diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 329 |
1 files changed, 325 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 543847957fdd..fb82d29ee863 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include <linux/filter.h> #include <linux/bpf_perf_event.h> #include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <linux/if_ether.h> #include <bpf/bpf.h> @@ -49,6 +50,8 @@ #define MAX_INSNS 512 #define MAX_FIXUPS 8 #define MAX_NR_MAPS 4 +#define POINTER_VALUE 0xcafe4all +#define TEST_DATA_LEN 64 #define F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS (1 << 0) #define F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT (1 << 1) @@ -62,6 +65,7 @@ struct bpf_test { int fixup_map_in_map[MAX_FIXUPS]; const char *errstr; const char *errstr_unpriv; + uint32_t retval; enum { UNDEF, ACCEPT, @@ -95,6 +99,94 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = -3, + }, + { + "DIV32 by 0, zero check 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV32 by 0, zero check 2", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV64 by 0, zero check", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "MOD32 by 0, zero check 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "MOD32 by 0, zero check 2", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "MOD64 by 0, zero check", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "empty prog", + .insns = { + }, + .errstr = "last insn is not an exit or jmp", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "only exit insn", + .insns = { + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R0 !read_ok", + .result = REJECT, }, { "unreachable", @@ -210,6 +302,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, }, { "test8 ld_imm64", @@ -274,6 +367,46 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, }, { + "arsh32 on imm", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 5), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU", + }, + { + "arsh32 on reg", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 5), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU", + }, + { + "arsh64 on imm", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 5), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + }, + { + "arsh64 on reg", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 5), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + }, + { "no bpf_exit", .insns = { BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), @@ -477,6 +610,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .retval = POINTER_VALUE, }, { "check valid spill/fill, skb mark", @@ -763,6 +897,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer comparison", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = -ENOENT, }, { "jump test 4", @@ -1783,6 +1918,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0xfaceb00c, }, { "PTR_TO_STACK store/load - bad alignment on off", @@ -1841,6 +1977,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", + .retval = POINTER_VALUE, }, { "unpriv: add const to pointer", @@ -2014,6 +2151,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, 0), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_hash_recalc), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, @@ -2554,6 +2692,29 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { + "context stores via ST", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark), 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "BPF_ST stores into R1 context is not allowed", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, + { + "context stores via XADD", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, + BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark), 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R1 context is not allowed", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, + { "direct packet access: test1", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, @@ -2778,6 +2939,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .retval = 1, }, { "direct packet access: test12 (and, good access)", @@ -2802,6 +2964,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .retval = 1, }, { "direct packet access: test13 (branches, good access)", @@ -2832,6 +2995,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .retval = 1, }, { "direct packet access: test14 (pkt_ptr += 0, CONST_IMM, good access)", @@ -2855,6 +3019,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .retval = 1, }, { "direct packet access: test15 (spill with xadd)", @@ -3141,6 +3306,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .retval = 1, }, { "direct packet access: test28 (marking on <=, bad access)", @@ -4273,7 +4439,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .fixup_map1 = { 2 }, .errstr_unpriv = "R2 leaks addr into mem", .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .result = ACCEPT, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R1 context is not allowed", }, { "leak pointer into ctx 2", @@ -4287,7 +4454,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .errstr_unpriv = "R10 leaks addr into mem", .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .result = ACCEPT, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R1 context is not allowed", }, { "leak pointer into ctx 3", @@ -5758,6 +5926,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .retval = 0 /* csum_diff of 64-byte packet */, }, { "helper access to variable memory: size = 0 not allowed on NULL (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)", @@ -6126,6 +6295,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 42 /* ultimate return value */, }, { "ld_ind: check calling conv, r1", @@ -6197,6 +6367,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, }, { "check bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period byte load permitted", @@ -6668,7 +6839,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, -7), }, .fixup_map1 = { 4 }, - .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7184,6 +7355,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = POINTER_VALUE, .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr as return value" }, @@ -7204,6 +7376,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = POINTER_VALUE, .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr as return value" }, @@ -7645,6 +7818,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = TEST_DATA_LEN, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { @@ -8570,6 +8744,127 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { + "check deducing bounds from const, 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 1, 0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", + }, + { + "check deducing bounds from const, 2", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLE, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + }, + { + "check deducing bounds from const, 3", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", + }, + { + "check deducing bounds from const, 4", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + }, + { + "check deducing bounds from const, 5", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", + }, + { + "check deducing bounds from const, 6", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", + }, + { + "check deducing bounds from const, 7", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, ~0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr", + }, + { + "check deducing bounds from const, 8", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, ~0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr", + }, + { + "check deducing bounds from const, 9", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", + }, + { + "check deducing bounds from const, 10", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + /* Marks reg as unknown. */ + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "math between ctx pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed", + }, + { "bpf_exit with invalid return code. test1", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0), @@ -8665,6 +8960,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, }, { "calls: overlapping caller/callee", @@ -8860,6 +9156,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = TEST_DATA_LEN, }, { "calls: callee using args1", @@ -8872,6 +9169,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr_unpriv = "allowed for root only", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = POINTER_VALUE, }, { "calls: callee using wrong args2", @@ -8902,6 +9200,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr_unpriv = "allowed for root only", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = TEST_DATA_LEN + TEST_DATA_LEN - ETH_HLEN - ETH_HLEN, }, { "calls: callee changing pkt pointers", @@ -8950,6 +9249,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = TEST_DATA_LEN + TEST_DATA_LEN, }, { "calls: calls with stack arith", @@ -8968,6 +9268,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 42, }, { "calls: calls with misaligned stack access", @@ -9001,6 +9302,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 43, }, { "calls: calls control flow, jump test 2", @@ -9493,6 +9795,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 42, }, { "calls: write into callee stack frame", @@ -10104,6 +10407,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .retval = POINTER_VALUE, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 2", @@ -10169,6 +10473,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 4", @@ -10202,6 +10507,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 5", @@ -10610,10 +10916,12 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, int fd_prog, expected_ret, reject_from_alignment; struct bpf_insn *prog = test->insns; int prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog); + char data_in[TEST_DATA_LEN] = {}; int prog_type = test->prog_type; int map_fds[MAX_NR_MAPS]; const char *expected_err; - int i; + uint32_t retval; + int i, err; for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++) map_fds[i] = -1; @@ -10656,6 +10964,19 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, } } + if (fd_prog >= 0) { + err = bpf_prog_test_run(fd_prog, 1, data_in, sizeof(data_in), + NULL, NULL, &retval, NULL); + if (err && errno != 524/*ENOTSUPP*/ && errno != EPERM) { + printf("Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error\n"); + goto fail_log; + } + if (!err && retval != test->retval && + test->retval != POINTER_VALUE) { + printf("FAIL retval %d != %d\n", retval, test->retval); + goto fail_log; + } + } (*passes)++; printf("OK%s\n", reject_from_alignment ? " (NOTE: reject due to unknown alignment)" : ""); |