| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The rt_mutex based ww_mutex variant queues the new waiter first in the
lock's rbtree before evaluating the ww_mutex specific conditions which
might decide that the waiter should back out. This check and conditional
exit happens before the waiter is enqueued into the PI chain.
The failure handling at the call site assumes that the waiter, if it is the
top most waiter on the lock, is queued in the PI chain and then proceeds to
adjust the unmodified PI chain, which results in RB tree corruption.
Dequeue the waiter from the lock waiter list in the ww_mutex error exit
path to prevent this.
Fixes: add461325ec5 ("locking/rtmutex: Extend the rtmutex core to support ww_mutex")
Reported-by: Sebastian Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The new rt_mutex_spin_on_onwer() loop checks whether the spinning waiter is
still the top waiter on the lock by utilizing rt_mutex_top_waiter(), which
is broken because that function contains a sanity check which dereferences
the top waiter pointer to check whether the waiter belongs to the
lock. That's wrong in the lockless spinwait case:
CPU 0 CPU 1
rt_mutex_lock(lock) rt_mutex_lock(lock);
queue(waiter0)
waiter0 == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)
rt_mutex_spin_on_onwer(lock, waiter0) { queue(waiter1)
waiter1 == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)
...
top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)
leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters);
-> signal
dequeue(waiter1)
destroy(waiter1)
w = rb_entry(leftmost, ....)
BUG_ON(w->lock != lock) <- UAF
The BUG_ON() is correct for the case where the caller holds lock->wait_lock
which guarantees that the leftmost waiter entry cannot vanish. For the
lockless spinwait case it's broken.
Create a new helper function which avoids the pointer dereference and just
compares the leftmost entry pointer with current's waiter pointer to
validate that currrent is still elegible for spinning.
Fixes: 992caf7f1724 ("locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism")
Reported-by: Sebastian Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Semaphore is sleeping lock. Add might_sleep() to down*() family
(with exception of down_trylock()) to detect atomic context sleep.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The consolidation of the debug code for mutex waiter intialization sets
waiter::ww_ctx to a poison value unconditionally. For regular mutexes this
is intended to catch the case where waiter_ww_ctx is dereferenced
accidentally.
For ww_mutex the poison value has to be overwritten either with a context
pointer or NULL for ww_mutexes without context.
The rework broke this as it made the store conditional on the context
pointer instead of the argument which signals whether ww_mutex code should
be compiled in or optiized out. As a result waiter::ww_ctx ends up with the
poison pointer for contextless ww_mutexes which causes a later dereference of
the poison pointer because it is != NULL.
Use the build argument instead so for ww_mutex the poison value is always
overwritten.
Fixes: c0afb0ffc06e6 ("locking/ww_mutex: Gather mutex_waiter initialization")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Update the comment with the new features.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
On PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels local_lock maps to a per CPU 'sleeping'
spinlock which protects the critical section while staying preemptible. CPU
locality is established by disabling migration.
Provide the necessary types and macros to substitute the non-RT variant.
Co-developed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Add the static and runtime initializer mechanics to support the RT variant
of local_lock, which requires the lock type in the lockdep map to be set
to LD_LOCK_PERCPU.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Going to sleep when locks are contended can be quite inefficient when the
contention time is short and the lock owner is running on a different CPU.
The MCS mechanism cannot be used because MCS is strictly FIFO ordered while
for rtmutex based locks the waiter ordering is priority based.
Provide a simple adaptive spinwait mechanism which currently restricts the
spinning to the top priority waiter.
[ tglx: Provide a contemporary changelog, extended it to all rtmutex based
locks and updated it to match the other spin on owner implementations ]
Originally-by: Gregory Haskins <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The current logic only allows lock stealing to occur if the current task is
of higher priority than the pending owner.
Significant throughput improvements can be gained by allowing the lock
stealing to include tasks of equal priority when the contended lock is a
spin_lock or a rw_lock and the tasks are not in a RT scheduling task.
The assumption was that the system will make faster progress by allowing
the task already on the CPU to take the lock rather than waiting for the
system to wake up a different task.
This does add a degree of unfairness, but in reality no negative side
effects have been observed in the many years that this has been used in the
RT kernel.
[ tglx: Refactored and rewritten several times by Steve Rostedt, Sebastian
Siewior and myself ]
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
On PREEMPT_RT regular spinlocks and rwlocks are substituted with rtmutex
based constructs. spin/rwlock held regions are preemptible on PREEMPT_RT,
so PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET has to be 0 to make the various cond_resched_*lock()
functions work correctly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
On PREEMPT_RT the futex hashbucket spinlock becomes 'sleeping' and rtmutex
based. That causes a lockdep false positive because some of the futex
functions invoke spin_unlock(&hb->lock) with the wait_lock of the rtmutex
associated to the pi_futex held. spin_unlock() in turn takes wait_lock of
the rtmutex on which the spinlock is based which makes lockdep notice a
lock recursion.
