| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The tlv320aic32x4 PLL clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <[email protected]>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Tegra super clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <[email protected]>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <[email protected]>
Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Tegra periph clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <[email protected]>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <[email protected]>
Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The STM32 composite clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <[email protected]>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The ST Flexgen clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Spreadtrum composite clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: Orson Zhai <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Ingenic TCU clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Paul Cercueil <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Ingenic CGU clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Paul Cercueil <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The iMX SCU clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't
provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. The round_rate()
implementation being shared with other clocks, it's not removed.
And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later
on.
Cc: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Cc: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: NXP Linux Team <[email protected]>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The TI DA8xx USB0 clk48 clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: David Lechner <[email protected]>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Lechner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The SI5351 clkout clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The SI5351 msynth clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The SI5351 PLL clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The SI5341 output clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The cdce706 clkout clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The cdce706 divider clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The AXI clkgen clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Atmel SAM9x5 SMD clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Actions composite factor clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <[email protected]>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Actions composite divider clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <[email protected]>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The tlv320aic32x4 clkin clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <[email protected]>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Allwinner sun6i RTC clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>
Cc: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The TI J721e Wiz clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
Cc: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The TI AM654 SerDes clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
Cc: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Cadence Torrent refclk clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
Cc: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Cadence Sierra PLL clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
Cc: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Tegra sor pad clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Cc: David Airlie <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Mikko Perttunen <[email protected]>
Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Versatile sp810 "timerclken" clock implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
This mismatch is probably due to the fact that the driver introduction
predates the determine_rate introduction, and it was never revised since
then.
The default, implicit, behaviour that has been in use so far has thus
been to simply keep using the current parent in all cases. This is also
the behaviour of the new clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() helper, so
we can simply use it to make our expectation explicit.
Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Cc: Pawel Moll <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pawel Moll <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The UX500 sysctrl "set_parent" clocks implement a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The UX500 PRCMU "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The PRCMU binding also allows to specify the default clock parent
through a device tree cell. This will be enforced at prepare time by the
driver.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
The result is that the driver relies on prepare to set the default
parent, and thus the set_parent hook is effectively unused by design.
We can make that decision explicit by setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() that will keep the
same behaviour. Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided,
clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself
on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the
clock rate otherwise.
Cc: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Tegra periph nodiv clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <[email protected]>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <[email protected]>
Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Tegra super mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <[email protected]>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <[email protected]>
Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Tegra BPMP mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <[email protected]>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <[email protected]>
Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The STM32 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <[email protected]>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The SoCFGPA gate clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Renesas r9a06g032 bitselect clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The PXA "CKEN" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Mediatek cpumux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The iMX SCU mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Cc: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: NXP Linux Team <[email protected]>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The iMX fixup mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Cc: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: NXP Linux Team <[email protected]>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The iMX busy clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Cc: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: NXP Linux Team <[email protected]>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Davinci DA8xxx cfgchip "clk48" clock implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: David Lechner <[email protected]>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Lechner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Davinci DA8xxx cfgchip mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: David Lechner <[email protected]>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Lechner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The WM381x "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: [email protected]
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Versaclock5 "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Versaclock5 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The STM32F4 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <[email protected]>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The SI5341 clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The Qoriq mux clocks implement a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|
|
The lochnagar clocks implement a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Since there's no upstream device tree using that driver, it's a bit hard
to tell if it uses the assigned-clock properties. The binding and its
example uses them though, so it's likely that the author intent was to
force the parent through the device tree and prevent any reparenting but
through an explicit call to clk_set_parent().
This case is equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to
clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Tested-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>:
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
|