aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: trimslice: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+5
commit 567b374d9973 ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 567b374d9973 ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 5d62677238e9 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 5d62677238e9 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit b28d98527157 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit b28d98527157 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 404b229b84af ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 404b229b84af ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+6
commit cee1cf3f9f9e ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit cee1cf3f9f9e ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+5
commit d035d13b2277 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit d035d13b2277 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 1d641e1523ca ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 1d641e1523ca ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 4bfd08540b44 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 4bfd08540b44 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+6
commit e7fc99e641da ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit e7fc99e641da ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 3f780533bac9 ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 3f780533bac9 ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit e562a5f13c94 ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit e562a5f13c94 ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-3/+9
commit ae7cbcc43b8c ("ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit ae7cbcc43b8c ("ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: snow: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-3/+7
commit a555b6a959e6 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit a555b6a959e6 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-2/+7
commit d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+5
commit 33949eb5019d ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 33949eb5019d ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 27a37973a6f1 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 27a37973a6f1 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 7df405ae5895 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 7df405ae5895 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 9c21e82c165c ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 9c21e82c165c ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: qcom: storm: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+3
commit 3caf11fa88a9 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 3caf11fa88a9 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-3/+7
commit 564684387969 ("ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 564684387969 ("ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-2/+6
commit 5f92229d184b ("ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 5f92229d184b ("ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-3/+9
commit 717f16331712 ("ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 717f16331712 ("ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-4/+10
commit d8893261a7d32 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit d8893261a7d32 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 014f07ca1cb12 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 014f07ca1cb12 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 82bf78ca49a3 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 82bf78ca49a3 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 577cf50d4dc8 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 577cf50d4dc8 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+5
commit e57a4c2f15df27 ("ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit e57a4c2f15df27 ("ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 2058ea1c4f514a ("ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 2058ea1c4f514a ("ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+3
commit 655368dfc75e8 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 655368dfc75e8 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit ced5b08020cd ("ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit ced5b08020cd ("ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit bfc7938e58142a5 ("ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit bfc7938e58142a5 ("ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: amtel: mikroe-proto: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-2/+5
commit 318ebbe8060d96 ("ASoC: atmel: mikroe-proto: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 318ebbe8060d96 ("ASoC: atmel: mikroe-proto: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: consider CPU-Platform possibility unnecessary ↵Kuninori Morimoto1-1/+3
Platform" commit 3609750e9d4ba9db ("ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 3609750e9d4ba9db ("ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 7baf32e164da5d4 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 7baf32e164da5d4 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-1/+4
commit 02602401e5316 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 02602401e5316 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: vc4: vc4_htmi: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto1-0/+4
commit 6c6de1c9e2bf2 ("ASoC: vc4: vc4_hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 6c6de1c9e2bf2 ("ASoC: vc4: vc4_hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: topology: fix memory leaks on sm, se and sbeColin Ian King1-3/+3
Currently when a kstrdup fails the error exit paths don't free the allocations for sm, se and sbe. This can be fixed by assigning kc[i].private_value to these before doing the ksrtdup so that the error exit path will be able to free these objects. Addresses-Coverity: ("Resource leak") Fixes: 9f90af3a9952 ("ASoC: topology: Consolidate and fix asoc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create flow") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: atmel-pcm-dma.c: use devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register()Kuninori Morimoto4-31/+2
We have devm_xxx version of snd_dmaengine_pcm_register, let's use it. This patch also removes related empty functions Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: meson: axg-card: remove useless check on codecJerome Brunet1-2/+1
While checking cpus before dereferencing the pointer is required, it is not necessary for codecs. 'codec' can't possibly be NULL in the loop Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: soc-core: support dai_link with platforms_num != 1Jerome Brunet2-35/+30
Add support platforms_num != 1 in dai_link. Initially, the main purpose of this change was to make the platform optional in the dai_link, instead of inserting the dummy platform driver. This particular case had just been solved by Kuninori Morimoto with commit 1d7689892878 ("ASoC: soc-core: allow no Platform on dai_link"). However, this change may still be useful for those who need multiple platform components on a single dai_link (it solves one of the FIXME note in soc-core) Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: soc-core: defer card registration if codec component is missingJerome Brunet1-0/+8
Like cpus and platforms, defer sound card initialization if the codec component is missing when initializing the dai_link Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: codecs: ad193x: Reset used registers at probeCodrin Ciubotariu1-0/+10
Since the ad193x codecs have no software reset, we have to reinitialize the registers after a hardware reset to assure no previous values are kept. Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-28ASoC: codecs: ad193x: Group register initialization at probeCodrin Ciubotariu1-19/+33
Create a structure with the register initialization values at probe and use it to initialize all the registers at once. Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-26Merge tag 'v5.2-rc6' into asoc-5.3Mark Brown22568-153902/+38036
Linux 5.2-rc6
2019-06-26ASoC: soc-core: don't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()Kuninori Morimoto1-2/+11
commit b9f2e25c599bb ("ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()") used soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai(), but, some CPU driver has CPU component for DAI and Platform component, for example generic DMAEngine component. In such case, CPU component and Platform component have same of_node / name. Here soc_find_component() returns *1st* found component. Thus, we shouldn't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai(). This patch fixup this it, and add comment to indicate this limitation. Fixes: commit b9f2e25c599bb ("ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()") Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-26ASoC: rsnd: add missing pin sharing with SSI9Kuninori Morimoto2-0/+2
When SSI9 is sharing pin with SSI0, we need to care about it, but is missing. This patch fixup it. Reported-by: Hien Dang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Tested-by: Chaoliang Qin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-26ASoC: rsnd: ssiu: tidyup SSI_MODE1/2 settingsKuninori Morimoto1-48/+44
R-Car Sound can use pin sharing and multi-SSI for SSI0/1/2/3/4/9. Because complex HW settings and spaghetti code, the settings for SSI9 pin sharing with SSI0 doesn't work. This patch tidyup settings for it. Reported-by: Hien Dang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]> Tested-by: Chaoliang Qin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-26ASoC: madera: Update SPDX headersCharles Keepax7-35/+7
The madera driver was merged too late to catch Thomas Gleixner's cleanup of the SPDX headers tree wide. Update the headers to match what was done in that patch. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-25ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Strip T and L from TLV IPCsKamil Lulko1-13/+9
cAVS modules do not require Type and Length header within the set_module_params IPC. This is also true for Vendor modules. The userspace (like tinymix) always appends this header to TLV controls which are used for set_module_params. Simply assume this header is always present in the payload and omit it from the IPC. Signed-off-by: Kamil Lulko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
2019-06-25ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Reset pipeline before its deletionAmadeusz Sławiński1-7/+16
Before actual deletion, pipeline should enter RESET state. Currently, pipe skips this checkpoint and goes straight to the finish line. This is not the expected path by the FW, so correct it. Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Powered by cgit, Gruvboxed by Blaster4385.