aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Retrieve cores per package from topology bitmapsThomas Gleixner3-15/+57
Similar to other sizing information the number of cores per package can be established from the topology bitmap. Provide a function for retrieving that information and replace the buggy hack in the CPUID evaluation with it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Use topology logical mapping mechanismThomas Gleixner4-131/+12
Replace the logical package and die management functionality and retrieve the logical IDs from the topology bitmaps. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Provide logical pkg/die mappingThomas Gleixner2-0/+37
With the topology bitmaps in place the logical package and die IDs can trivially be retrieved by determining the bitmap weight of the relevant topology domain level up to and including the physical ID in question. Provide a function to that effect. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Simplify cpu_mark_primary_thread()Thomas Gleixner1-4/+1
No point in creating a mask via fls(). smp_num_siblings is guaranteed to be a power of 2. So just using (smp_num_siblings - 1) has the same effect. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Mop up primary thread mask handlingThomas Gleixner1-27/+2
The early initcall to initialize the primary thread mask is not longer required because topology_init_possible_cpus() can mark primary threads correctly when initializing the possible and present map as the number of SMT threads is already determined correctly. The XENPV workaround is not longer required because XENPV now registers fake APIC IDs which will just work like any other enumeration. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Use topology bitmaps for sizingThomas Gleixner8-60/+39
Now that all possible APIC IDs are tracked in the topology bitmaps, its trivial to retrieve the real information from there. This gets rid of the guesstimates for the maximal packages and dies per package as the actual numbers can be determined before a single AP has been brought up. The number of SMT threads can now be determined correctly from the bitmaps in all situations. Up to now a system which has SMT disabled in the BIOS will still claim that it is SMT capable, because the lowest APIC ID bit is reserved for that and CPUID leaf 0xb/0x1f still enumerates the SMT domain accordingly. By calculating the bitmap weights of the SMT and the CORE domain and setting them into relation the SMT disabled in BIOS situation reports correctly that the system is not SMT capable. It also handles the situation correctly when a hybrid systems boot CPU does not have SMT as it takes the SMT capability of the APs fully into account. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Let XEN/PV use topology from CPUID/MADTThomas Gleixner4-30/+24
It turns out that XEN/PV Dom0 has halfways usable CPUID/MADT enumeration except that it cannot deal with CPUs which are enumerated as disabled in MADT. DomU has no MADT and provides at least rudimentary topology information in CPUID leaves 1 and 4. For both it's important that there are not more possible Linux CPUs than vCPUs provided by the hypervisor. As this is ensured by counting the vCPUs before enumeration happens: - lift the restrictions in the CPUID evaluation and the MADT parser - Utilize MADT registration for Dom0 - Keep the fake APIC ID registration for DomU - Fix the XEN APIC fake so the readout of the local APIC ID works for Dom0 via the hypercall and for DomU by returning the registered fake APIC IDs. With that the XEN/PV fake approximates usefulness. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/xen/smp_pv: Count number of vCPUs earlyThomas Gleixner3-0/+19
XEN/PV has a completely broken vCPU enumeration scheme, which just works by chance and provides zero topology information. Each vCPU ends up being a single core package. Dom0 provides MADT which can be used for topology information, but that table is the unmodified host table, which means that there can be more CPUs registered than the number of vCPUs XEN provides for the dom0 guest. DomU does not have ACPI and both rely on counting the possible vCPUs via an hypercall. To prepare for using CPUID topology information either via MADT or via fake APIC IDs count the number of possible CPUs during early boot and adjust nr_cpu_ids() accordingly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Assign hotpluggable CPUIDs during initThomas Gleixner1-11/+18
There is no point in assigning the CPU numbers during ACPI physical hotplug. The number of possible hotplug CPUs is known when the possible map is initialized, so the CPU numbers can be associated to the registered non-present APIC IDs right there. This allows to put more code into the __init section and makes the related data __ro_after_init. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Reject unknown APIC IDs on ACPI hotplugThomas Gleixner1-0/+4
The topology bitmaps track all possible APIC IDs which have been registered during enumeration. As sizing and further topology information is going to be derived from these bitmaps, reject attempts to hotplug an APIC ID which was not registered during enumeration. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/topology: Add a mechanism to track topology via APIC IDsThomas Gleixner1-2/+46
Topology on X86 is determined by the registered APIC IDs and the segmentation information retrieved from CPUID. Depending on the granularity of the provided CPUID information the most fine grained scheme looks like this according to Intel terminology: [PKG][DIEGRP][DIE][TILE][MODULE][CORE][THREAD] Not enumerated domain levels consume 0 bits in the APIC ID. This allows to provide a consistent view at the topology and determine other information precisely like the number of cores in a package on hybrid systems, where the existing assumption that number or cores == number of threads / threads per core does not hold. Provide per domain level bitmaps which record the APIC ID split into the domain levels to make later evaluation of domain level specific information simple. This allows to calculate e.g. the logical IDs without any further extra logic. Contrary to the existing registration mechanism this records disabled CPUs, which are subject to later hotplug as well. That's useful for boot time sizing of package or die dependent allocations without using heuristics. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Detect real BSP on crash kernelsThomas Gleixner3-52/+61
