aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-11-11ASoC: rt5677: Stop and restart DSP over suspend/resumeBen Zhang2-4/+23
MCLK1 gets disabled at suspend and re-enabled at resume. Before MCLK1 is re-enabled, if the DSP is already on (either the DSP was left on during suspend, or the DSP is turned on early at resume), i2c register read returns garbage and corrupts the regmap cache. This patch stops the DSP before suspend and restarts it after resume with a dalay to ensure MCLK is on while loading firmware. Signed-off-by: Ben Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-11ASoC: rt5677: Mark reg RT5677_PWR_ANLG2 as volatileBen Zhang1-0/+1
The codec dies when RT5677_PWR_ANLG2(MX-64h) is set to 0xACE1 while it's streaming audio over SPI. The DSP firmware turns on PLL2 (MX-64 bit 8) when SPI streaming starts. However regmap does not believe that register can change by itself. When BST1 (bit 15) is turned on with regmap_update_bits(), it doesn't read the register first before write, so PLL2 power bit is cleared by accident. Marking MX-64h as volatile in regmap solved the issue. Signed-off-by: Ben Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-11ASoC: rt5677: Add DAPM audio path for hotword streamBen Zhang1-1/+22
Add a DAPM audio path from "DMIC L1" to "DSP Buffer" so that when hotwording is enabled, DAPM does not power off the codec with SND_SOC_BIAS_OFF. Signed-off-by: Ben Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-11ASoC: rt5677: Enable jack detect while DSP is runningBen Zhang1-16/+48
Before a hotword is detected, GPIO1 pin is configured as IRQ output so that jack detect works. When a hotword is detected, the DSP firmware configures the GPIO1 pin as GPIO1 and drives a 1. rt5677_irq() is called after a rising edge on the GPIO1 pin, due to either jack detect event or hotword event, or both. All possible events are checked and handled in rt5677_irq() where GPIO1 pin is configured back to IRQ output if a hotword is detected. Signed-off-by: Ben Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-11ASoC: bdw-rt5677: Add a DAI link for rt5677 SPI PCM deviceBen Zhang1-0/+14
This link is needed for the RT5677 DSP to do hotwording Signed-off-by: Ben Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-11ASoC: rt5677: Load firmware via SPI using delayed workBen Zhang3-67/+253
The firmware rt5677_elf_vad is an ELF binary obtained from request_firmware(). Sections of the ELF are loaded to the DSP via SPI. A model (e.g. en_us.mmap) can optionally be loaded to the DSP at RT5677_MODEL_ADDR to overwrite the baked-in model in rt5677_elf_vad. Then we switch to DSP mode, load firmware, and let DSP run. When a hotword is detected, an interrupt is fired and rt5677_irq() is called. When 'DSP VAD Switch' is turned off, the codec is set back to normal mode. The kcontrol 'DSP VAD Switch' is automatically enabled/disabled when the hotwording PCM stream is opened/closed. Signed-off-by: Ben Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-11ASoC: fsl_audmix: Add spin lock to protect tdmsShengjiu Wang2-0/+7
Audmix support two substream, When two substream start to run, the trigger function may be called by two substream in same time, that the priv->tdms may be updated wrongly. The expected priv->tdms is 0x3, but sometimes the result is 0x2, or 0x1. Fixes: be1df61cf06e ("ASoC: fsl: Add Audio Mixer CPU DAI driver") Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1e706afe53fdd1fbbbc79277c48a98f8416ba873.1573458378.git.shengjiu.wang@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>
2019-11-08ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: set L1SEN on S0ix suspendKeyon Jie2-0/+18
Set L1SEN to make sure the system can enter S0ix, and restore it on resume. Signed-off-by: Keyon Jie <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-08ASoC: SOF: topology: fix missing NULL pointer checkKeyon Jie1-0/+5
Add check to avoid possible NULL pointer dereference issue. This issue was reported by static analysis tools, we didn't face this issue but we can't rule it out either as a false positive. Reported-by: Keqiao Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Keyon Jie <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-08ASoC: core: Fix compile warning with CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=nTakashi Iwai1-0/+2
Paper over a compile warning: sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1185:8: warning: unused variable ‘name’ Fixes: 0632fa042541 ("ASoC: core: Fix pcm code debugfs error") Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-07ASoC: fsi: switch to yaml base DocumentationKuninori Morimoto2-31/+76
This patch switches from .txt base to .yaml base Document for FSI. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-06ASoC: SOF: topology: Fix bytes control size checksDragos Tarcatu1-5/+6