Give the futex/rtmutex wait_lock a separate key.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The requeue_pi() operation on RT kernels creates a problem versus the
task::pi_blocked_on state when a waiter is woken early (signal, timeout)
and that early wake up interleaves with the requeue_pi() operation.
When the requeue manages to block the waiter on the rtmutex which is
associated to the second futex, then a concurrent early wakeup of that
waiter faces the problem that it has to acquire the hash bucket spinlock,
which is not an issue on non-RT kernels, but on RT kernels spinlocks are
substituted by 'sleeping' spinlocks based on rtmutex. If the hash bucket
lock is contended then blocking on that spinlock would result in a
impossible situation: blocking on two locks at the same time (the hash
bucket lock and the rtmutex representing the PI futex).
It was considered to make the hash bucket locks raw_spinlocks, but
especially requeue operations with a large amount of waiters can introduce
significant latencies, so that's not an option for RT.
The RT tree carried a solution which (ab)used task::pi_blocked_on to store
the information about an ongoing requeue and an early wakeup which worked,
but required to add checks for these special states all over the place.
The distangling of an early wakeup of a waiter for a requeue_pi() operation
is already looking at quite some different states and the task::pi_blocked_on
magic just expanded that to a hard to understand 'state machine'.
This can be avoided by keeping track of the waiter/requeue state in the
futex_q object itself.
Add a requeue_state field to struct futex_q with the following possible
states:
Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE
Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE
Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS
Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT
Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE
Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED
The waiter starts with state = NONE and the following state transitions are
valid:
On the waiter side:
Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE
Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT
On the requeue side:
Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_INPROGRESS
Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE/LOCKED
Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE (requeue failed)
Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE/LOCKED
Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE (requeue failed)
The requeue side ignores a waiter with state Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE as this
signals that the waiter is already on the way out. It also means that
the waiter is still on the 'wait' futex, i.e. uaddr1.
The waiter side signals early wakeup to the requeue side either through
setting state to Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE or to Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT depending
on the current state. In case of Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE it can immediately
proceed to take the hash bucket lock of uaddr1. If it set state to WAIT,
which means the wakeup is interleaving with a requeue in progress it has
to wait for the requeue side to change the state. Either to DONE/LOCKED
or to IGNORE. DONE/LOCKED means the waiter q is now on the uaddr2 futex
and either blocked (DONE) or has acquired it (LOCKED). IGNORE is set by
the requeue side when the requeue attempt failed via deadlock detection
and therefore the waiter's futex_q is still on the uaddr1 futex.
While this is not strictly required on !RT making this unconditional has
the benefit of common code and it also allows the waiter to avoid taking
the hash bucket lock on the way out in certain cases, which reduces
contention.
Add the required helpers required for the state transitions, invoke them at
the right places and restructure the futex_wait_requeue_pi() code to handle
the return from wait (early or not) based on the state machine values.
On !RT enabled kernels the waiter spin waits for the state going from
Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT to some other state, on RT enabled kernels this is
handled by rcuwait_wait_event() and the corresponding wake up on the
requeue side.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Move the futex key match out of handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup() which
allows to simplify that function. The upcoming state machine for
requeue_pi() will make that go away.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
No point in allocating memory when the input parameters are bogus.
Validate all parameters before proceeding.
Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The comment about the restriction of the number of waiters to wake for the
REQUEUE_PI case is confusing at best. Rewrite it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
No point in taking two more 'requeue_pi' conditionals just to get to the
requeue. Same for the requeue_pi case just the other way round.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The accounting is wrong when either the PI sanity check or the
requeue PI operation fails. Adjust it in the failure path.
Will be simplified in the next step.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
For requeue PI it's required to establish PI state for the PI futex to
which waiters are requeued. This either acquires the user space futex on
behalf of the top most waiter on the inner 'waitqueue' futex, or attaches to
the PI state of an existing waiter, or creates on attached to the owner of
the futex.
This code can retry in case of failure, but retry can never happen when the
pi state was successfully created. The condition to run this code is:
(task_count - nr_wake) < nr_requeue
which is always true because:
task_count = 0
nr_wake = 1
nr_requeue >= 0
Remove it completely.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
When requeuing to a PI futex, then the requeue code tries to trylock the PI
futex on behalf of the topmost waiter on the inner 'waitqueue' futex. If
that succeeds, then PI state has to be allocated in order to requeue further
waiters to the PI futex.
The comment and the code are confusing, as the PI state allocation uses
lookup_pi_state(), which either attaches to an existing waiter or to the
owner. As the PI futex was just acquired, there cannot be a waiter on the
PI futex because the hash bucket lock is held.
Clarify the comment and use attach_to_pi_owner() directly. As the task on
which behalf the PI futex has been acquired is guaranteed to be alive and
not exiting, this call must succeed. Add a WARN_ON() in case that fails.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The futex key reference mechanism is long gone. Clean up the stale comments
which still mention it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The loop in futex_requeue() has a sanity check for the waiter, which is
missing in futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(). In theory the key2 check is
sufficient, but futexes are cursed so add it for completeness and paranoia
sake.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The inner parts of certain locks (mutex, rwlocks) changed due to a rework for
RT and non RT code. Most users remain unaffected, but those who fiddle around
in the inner parts need to be updated.
