend/resume callbacksVidya Sagar1-2/+2
Use noirq suspend/resume callbacks as other drivers which implement noirq suspend/resume callbacks (Ex:- PCIe) depend on pinctrl driver to configure the signals used by their respective devices in the noirq phase. Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
2020-06-16pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: fix warning about irq chip reusageDmitry Baryshkov1-11/+10
Fix the following warnings caused by reusage of the same irq_chip instance for all spmi-gpio gpio_irq_chip instances. Instead embed irq_chip into pmic_gpio_state struct. gpio gpiochip2: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@2:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver. gpio gpiochip3: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@4:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver. gpio gpiochip4: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@a:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
2020-06-15w1: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-2/+2
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15tracing/probe: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15soc: ti: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15tifm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15dmaengine: tegra-apb: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15stm class: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva2-3/+3
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15Squashfs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-8/+8
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15ASoC: SOF: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-4/+4
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15ima: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-2/+2
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15sctp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-18/+18
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15phy: samsung: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15RxRPC: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-2/+2
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15rapidio: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15media: pwc: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15firmware: pcdp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15oprofile: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15block: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15tools/testing/nvdimm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-3/+3
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15libata: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15kprobes: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15keys: encrypted-type: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15kexec: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15KVM: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15jffs2: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva2-3/+3
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15ibft: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15samples: mei: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15ia64: kernel: unwind_i.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15FS-Cache: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15firewire: ohci: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva5-5/+5
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15cb710: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15drm/edid: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15drbd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva2-5/+5
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15crypto: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-4/+4
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15can: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15can: peak_canfd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-2/+2
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15dmaengine: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva7-8/+8
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15ARM: tegra: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15aio: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15firmware: google: vpd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-06-15firmware: google: memconsole: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array ↵Gustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
member There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Powered by cgit, Gruvboxed by Blaster4385.