When using the example SOF amp widget topology, KASAN dumps this when the AMP bytes kcontrol gets loaded: [ 9.579548] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sof_control_load+0x8cc/0xac0 [snd_sof] [ 9.588194] Write of size 40 at addr ffff8882314559dc by task systemd-udevd/2411 Fix that by rejecting the topology if the bytes data size > max_size Fixes: 311ce4fe7637d ("ASoC: SOF: Add support for loading topologies") Reviewed-by: Jaska Uimonen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tarcatu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-06Merge branch 'for-5.4' of ↵Mark Brown21-57/+122
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound into asoc-5.5
2019-11-06ASoC: soc-core: fixup dead-lock at snd_soc_unregister_component()Kuninori Morimoto1-5/+15
snd_soc_unregister_component() is calling snd_soc_lookup_component() under mutex_lock(). But, snd_soc_lookup_component() itself is using mutex_lock(), thus it will be dead-lock. This patch adds _nolocked version of it, and avoid dead-lock issue. Fixes: ac6a4dd3e9f0("ASoC: soc-core: use snd_soc_lookup_component() at snd_soc_unregister_component()") Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <[email protected]>" Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-06ASoC: soc-core: fix RIP warning on card removalPierre-Louis Bossart1-1/+3
SOF module load/unload tests show nasty recurring warnings: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1339 at sound/core/control.c:466 snd_ctl_remove+0xf0/0x100 [snd] RIP: 0010:snd_ctl_remove+0xf0/0x100 [snd] This regression was introduced by the removal of the call to soc_remove_link_components() before soc_card_free() is invoked. Go back to the initial order but only call soc_remove_link_components() once. Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Fixes: 5a4c9f054ceea ("ASoC: soc-core: snd_soc_unbind_card() cleanup") GitHub issue: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/1424 Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-06ASoC: SOF: topology: Fix bytes control size checksDragos Tarcatu1-5/+6
When using the example SOF amp widget topology, KASAN dumps this when the AMP bytes kcontrol gets loaded: [ 9.579548] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sof_control_load+0x8cc/0xac0 [snd_sof] [ 9.588194] Write of size 40 at addr ffff8882314559dc by task systemd-udevd/2411 Fix that by rejecting the topology if the bytes data size > max_size Fixes: 311ce4fe7637d ("ASoC: SOF: Add support for loading topologies") Reviewed-by: Jaska Uimonen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tarcatu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc.h: dobj is used only when SND_SOC_TOPOLOGYKuninori Morimoto1-1/+8
snd_soc_dobj is used only when SND_SOC_TOPOLOGY was selected. Let's enable it under SND_SOC_TOPOLOGY. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: remove topology specific operationKuninori Morimoto1-24/+4
soc-core has some API which is used from topology, but it is doing topology specific operation at soc-core. soc-core should care about core things, and topology should care about topology things, otherwise, it is very confusable. For example topology type is not related to soc-core, it is topology side issue. This patch removes meaningless check from soc-core. This patch keeps extra initialization/destruction at snd_soc_add_dai_link() / snd_soc_remove_dai_link() which were for topology. From this patch, non-topology card can use it. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: call snd_soc_register_dai() from snd_soc_register_dais()Kuninori Morimoto1-8/+8
ALSA SoC has 2 functions. snd_soc_register_dai() is used from topology snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component() In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais() with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar but different implementation. We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation. This patch calls snd_soc_register_dai() from snd_soc_register_dais() Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: don't call snd_soc_dapm_new_dai_widgets() at ↵Kuninori Morimoto3-28/+24
snd_soc_register_dai() ALSA SoC has 2 functions. snd_soc_register_dai() is used from topology snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component() In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais() with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar but different implementation. We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation. snd_soc_register_dai() is now used from topology. But to reduce duplicated code, it should be used from _dais(), too. Because of topology side specific reason, it is calling snd_soc_dapm_new_dai_widgets(), but it is not needed _dais() side. This patch factorizes snd_soc_register_dai() to topology / _dais() common part, and topology specific part. And do topology specific part at soc-topology. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: have legacy_dai_naming at snd_soc_register_dai()Kuninori Morimoto3-4/+6
