Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Dave Jiang <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for unconditionally passing the
struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
'desc' variable is now defined but not used in sf_pdma_donebh_tasklet(),
causing this warning:
drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c: In function 'sf_pdma_donebh_tasklet':
drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c:287:23: warning: unused variable 'desc' [-Wunused-variable]
Remove this unused variable
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
rcar-dmac driver is used on Renesas R-Car Gen{2,3} and Renesas
RZ/G{1,2} SoC's, update the same to reflect the description
for RCAR_DMAC config.
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chris Paterson <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Use separate data for SoC dependent parameters. These parameters depends
on the DMA integration (either in HW or in SYSFW), the DMA controller
itself remains compatible with either the am654 or j721e variant.
j7200 have the same DMA as j721e with different number of channels, which
can be queried from HW, but SYSFW defines different rchan_oes_offset
number for j7200 (0x80) compared to j721e (0x400).
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Linux 5.9-rc4
|
|
When we got an error from DMA mapping API we convert a negative value
to unsigned long type and hence make user confused:
result #1: 'src mapping error' with src_off=0x19a72 dst_off=0xea len=0xccf4 (18446744073709551604)
Change this to print error codes as signed values.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit f458488425f1 ("amba: Initialize dma_parms for amba
devices"), struct amba_device already provides a dma_parms structure,
so we can save allocating another one.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c9e58882e33f22f9b0a6d65a5507e24004512148.1599164692.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit 9495b7e92f71 ("driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms
for platform devices"), struct platform_device already provides a
dma_parms structure, so we can save allocating another one.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/60ac2ef17e242dbf631db29ebde9d64d6df67030.1599164692.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit 9495b7e92f71 ("driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms
for platform devices"), struct platform_device already provides a
dma_parms structure, so we can save allocating another one.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/011a956183b92a258bf0922385d145ea966dcbea.1599164692.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit 9495b7e92f71 ("driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms
for platform devices"), struct platform_device already provides a
dma_parms structure, so we can save allocating another one.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/23d40e15af10aad4724a2770ec18b4b28c1b8a71.1599164692.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit 9495b7e92f71 ("driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms
for platform devices"), struct platform_device already provides a
dma_parms structure, so we can save allocating another one.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/dc0fb6963067b9c799873d761661ed6dce1426ec.1599164692.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit 9495b7e92f71 ("driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms
for platform devices"), struct platform_device already provides a
dma_parms structure, so we can save allocating another one.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d9b551dcf712a91860af3c5dd01a31b9b97ac1c5.1599164692.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit 9495b7e92f71 ("driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms
for platform devices"), struct platform_device already provides a
dma_parms structure, so we can save allocating another one.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7fad3c60cac2bf4f8dab791f8b6eafae90abc960.1599164692.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit 9495b7e92f71 ("driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms
for platform devices"), struct platform_device already provides a
dma_parms structure, so we can save allocating another one.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/116927330a4a66aac579ad38ddbc3b538cd9524c.1599164692.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit 9495b7e92f71 ("driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms
for platform devices"), struct platform_device already provides a
dma_parms structure, so we can save allocating another one.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9b759e4c9eb37c90a3616d31abe13af6a6dafcd2.1599164692.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
Because a callback is called twice when DMA transfer complete
the second callback may be possible to access a freed memory
if the first callback routines perform the dma_release_channel function.
So this patch serialized the callback functions
Signed-off-by: Brad Kim <[email protected]>
Tested-and-reviewed-by: Green Wan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Brad Kim <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
Pull more io_uring fixes from Jens Axboe:
"Two followup fixes. One is fixing a regression from this merge window,
the other is two commits fixing cancelation of deferred requests.
Both have gone through full testing, and both spawned a few new
regression test additions to liburing.
- Don't play games with const, properly store the output iovec and
assign it as needed.
- Deferred request cancelation fix (Pavel)"
* tag 'io_uring-5.9-2020-09-06' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
io_uring: fix linked deferred ->files cancellation
io_uring: fix cancel of deferred reqs with ->files
io_uring: fix explicit async read/write mapping for large segments
|