When a kdump kernel is started from a crashing CPU then there is no guarantee that this CPU is the real boot CPU (BSP). If the kdump kernel tries to online the BSP then the INIT sequence will reset the machine. There is a command line option to prevent this, but in case of nested kdump kernels this is wrong. But that command line option is not required at all because the real BSP is enumerated as the first CPU by firmware. Support for the only known system which was different (Voyager) got removed long ago. Detect whether the boot CPU APIC ID is the first APIC ID enumerated by the firmware. If the first APIC ID enumerated is not matching the boot CPU APIC ID then skip registering it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Rework possible CPU managementThomas Gleixner6-89/+118
Managing possible CPUs is an unreadable and uncomprehensible maze. Aside of that it's backwards because it applies command line limits after registering all APICs. Rewrite it so that it: - Applies the command line limits upfront so that only the allowed amount of APIC IDs can be registered. - Applies eventual late restrictions in an understandable way - Uses simple min_t() calculations which are trivial to follow. - Provides a separate function for resetting to UP mode late in the bringup process. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Sanitize the APIC admission logicThomas Gleixner1-82/+77
Move the actually required content of generic_processor_id() into the call sites and use common helper functions for them. This separates the early boot registration and the ACPI hotplug mechanism completely which allows further cleanups and improvements. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/smpboot: Make error message actually usefulThomas Gleixner1-3/+7
"smpboot: native_kick_ap: bad cpu 33" is absolutely useless information. Replace it with something meaningful which allows to decode the failure condition. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Use a data structure for topology infoThomas Gleixner1-30/+29
Put the processor accounting into a data structure, which will gain more topology related information in the next steps, and sanitize the accounting. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Simplify APIC registrationThomas Gleixner1-20/+3
Having the same check whether the number of assigned CPUs has reached the nr_cpu_ids limit twice in the same code path is pointless. Repeating the information that CPUs are ignored over and over is also pointless noise. Remove the redundant check and reduce the noise by using a pr_warn_once(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Confine topology informationThomas Gleixner4-78/+74
Now that all external fiddling with num_processors and disabled_cpus is gone, move the last user prefill_possible_map() into the topology code too and remove the global visibility of these variables. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/xen/smp_pv: Register fake APICsThomas Gleixner1-27/+10
XENPV does not use the APIC. It's just piggy packing on the infrastructure and fiddles with global variables as it sees fit. These global variables are going away, so let XENPV register pseudo APIC IDs to keep the accounting correct and keep up the illusion that XEN/PV is something sane. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/acpi: Dont invoke topology_register_apic() for XEN PVThomas Gleixner1-2/+6
The MADT table for XEN/PV dom0 is not really useful and registering the APICs is momentarily a pointless exercise because XENPV does not use an APIC at all. It overrides the x86_init.mpparse.parse_smp_config() callback, resets num_processors and counts how many of them are provided by the hypervisor. This is in the way of cleaning up the APIC registration. Prevent MADT registration for XEN/PV temporarily until the rework is completed and XEN/PV can use the MADT again. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Use new APIC registration functionThomas Gleixner3-11/+10
Aside of switching over to the new interface, record the number of registered CPUs locally, which allows to make num_processors and disabled_cpus confined to the topology code. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/of: Use new APIC registration functionsThomas Gleixner1-1/+1
No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/jailhouse: Use new APIC registration functionThomas Gleixner1-1/+1
No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/acpi: Use new APIC registration functionsThomas Gleixner1-37/+7
Use the new topology registration functions and make the early boot code path __init. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Provide separate APIC registration functionsThomas Gleixner2-18/+98
generic_processor_info() aside of being a complete misnomer is used for both early boot registration and ACPI CPU hotplug. While it's arguable that this can share some code, it results in code which is hard to understand and kept around post init for no real reason. Also the call sites do lots of manual fiddling in topology related variables instead of having proper interfaces for the purpose which handle the topology internals correctly. Provide topology_register_apic(), topology_hotplug_apic() and topology_hotunplug_apic() which have the extra magic of the call sites incorporated and for now are wrappers around generic_processor_info(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Move registration out of APIC codeThomas Gleixner4-188/+195
The APIC/CPU registration sits in the middle of the APIC code. In fact this is a topology evaluation function and has nothing to do with the inner workings of the local APIC. Move it out into a file which reflects what this is about. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/apic: Use a proper define for invalid ACPI CPU IDThomas Gleixner3-2/+5
The ACPI ID for CPUs is preset with U32_MAX which is completely non obvious. Use a proper define for it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/apic: Remove yet another dubious callbackThomas Gleixner6-14/+0