ALSA SoC has 2 functions. snd_soc_register_dai() is used from topology snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component() In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais() with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar but different implementation. We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation. snd_soc_register_dai() is now used from topology. But to reduce duplicated code, it should be used from _dais(), too. To prepare it, this patch adds missing parameter legacy_dai_naming to snd_soc_register_dai(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_unregister_dai()Kuninori Morimoto2-5/+15
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and is difficult to debug. This patch adds missing soc_del_dai() and snd_soc_unregister_dai(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_unregister_dais()Kuninori Morimoto1-16/+16
This patch moves snd_soc_unregister_dais() next to snd_soc_register_dais(). This is prepare for snd_soc_register_dais() cleanup Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_register_dai()Kuninori Morimoto1-36/+36
This patch moves snd_soc_register_dai() next to snd_soc_register_dais(). This is prepare for snd_soc_register_dais() cleanup. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: use snd_soc_lookup_component() at snd_soc_unregister_component()Kuninori Morimoto1-15/+5
snd_soc_unregister_component() is now finding component manually, but we already have snd_soc_lookup_component() to find component; Let's use existing function. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: remove snd_soc_component_add/del()Kuninori Morimoto1-33/+25
soc-core has snd_soc_add_component(), snd_soc_component_add(), snd_soc_del_component(), snd_soc_component_del(). These are very confusing naming. snd_soc_component_xxx() are called from snd_soc_xxx_component(), and these are very small. Let's merge these into snd_soc_xxx_component(), and remove snd_soc_component_xxx(). Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_del_component_unlocked()Kuninori Morimoto1-11/+9
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and is difficult to debug. Now ALSA SoC has snd_soc_add_component(), but there is no paired snd_soc_del_component(). Thus, snd_soc_unregister_component() is calling cleanup function randomly. it is difficult to read. This patch adds missing snd_soc_del_component_unlocked() and balance up code. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: tidyup snd_soc_lookup_component()Kuninori Morimoto1-13/+10
snd_soc_lookup_component() is using mix of continue and break in the same loop. It is odd. This patch cleanup it. Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_lookup_component()Kuninori Morimoto1-26/+26
This patch moves snd_soc_lookup_component() to upper side. This is prepare for snd_soc_unregister_component() Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: add soc_unbind_dai_link()Kuninori Morimoto1-10/+12
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug. ALSA SoC has soc_bind_dai_link(), but its paired soc_unbind_dai_link() is not implemented. More confusable is that soc_remove_pcm_runtimes() which should be soc_unbind_dai_link() is implemented without synchronised to soc_bind_dai_link(). This patch cleanup this unbalance. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: call soc_bind_dai_link() under snd_soc_add_dai_link()Kuninori Morimoto1-17/+6
If we focus to soc_bind_dai_link() at snd_soc_instantiate_card(), we will notice very complex operation. static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(...) { ... /* * (1) Bind dai_link via card pre-linked dai_link * * Bind dai_link via card pre-linked. * 1 dai_link will be 1 rtd, and connected to card. * for_each_card_prelinks() is for card pre-linked dai_link. * * Image * * card * - rtd(A) * - rtd(A) */ for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link) { ret = soc_bind_dai_link(card, dai_link); ... } ... /* * (2) Connect card pre-linked dai_link to card list * * Connect all card pre-linked dai_link to *card list*. * Here, (A) means from card pre-linked. * * Image * * card card list * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - ... - ... */ for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link) { ret = snd_soc_add_dai_link(card, dai_link); ... } ... /* * (3) Probe binded component * * Each rtd has many components. * Here probes each rtd connected components. * rtd(A) in Image is the probe target. * * During this component probe, topology may add new dai_link to * *card list* by using snd_soc_add_dai_link() which is * used at (2). * Here, (B) means from topology * * Image * * card card list * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - ... - ... * - dai_link(B) * - dai_link(B) */ ret = soc_probe_link_components(card); ... /* * (4) Bind dai_link again * * Bind dai_link again for topology. * Note, (1) used for_each_card_prelinks(), * here is using for_each_card_links() * * This means from card list. * As Image indicating, it has dai_link(A) (from card pre-link) * and dai_link(B) (from topology). * main target here is dai_link(B). * soc_bind_dai_link() ignores already used * dai_link (= dai_link(A)) * * Image * * card card list * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - ... - ... * - rtd(B) - dai_link(B) * - rtd(B) - dai_link(B) */ for_each_card_links(card, dai_link) { ret = soc_bind_dai_link(card, dai_link); ... } ... } As you see above, it is doing very complex method. The problem is binding dai_link via "card pre-linked" (= (1)) and "topology added dai_link" (= (3)) are separated. The code can be simple if we can bind dai_link when dai_link is connected to *card list*. This patch do it. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: remove duplicated soc_is_dai_link_bound()Kuninori Morimoto1-3/+0
