| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While the conversion of BKL to mutex in commit 645ef9ef, the mutex
definition was put in a wrong place inside #ifdef WSND_DEBUG, which
leads to the build error. Just move it outside the ifdef.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
|
|
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4
Pull ext4 bugfixes from Ted Ts'o:
"Various regression and bug fixes for ext4"
* tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
ext4: don't allow ext4_free_blocks() to fail due to ENOMEM
ext4: fix spelling errors and a comment in extent_status tree
ext4: rate limit printk in buffer_io_error()
ext4: don't show usrquota/grpquota twice in /proc/mounts
ext4: fix warning in ext4_evict_inode()
ext4: fix ext4_get_group_number()
ext4: silence warning in ext4_writepages()
|
|
Some callers of ext4_es_remove_extent() and ext4_es_insert_extent()
may not be completely robust against ENOMEM failures (or the
consequences of reflecting ENOMEM back up to userspace may lead to
xfstest or user application failure).
To mitigate against this, when trying to insert an entry in the extent
status tree, try to shrink the inode's extent status tree before
returning ENOMEM. If there are entries which don't record information
about extents under delayed allocations, freeing one of them is
preferable to returning ENOMEM.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <[email protected]>
|
|
In ext4_ext_map_blocks(), if we have successfully allocated the data
blocks, but then run into trouble inserting the extent into the extent
tree, most likely due to an ENOSPC condition, determine the arguments
to ext4_free_blocks() in a simpler way which is easier to prove to be
correct.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
|
|
Previously ext4_ext_truncate() was ignoring potential error returns
from ext4_es_remove_extent() and ext4_ext_remove_space(). This can
lead to the on-diks extent tree and the extent status tree cache
getting out of sync, which is particuarlly bad, and can lead to file
system corruption and potential data loss.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the drivers/block uses of the __cpuinit macros
from all C files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the remaining one-off uses of the __cpuinit macros
from all C files in the drivers/* directory.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the uses of the __cpuinit macros from C files in
the core kernel directories (kernel, init, lib, mm, and include)
that don't really have a specific maintainer.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the drivers/rcu uses of the __cpuinit macros
from all C files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the net/* uses of the __cpuinit macros
from all C files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the drivers/acpi uses of the __cpuinit macros
from all C files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the drivers/hwmon uses of the __cpuinit macros
from all C files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the drivers/cpufreq uses of the __cpuinit macros
from all C files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
[v2: leave 2nd lines of args misaligned as requested by Viresh]
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the drivers/clocksource and drivers/irqchip uses of
the __cpuinit macros from all C files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/x86 uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. x86 only had the one __CPUINIT used in assembly files,
and it wasn't paired off with a .previous or a __FINIT, so we can
delete it directly w/o any corresponding additional change there.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/score uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently score does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Chen Liqin <[email protected]>
Cc: Lennox Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/xtensa uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently xtensa does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Chris Zankel <[email protected]>
Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/openrisc uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently openrisc does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/m32r uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently m32r does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Hirokazu Takata <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/hexagon uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently hexagon does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Richard Kuo <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Richard Kuo <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/frv uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently frv does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: David Howells <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/cris uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently cris does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Mikael Starvik <[email protected]>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/metag uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently metag does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: James Hogan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: James Hogan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/tile uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently tile does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Chris Metcalf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/sh uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently sh does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Paul Mundt <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/s390 uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently s390 does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/blackfin uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently blackfin does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
Cc: Bob Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Sonic Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/arm64 uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files. Currently arm64 does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the arch/sparc uses of the __cpuinit macros from
C files and removes __CPUINIT from assembly files. Note that even
though arch/sparc/kernel/trampoline_64.S has instances of ".previous"
in it, they are all paired off against explicit ".section" directives,
and not implicitly paired with __CPUINIT (unlike mips and arm were).
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
and are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the ARM uses of the __cpuinit macros from C code,
and all __CPUINIT from assembly code. It also had two ".previous"
section statements that were paired off against __CPUINIT
(aka .section ".cpuinit.text") that also get removed here.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
commit 3747069b25e419f6b51395f48127e9812abc3596 upstream.
