| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level parameter to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing
show_stack_loglvl()
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
The pmode parameter isn't used in assembly - remove it. Second argument
will be reused for printk() log level.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
`sp' is a needless excercise here.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level parameter to show_trace() as a preparation to introduce
show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to printk_address() as a preparation to introduce
show_stack_loglvl().
As a good side-effect show_fault_oops() now prints the address with
KERN_EMREG as the rest of output, making sure there won't be situation
where "PC: " is printed without actual address.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently `data' is always an empty line "". No need for additional
printk() call.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to dump_mem() as a preparation to introduce
show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> (powerpc)
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]>
Cc: Stafford Horne <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Greentime Hu <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Chen <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: James Hogan <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Burton <[email protected]>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level parameter to microblaze_unwind() as a preparation to add
show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to microblaze_unwind_inner() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to ia64_do_show_stack() as a preparation to
introduce show_stack_loglvl(). Also, make ia64_do_show_stack() static as
it's not used outside.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
As a good side-effect die() now prints the stacktrace with KERN_EMERG
aligned with other messages.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Brian Cain <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Now that c_backtrace() always emits correct loglvl, use it for printing.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().
As a good side-effect __die() now prints not only "Stack:" header with
KERN_EMERG, but the backtrace itself.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to unwind_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().
As a good side-effect arm_syscall() is now printing errors with the same
log level as the backtrace.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Add log level argument to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing
show_stack_loglvl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
As a good side-effect header "Stack Trace:" is now printed with the same
log level as the rest of backtrace.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Patch series "Add log level to show_stack()", v3.
Add log level argument to show_stack().
Done in three stages:
1. Introducing show_stack_loglvl() for every architecture
2. Migrating old users with an explicit log level
3. Renaming show_stack_loglvl() into show_stack()
Justification:
- It's a design mistake to move a business-logic decision into platform
realization detail.
- I have currently two patches sets that would benefit from this work:
Removing console_loglevel jumps in sysrq driver [1] Hung task warning
before panic [2] - suggested by Tetsuo (but he probably didn't realise
what it would involve).
- While doing (1), (2) the backtraces were adjusted to headers and other
messages for each situation - so there won't be a situation when the
backtrace is printed, but the headers are missing because they have
lesser log level (or the reverse).
- As the result in (2) plays with console_loglevel for kdb are removed.
The least important for upstream, but maybe still worth to note that every
company I've worked in so far had an off-list patch to print backtrace
with the needed log level (but only for the architecture they cared
about). If you have other ideas how you will benefit from show_stack()
with a log level - please, reply to this cover letter.
See also discussion on v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/
This patch (of 50):
print_ip_sym() needs to have a log level parameter to comply with other
parts being printed. Otherwise, half of the expected backtrace would be
printed and other may be missing with some logging level.
The following callee(s) are using now the adjusted log level:
- microblaze/unwind: the same level as headers & userspace unwind.
Note that pr_debug()'s there are for debugging the unwinder itself.
- nds32/traps: symbol addresses are printed with the same log level
as backtrace headers.
- lockdep: ip for locking issues is printed with the same log level
as other part of the warning.
- sched: ip where preemption was disabled is printed as error like
the rest part of the message.
- ftrace: bug reports are now consistent in the log level being used.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
Cc: Albert Ou <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Segall <[email protected]>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]>
Cc: Greentime Hu <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: James Hogan <[email protected]>
Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Burton <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Chen <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Cc: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]>
Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Cain <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]>
Cc: Stafford Horne <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Zankel <[email protected]>
Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]>
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Cc: Jason Wessel <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 srbds fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
"The 9th episode of the dime novel "The performance killer" with the
subtitle "Slow Randomizing Boosts Denial of Service".
SRBDS is an MDS-like speculative side channel that can leak bits from
the random number generator (RNG) across cores and threads. New
microcode serializes the processor access during the execution of
RDRAND and RDSEED. This ensures that the shared buffer is overwritten
before it is released for reuse. This is equivalent to a full bus
lock, which means that many threads running the RNG instructions in
parallel have the same effect as the same amount of threads issuing a
locked instruction targeting an address which requires locking of two
cachelines at once.
The mitigation support comes with the usual pile of unpleasant
ingredients:
- command line options
- sysfs file
- microcode checks
- a list of vulnerable CPUs identified by model and stepping this
time which requires stepping match support for the cpu match logic.
- the inevitable slowdown of affected CPUs"
* branch 'x86/srbds' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/speculation: Add Ivy Bridge to affected list
x86/speculation: Add SRBDS vulnerability and mitigation documentation
x86/speculation: Add Special Register Buffer Data Sampling (SRBDS) mitigation
x86/cpu: Add 'table' argument to cpu_matches()
|
|
Fix afs_compare_addrs() to use WARN_ON(1) instead of BUG() and return 1
(ie. srx_a > srx_b).