soc_is_dai_link_bound() check will be called both *before* soc_bind_dai_link() (A), and *under* soc_bind_dai_link() (B). These are very verbose code. Let's remove one of them. * static int soc_bind_dai_link(...) { ... (B) if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...)) { ... return 0; } ... } static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(...) { ... for_each_card_links(...) { (A) if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...)) continue; * ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...); if (ret) goto probe_end; } ... } Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: typo fix at soc_dai_link_sanity_check()Kuninori Morimoto1-1/+1
Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: tidyup soc_init_dai_link()Kuninori Morimoto1-15/+7
soc_init_dai_link() is needed to be called before soc_bind_dai_link(). int snd_soc_instantiate_card() { for_each_card_prelinks(...) { (1) ret = soc_init_dai_link(...); ... } ... for_each_card_prelinks(...) { (2) ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...); ... } ... for_each_card_links(...) { ... (A) ret = soc_init_dai_link(...); ... (B) ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...); } ... (1) is for (2), and (A) is for (B) (1) and (2) are for card prelink dai_link. (A) and (B) are for topology added dai_link. soc_init_dai_link() is sanity check for dai_link, not initializing today. Therefore, it is confusable naming. We can rename it as sanity_check. And this check is for soc_bind_dai_link(). It can be more simple code if we can call it from soc_bind_dai_link(). This patch renames it to soc_dai_link_sanity_check(), and call it from soc_bind_dai_link(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: soc-core: move soc_init_dai_link()Kuninori Morimoto1-96/+96
This patch moves soc_init_dai_link() next to soc_bind_dai_link(). This is prepare for soc_bind_dai_link() cleanup. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: adau7118: Fix example warningMaxime Ripard1-1/+1
The ADAU7118 has an example where the codec has an i2c address of 14, and the unit address set to 14 as well. However, while the address is expressed in decimal, the unit-address is supposed to be in hexadecimal, which ends up with two different addresses that trigger a DTC warning. Fix this by setting the address to 0x14. Cc: Nuno Sá <[email protected]> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]> Fixes: 969d49b2cdc8 ("dt-bindings: asoc: Add ADAU7118 documentation") Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: SOF: topology: set trigger order for FE DAI linkRanjani Sridharan1-0/+4
Set trigger order for FE DAI links to SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_POST to trigger the BE DAI's before the FE DAI's. This prevents the xruns seen on playback pipelines using the link DMA. Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: pcm: update FE/BE trigger order based on the commandRanjani Sridharan1-27/+68
Currently, the trigger orders SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_PRE/POST determine the order in which FE DAI and BE DAI are triggered. In the case of SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_PRE, the FE DAI is triggered before the BE DAI and in the case of SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_POST, the BE DAI is triggered before the FE DAI. And this order remains the same irrespective of the trigger command. In the case of the SOF driver, during playback, the FW expects the BE DAI to be triggered before the FE DAI during the START trigger. The BE DAI trigger handles the starting of Link DMA and so it must be started before the FE DAI is started to prevent xruns during pause/release. This can be addressed by setting the trigger order for the FE dai link to SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_POST. But during the STOP trigger, the FW expects the FE DAI to be triggered before the BE DAI. Retaining the same order during the START and STOP commands, results in FW error as the DAI component in the FW is still active. The issue can be fixed by mirroring the trigger order of FE and BE DAI's during the START and STOP trigger. So, with the trigger order set to SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_PRE, the FE DAI will be trigger first during SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START/STOP/RESUME and the BE DAI will be triggered first during the STOP/SUSPEND/PAUSE commands. Conversely, with the trigger order set to SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_POST, the BE DAI will be triggered first during the SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START/STOP/RESUME commands and the FE DAI will be triggered first during the SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP/SUSPEND/PAUSE commands. Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: max98373: replace gpio_request with devm_gpio_requestYong Zhi1-2/+2
