aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Kerello <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christophe Kerello <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: socrates: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: socrates: Fix the probe error pathMiquel Raynal1-1/+1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: sharpsl: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-3/+9
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: sharpsl: Fix the probe error pathMiquel Raynal1-1/+1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense. Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: sh_flctl: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: s3c2410: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+2
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: r852: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-2/+4
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: qcom: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-3/+8
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: plat_nand: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: plat_nand: Fix the probe error pathMiquel Raynal1-1/+1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: pasemi: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+4
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: pasemi: Fix the probe error pathMiquel Raynal1-1/+3
nand_cleanup() is supposed to be called on error after a successful call to nand_scan() to free all NAND resources. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: oxnas: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+2
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: oxnas: Release all devices in the _remove() pathMiquel Raynal1-2/+6
oxnans_nand_remove() should release all MTD devices and clean all NAND devices, not only the first one registered. Fixes: 668592492409 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: oxnas: Unregister all devices on errorMiquel Raynal1-0/+8
On error, the oxnas probe path just frees the device which failed and aborts the probe, leaving unreleased resources. Fix this situation by calling mtd_device_unregister()/nand_cleanup() on these. Fixes: 668592492409 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: oxnas: Fix the probe error pathMiquel Raynal1-4/+4
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. While at it, be consistent and move the function call in the error path thanks to a goto statement. Fixes: 668592492409 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: oxnas: Keep track of registered devicesMiquel Raynal1-4/+4
All initialized and registered devices should be listed somewhere so that we can unregister/free them in the _remove() path. This patch is not a fix per-se but is needed to apply three other fixes coming right after, explaining the Fixes/Cc: stable tags. Fixes: 668592492409 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: orion: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: orion: Fix the probe error pathMiquel Raynal1-1/+1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: omap2: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-2/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: ndfc: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-2/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: mxic: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: mxc: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: mtk: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-5/+10
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: mtk: Fix the probe error pathMiquel Raynal1-1/+1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: mpc5121: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+4
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: marvell: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: lpc32xx_slc: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: lpc32xx_mlc: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-5/+10
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Cercueil <[email protected]> Cc: Harvey Hunt <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Fix the probe error pathMiquel Raynal1-1/+1
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. Hence, pointing it as the commit to fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing any bug makes sense. Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Paul Cercueil <[email protected]> Cc: Harvey Hunt <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: hisi504: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: gpmi: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: Han Xu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: gpio: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: fsmc: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: fsl_upm: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-3/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: fsl_ifc: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: fsl_elbc: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: diskonchip: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+4
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: diskonchip: Fix the probe error pathMiquel Raynal1-5/+2
Not sure nand_cleanup() is the right function to call here but in any case it is not nand_release(). Indeed, even a comment says that calling nand_release() is a bit of a hack as there is no MTD device to unregister. So switch to nand_cleanup() for now and drop this comment. There is no Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if it did not intruce any bug. Fixes: d44154f969a4 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: denali: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: denali: Delete items from the list in the _remove() pathMiquel Raynal1-2/+4
Denali driver keeps track of devices with a list. Delete items of this list as long as they are not in use anymore. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: davinci: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: cs553x: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+4
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: cafe: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+4
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: cadence: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+6
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-2/+8
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Cc: Kamal Dasu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: bcm47xx: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
2020-05-31mtd: rawnand: au1550nd: Stop using nand_release()Miquel Raynal1-1/+5
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
Powered by cgit, Gruvboxed by Blaster4385.