Paranoia is not wrong, but having an APIC callback which is in most implementations a complete NOOP and in one actually looking whether the APICID of an upcoming CPU has been registered. The same APICID which was used to bring the CPU out of wait for startup. That's paranoia for the paranoia sake. Remove the voodoo. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/apic: Remove the pointless writeback of boot_cpu_physical_apicidThomas Gleixner10-45/+0
There is absolutely no point to write the APIC ID which was read from the local APIC earlier, back into the local APIC for the 64-bit UP case. Remove that along with the apic callback which is solely there for this pointless exercise. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Remove the physid_t bitmap wrapperThomas Gleixner6-58/+30
physid_t is a wrapper around bitmap. Just remove the onion layer and use bitmap functionality directly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/mm/numa: Move early mptable evaluation into common codeThomas Gleixner3-12/+2
There is no reason to have the early mptable evaluation conditionally invoked only from the AMD numa topology code. Make it explicit and invoke it from setup_arch() right after the corresponding ACPI init call. Remove the pointless wrapper and invoke x86_init::mpparse::early_parse_smp_config() directly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Switch to new init callbacksThomas Gleixner10-39/+9
Now that all platforms have the new split SMP configuration callbacks set up, flip the switch and remove the old callback pointer and mop up the platform code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/hyperv/vtl: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacksThomas Gleixner1-1/+3
Initialize the new callbacks in preparation for switching the core code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/xen/smp_pv: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacksThomas Gleixner1-2/+9
Provide a wrapper around the existing function and fill the new callbacks in. No functional change as the new callbacks are not yet operational. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/jailhouse: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacksThomas Gleixner1-12/+20
Provide a wrapper around the existing function and fill the new callbacks in. No functional change as the new callbacks are not yet operational. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/platform/intel-mid: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacksThomas Gleixner1-2/+4
Initialize the split SMP configuration callbacks with NOOPs as MID is strictly ACPI only. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/platform/ce4100: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacksThomas Gleixner1-6/+8
Select x86_dtb_parse_smp_config() as SMP configuration parser in preparation of splitting up the get_smp_config() callback. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/dtb: Rename x86_dtb_init()Thomas Gleixner3-4/+4
x86_dtb_init() is a misnomer and it really should be used as a SMP configuration parser which is selected by the platform via x86_init::mpparse:parse_smp_config(). Rename it to x86_dtb_parse_smp_config() in preparation for that. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Prepare for callback separationThomas Gleixner3-6/+20
In preparation of splitting the get_smp_config() callback, rename default_get_smp_config() to mpparse_get_smp_config() and provide an early and late wrapper. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Provide separate early/late callbacksThomas Gleixner1-0/+4
The early argument of x86_init::mpparse::get_smp_config() is more than confusing. Provide two callbacks, one for each purpose. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Rename default_find_smp_config()Thomas Gleixner8-20/+13
MPTABLE is no longer the default SMP configuration mechanism. Rename it to mpparse_find_mptable() because that's what it does. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/apic: Remove check_apicid_used() and ioapic_phys_id_map()Thomas Gleixner6-28/+0
No more users. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/ioapic: Simplify setup_ioapic_ids_from_mpc_nocheck()Thomas Gleixner1-3/+2
No need to go through APIC callbacks. It's already established that this is an ancient APIC. So just copy the present mask and use the direct physid* functions all over the place. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/ioapic: Make io_apic_get_unique_id() simplerThomas Gleixner1-17/+5
No need to go through APIC callbacks. It's already established that this is an ancient APIC. So just copy the present mask and use the direct physid* functions all over the place. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/apic: Get rid of get_physical_broadcast()Thomas Gleixner2-37/+22
There is no point for this function. The only case where this is used is when there is no XAPIC available, which means the broadcast address is 0xF. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/ioapic: Replace some more set bit nonsenseThomas Gleixner2-7/+2
Yet another set_bit() operation wrapped in oring a mask. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/platform/ce4100: Dont override x86_init.mpparse.setup_ioapic_idsThomas Gleixner3-3/+1
There is no point to do that. The ATOMs have an XAPIC for which this function is a pointless exercise. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Make the APIC mismatch warnings completeThomas Gleixner3-16/+16
Detect all possible combinations of mismatch right in the CPUID evaluation code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/apic/uv: Remove the private leaf 0xb parserThomas Gleixner2-43/+14
The package shift has been already evaluated by the early CPU init. Put the mindless copy right next to the original leaf 0xb parser. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <[email protected]> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <[email protected]> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2024-02-15x86/xen/smp_pv: Remove cpudata fiddlingThomas Gleixner1-3/+0
The new topology CPUID parser installs already fake topology for XEN/PV, which ends up with cpuinfo::max_cores = 1. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <[email protected]> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <[email protected]> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Powered by cgit, Gruvboxed by Blaster4385.