Use devm_gpio_request() to automatic unroll when fails and avoid resource leaks at error paths. Signed-off-by: Yong Zhi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-05ASoC: stm32: sai: add restriction on mmap supportOlivier Moysan1-1/+11
Do not support mmap in S/PDIF mode. In S/PDIF mode the buffer has to be copied, to allow the channel status bits insertion. Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-04ASoC: Intel: boards: sof_rt5682: use dependency on SOF_HDA_LINKPierre-Louis Bossart1-3/+3
The wrong dependency is used and the build can be broken Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-04ASoC: Intel: boards: Geminilake is only supported by SOFPierre-Louis Bossart1-2/+2
Geminilake machine drivers are only tested and recommended with SOF. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-04ASoC: Intel: boards: fix configs for bxt-da7219-max98057aPierre-Louis Bossart2-3/+23
The same driver is reused for 3 different configurations, but the driver will only be build if ApolloLake is selected. Fix and make sure each device can work without dependencies on others (useful for minimal configurations). Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-04ASoC: Intel: boards: remove select SND_HDA_DSP_LOADERPierre-Louis Bossart1-3/+0
This option is only required with the Skylake platform driver, there is no reason to have this option in machine drivers. This is e.g. useless for SOF-based solutions. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-04ASoC: Intel: Skylake: mark HDAudio codec support as deprecated.Pierre-Louis Bossart1-3/+6
This option famously broke audio on Linus' laptop and the problem have not been fixed. Mark as DEPRECATED to avoid any ambiguity with distros. Use SOF if you need HDaudio support w/ the DSP enabled, e.g. for DMIC capture. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-04ASoC: SOF: Intel: use def_tristate, avoid using selectPierre-Louis Bossart2-4/+2
So far we used select to use the relevant built-in/module options, but this led to blurring layers between core and Intel Kconfigs. Use def_tristate works just as well and removes Intel stuff from the code. Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-04ASoC: SOF: imx: fix reverse CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_OF dependencyPierre-Louis Bossart1-2/+6
updated solution to the problem reported with randconfig: CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_IMX depends on CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF, but is in turn referenced by the sof-of-dev driver. This creates a reverse dependency that manifests in a link error when CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_OF is built-in but CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_IMX=m: sound/soc/sof/sof-of-dev.o:(.data+0x118): undefined reference to `sof_imx8_ops' use def_trisate to propagate the right settings without select. Fixes: f4df4e4042b0 ("ASoC: SOF: imx8: Fix COMPILE_TEST error") Fixes: 202acc565a1f ("ASoC: SOF: imx: Add i.MX8 HW support") Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-04ASoC: SOF: Kconfig: add EXPERT dependency for developer options, clarify helpPierre-Louis Bossart1-9/+16
Some distros select all possible options, despite existing warnings to be careful. This leads to e.g. user reports that the HDaudio codec and DMIC are not handled by SOF. Add an explicit menu item to unlock developer options, and make them dependent on CONFIG_EXPERT. Hopefully with this double-lock these options will only be selected by developers. GitHub issue: https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/issues/1885 Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-04ASoC: Intel: add mutual exclusion between SOF and legacy Baytrail driverPierre-Louis Bossart1-1/+1
This legacy driver is already deprecated, let's make sure there is no conflict with SOF. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-11-04ASoC: SOF: Intel: Broadwell: clarify mutual exclusion with legacy driverPierre-Louis Bossart2-1/+12
Some distros select all options blindly, which leads to confusion and bug reports. SOF does not fully support Broadwell due to firmware dependencies, the machine drivers can only support one option, and UCM/topology files are still being propagated to downstream distros, so make SOF on Broadwell an opt-in option that first require distros to opt-out of existing defaults. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204237 Fixes: f35bf70f61d3 ('ASoC: Intel: Make sure BDW based machine drivers build for SOF') Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>