There's no point trying to put actual error handling in as this should not
occur unless a new transport address type is allowed by AFS. And even if
it does, in this particular case, it'll just never match unknown types of
addresses. This BUG() was more of a 'you need to add a case here'
indicator.
Reported-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
|
|
Fix AFS file locking to use the correct vnode pointer and remove a member
of the afs_operation struct that is never set, but it is read and followed,
causing an oops.
This can be triggered by:
flock -s /afs/example.com/foo sleep 1
when it calls the kernel to get a file lock.
Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept")
Reported-by: Dave Botsch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Dave Botsch <[email protected]>
|
|
Fix afs_put_sysnames() to actually free the specified afs_sysnames
object after its reference count has been decreased to zero and
its contents have been released.
Fixes: 6f8880d8e681557 ("afs: Implement @sys substitution handling")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
|
|
Pass a flag to request kernel thread use.
Fixes: 01fcb1cbc88e ("vhost: allow device that does not depend on vhost worker")
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
|
|
If subblock size is large (e.g. 1G) 32 bit math involving it
can overflow. Rather than try to catch all instances of that,
let's tweak block size to 64 bit.
It ripples through UAPI which is an ABI change, but it's not too late to
make it, and it will allow supporting >4Gbyte blocks while might
become necessary down the road.
Fixes: 5f1f79bbc9e26 ("virtio-mem: Paravirtualized memory hotplug")
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
|
|
This code calls brelse(bh) and then dereferences "bh" on the next line
resulting in a possible use after free. The brelse() should just be
moved down a line.
Fixes: b676fdbcf4c8 ("exfat: standardize checksum calculation")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
|
|
There is check error in range condition that can never be entered
even with invalid input.
Replace incorrent checking code with already existing valid checker.
Signed-off-by: hyeongseok.kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
|
|
At truncate, there is a problem of incorrect updating in the file entry
pointer instead of stream entry. This will cause the problem of
overwriting the time field of the file entry to new_size. Fix it to
update stream entry.
Fixes: 98d917047e8b ("exfat: add file operations")
Cc: [email protected] # v5.7
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
|
|
butt3rflyh4ck reported memory leak found by syzkaller.
A param->string held by exfat_mount_options.
BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff88801972e090 (size 8):
comm "syz-executor.2", pid 16298, jiffies 4295172466 (age 14.060s)
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
6b 6f 69 38 2d 75 00 00 koi8-u..
backtrace:
[<000000005bfe35d6>] kstrdup+0x36/0x70 mm/util.c:60
[<0000000018ed3277>] exfat_parse_param+0x160/0x5e0
fs/exfat/super.c:276
[<000000007680462b>] vfs_parse_fs_param+0x2b4/0x610
fs/fs_context.c:147
[<0000000097c027f2>] vfs_parse_fs_string+0xe6/0x150
fs/fs_context.c:191
[<00000000371bf78f>] generic_parse_monolithic+0x16f/0x1f0
fs/fs_context.c:231
[<000000005ce5eb1b>] do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2812 [inline]
[<000000005ce5eb1b>] do_mount+0x12bb/0x1b30 fs/namespace.c:3141
[<00000000b642040c>] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3350 [inline]
[<00000000b642040c>] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3327 [inline]
[<00000000b642040c>] __x64_sys_mount+0x18f/0x230 fs/namespace.c:3327
[<000000003b024e98>] do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x7d0
arch/x86/entry/common.c:295
[<00000000ce2b698c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3
exfat_free() should call exfat_free_iocharset(), to prevent a leak
in case we fail after parsing iocharset= but before calling
get_tree_bdev().
Additionally, there's no point copying param->string in
exfat_parse_param() - just steal it, leaving NULL in param->string.
That's independent from the leak or fix thereof - it's simply
avoiding an extra copy.
Fixes: 719c1e182916 ("exfat: add super block operations")
Cc: [email protected] # v5.7
Reported-by: butt3rflyh4ck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
|
|
kbuild test robot reported :
fs/exfat/nls.c:531:22: warning: Variable 'p_uniname->name_len'
is reassigned a value before the old one has been used.
The reassignment of p_uniname->name_len is not needed and remove it.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
|
|
To clarify that it is a 16-bit checksum, the parts related to the 16-bit
checksum are renamed and change type to u16.
Furthermore, replace checksum calculation in exfat_load_upcase_table()
with exfat_calc_checksum32().
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
|