Match the struct names to the new layout.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Add the necessary defines, helpers and API functions for replacing struct mutex on
a PREEMPT_RT enabled kernel with an rtmutex based variant.
No functional change when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=n
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Add the actual ww_mutex API functions which replace the mutex based variant
on RT enabled kernels.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Add a ww acquire context pointer to the waiter and various functions and
add the ww_mutex related invocations to the proper spots in the locking
code, similar to the mutex based variant.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Provide the defines for RT mutex based ww_mutexes and fix up the debug logic
so it's either enabled by DEBUG_MUTEXES or DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES on RT kernels.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
RT mutex based ww_mutexes cannot order based on timestamps. They have to
order based on priority. Add the necessary decision logic.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Provide the type defines and the helper inlines for rtmutex based ww_mutexes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Accessing the internal wait_lock of mutex and rtmutex is slightly
different. Provide helper functions for that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Some ww_mutex helper functions use pointers for the underlying mutex and
mutex_waiter. The upcoming rtmutex based implementation needs to share
these functions. Add and use defines for the types and replace the direct
types in the affected functions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Move the mutex related access from various ww_mutex functions into helper
functions so they can be substituted for rtmutex based ww_mutex later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The upcoming rtmutex based ww_mutex needs a different handling for
enqueueing a waiter. Split it out into a helper function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Split out the waiter iteration functions so they can be substituted for a
rtmutex based ww_mutex later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
None of these functions will be on the stack when blocking in
schedule(), hence __sched is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
Split the W/W mutex helper functions out into a separate header file, so
they can be shared with a rtmutex based variant later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Split the ww related part out into a helper function so it can be reused
for a rtmutex based ww_mutex implementation.
[ mingo: Fixed bisection failure. ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The wait_lock of mutex is really a low level lock. Convert it to a
raw_spinlock like the wait_lock of rtmutex.
[ mingo: backmerged the test_lockup.c build fix by bigeasy. ]
Co-developed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
<linux/ww_mutex.h>
Move the ww_mutex definitions into the ww_mutex specific header where they
belong.
Preparatory change to allow compiling ww_mutexes standalone.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
<linux/mutex.h> to the internal header
Move the mutex waiter declaration from the public <linux/mutex.h> header
to the internal kernel/locking/mutex.h header.
There is no reason to expose it outside of the core code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Having two header files which contain just the non-debug and debug variants
is mostly waste of disc space and has no real value. Stick the debug
variants into the common mutex.h file as counterpart to the stubs for the
non-debug case.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Ensure all !RT tasks have the same prio such that they end up in FIFO
order and aren't split up according to nice level.
The reason why nice levels were taken into account so far is historical. In
the early days of the rtmutex code it was done to give the PI boosting and
deboosting a larger coverage.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Similar to rw_semaphores, on RT the rwlock substitution is not writer fair,
because it's not feasible to have a writer inherit its priority to
multiple readers. Readers blocked on a writer follow the normal rules of
priority inheritance. Like RT spinlocks, RT rwlocks are state preserving
across the slow lock operations (contended case).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Provide the actual locking functions which make use of the general and
spinlock specific rtmutex code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
A simplified version of the rtmutex slowlock function, which neither handles
signals nor timeouts, and is careful about preserving the state of the
blocked task across the lock operation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Provide the necessary wrappers around the actual rtmutex based spinlock
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
RT replaces spinlocks with a simple wrapper around an rtmutex, which turns
spinlocks on RT into 'sleeping' spinlocks. The actual implementation of the
spinlock API differs from a regular rtmutex, as it does neither handle
timeouts nor signals and it is state preserving across the lock operation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
<linux/rbtree_types.h>
We have the following header dependency problem on RT:
- <linux/rtmutex.h> needs the definition of 'struct rb_root_cached'.
- <linux/rbtree.h> includes <linux/kernel.h>, which includes <linux/spinlock.h>
That works nicely for non-RT enabled kernels, but on RT enabled kernels
spinlocks are based on rtmutexes, which creates another circular header
dependency as <linux/spinlocks.h> will require <linux/rtmutex.h>.
Include <linux/rbtree_types.h> instead.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
So we have this header dependency problem on RT:
- <linux/rtmutex.h> needs the definition of 'struct rb_root_cached'.
- <linux/rbtree.h> includes <linux/kernel.h>, which includes <linux/spinlock.h>.
That works nicely for non-RT enabled kernels, but on RT enabled kernels
spinlocks are based on rtmutexes, which creates another circular header
dependency, as <linux/spinlocks.h> will require <linux/rtmutex.h>.
Split out the type definitions and move them into their own header file so
the rtmutex header can include just those.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|