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
and are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
Here, we remove all the MIPS __cpuinit from C code and __CPUINIT
from asm files. MIPS is interesting in this respect, because there
are also uasm users hiding behind their own renamed versions of the
__cpuinit macros.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
[[email protected]: Folded in Paul's followup fix.]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5494/
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5495/
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5509/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the parisc uses of the __cpuinit macros.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Acked-by: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
This removes all the alpha uses of the __cpuinit macros.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
|
|
The Kconfig symbol CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX_DEBUGFS was renamed to
ARM_S3C24XX_CPUFREQ_DEBUGFS in commit f023f8dd59 ("cpufreq: s3c24xx:
move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq"). But that commit missed one
instance of its macro CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX_DEBUGFS. Rename it too.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
|
|
Fix a comment typo (sorce -> source) in pm_wakeup.h.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
|
|
Prevent automatic system suspend from happening during system
shutdown by making try_to_suspend() check system_state and return
immediately if it is not SYSTEM_RUNNING.
This prevents the following breakage from happening (scenario from
Zhang Yanmin):
Kernel starts shutdown and calls all device driver's shutdown
callback. When a driver's shutdown is called, the last wakelock is
released and suspend-to-ram starts. However, as some driver's shut
down callbacks already shut down devices and disabled runtime pm,
the suspend-to-ram calls driver's suspend callback without noticing
that device is already off and causes crash.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Liu ShuoX <[email protected]>
Cc: 3.5+ <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
|
|
commit a66b2e (cpufreq: Preserve sysfs files across suspend/resume)
has unfortunately caused several things in the cpufreq subsystem to
break subtly after a suspend/resume cycle.
The intention of that patch was to retain the file permissions of the
cpufreq related sysfs files across suspend/resume. To achieve that,
the commit completely removed the calls to cpufreq_add_dev() and
__cpufreq_remove_dev() during suspend/resume transitions. But the
problem is that those functions do 2 kinds of things:
1. Low-level initialization/tear-down that are critical to the
correct functioning of cpufreq-core.
2. Kobject and sysfs related initialization/teardown.
Ideally we should have reorganized the code to cleanly separate these
two responsibilities, and skipped only the sysfs related parts during
suspend/resume. Since we skipped the entire callbacks instead (which
also included some CPU and cpufreq-specific critical components),
cpufreq subsystem started behaving erratically after suspend/resume.
So revert the commit to fix the regression. We'll revisit and address
the original goal of that commit separately, since it involves quite a
bit of careful code reorganization and appears to be non-trivial.
(While reverting the commit, note that another commit f51e1eb
(cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume) already
reverted part of the original set of changes. So revert only the
remaining ones).
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Paul Bolle <[email protected]>
Cc: 3.10+ <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
|
|
device->driver_data needs to be cleared when releasing its data,
mem_device, in an error path of acpi_memory_device_add().
The function evaluates the _CRS of memory device objects, and fails
when it gets an unexpected resource or cannot allocate memory. A
kernel crash or data corruption may occur when the kernel accesses
the stale pointer.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: 2.6.32+ <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
|
|
An ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK notification means that we should scan the
entire namespace starting from the given handle even if the device
represented by that handle is present (other devices below it may
just have appeared).
For this reason, modify acpi_scan_bus_device_check() to always run
acpi_bus_scan() if the notification being handled is of type
ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <[email protected]>
Cc: 3.10+ <[email protected]>
|
|
In acpi_bus_device_attach(), if there is an ACPI device object
for the given handle and that device object has a scan handler
attached to it already, there's nothing more to do for that handle.
Moreover, if acpi_scan_attach_handler() is called then, it may
execute the .attach() callback of the ACPI scan handler already
attached to the device object and that may lead to interesting
breakage.
For this reason, make acpi_bus_device_attach() return success
immediately when the handle's device object has a scan handler
attached to it.
Reported-by: Toshi Kani <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <[email protected]>
Cc: 3.10+ <[email protected]>
|
|
abx500_temp_attributes is used only in this file. Make it static.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
|
|
|