aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c1738
1 files changed, 1674 insertions, 64 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index f8eac4a544f4..10d44446e801 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <limits.h>
+#include <assert.h>
#include <sys/capability.h>
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@
#define MAX_INSNS BPF_MAXINSNS
#define MAX_FIXUPS 8
#define MAX_NR_MAPS 13
+#define MAX_TEST_RUNS 8
#define POINTER_VALUE 0xcafe4all
#define TEST_DATA_LEN 64
@@ -76,7 +78,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
int fixup_percpu_cgroup_storage[MAX_FIXUPS];
const char *errstr;
const char *errstr_unpriv;
- uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv;
+ uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv, insn_processed;
enum {
UNDEF,
ACCEPT,
@@ -86,6 +88,14 @@ struct bpf_test {
uint8_t flags;
__u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN];
void (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self);
+ uint8_t runs;
+ struct {
+ uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv;
+ union {
+ __u8 data[TEST_DATA_LEN];
+ __u64 data64[TEST_DATA_LEN / 8];
+ };
+ } retvals[MAX_TEST_RUNS];
};
/* Note we want this to be 64 bit aligned so that the end of our array is
@@ -721,8 +731,18 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 5),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "unknown opcode c4",
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "arsh32 on imm 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x1122334485667788),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 7),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = -16069393,
},
{
"arsh32 on reg",
@@ -732,8 +752,19 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "unknown opcode cc",
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "arsh32 on reg 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0xffff55667788),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 15),
+ BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 43724,
},
{
"arsh64 on imm",
@@ -980,15 +1011,45 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8),
/* mess up with R1 pointer on stack */
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_10, -7, 0x23),
- /* fill back into R0 should fail */
+ /* fill back into R0 is fine for priv.
+ * R0 now becomes SCALAR_VALUE.
+ */
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10, -8),
+ /* Load from R0 should fail. */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 8),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "attempt to corrupt spilled",
- .errstr = "corrupted spill",
+ .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
+ "check corrupted spill/fill, LSB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0xcafe),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10, -8),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr_unpriv = "attempt to corrupt spilled",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = POINTER_VALUE,
+ },
+ {
+ "check corrupted spill/fill, MSB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0x12345678),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10, -8),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr_unpriv = "attempt to corrupt spilled",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = POINTER_VALUE,
+ },
+ {
"invalid src register in STX",
.insns = {
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_10, -1, -1),
@@ -1792,10 +1853,20 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
},
{
- "invalid 64B read of family in SK_MSG",
+ "valid access size in SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ },
+ {
+ "invalid 64B read of size in SK_MSG",
.insns = {
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family)),
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
@@ -1806,10 +1877,10 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
"invalid read past end of SK_MSG",
.insns = {
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port) + 4),
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size) + 4),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "R0 !read_ok",
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
},
@@ -1823,6 +1894,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet read for SK_MSG",
@@ -2026,29 +2098,27 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
- "check skb->hash byte load not permitted 1",
+ "check skb->hash byte load permitted 1",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
},
{
- "check skb->hash byte load not permitted 2",
+ "check skb->hash byte load permitted 2",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 2),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
},
{
- "check skb->hash byte load not permitted 3",
+ "check skb->hash byte load permitted 3",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
@@ -2060,8 +2130,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
#endif
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"check cb access: byte, wrong type",
@@ -2173,7 +2242,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
- "check skb->hash half load not permitted",
+ "check skb->hash half load permitted 2",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
@@ -2185,10 +2254,43 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
#endif
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "check skb->hash half load not permitted, unaligned 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 1),
+#else
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 3),
+#endif
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
+ "check skb->hash half load not permitted, unaligned 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 3),
+#else
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 1),
+#endif
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
+ },
+ {
"check cb access: half, wrong type",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -2418,6 +2520,10 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index)),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[3])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp)),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "",
@@ -2472,6 +2578,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid stack off=-79992 size=8",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
},
{
"PTR_TO_STACK store/load - out of bounds high",
@@ -2904,6 +3011,19 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
+ "alu32: mov u32 const",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_7, 0),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_7, 1),
+ BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
"unpriv: partial copy of pointer",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
@@ -2986,6 +3106,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
@@ -3088,6 +3210,243 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.retval_unpriv = 2,
},
{
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check high 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 42,
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check high 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, -1, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 42,
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check high 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, -1, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 42,
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check high 4",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .errstr = "invalid stack off=0 size=1",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check high 5",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, (1 << 29) - 1),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid stack off",
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check high 6",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, (1 << 29) - 1),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, SHRT_MAX, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, SHRT_MAX),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid stack off",
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check high 7",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, (1 << 29) - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, (1 << 29) - 1),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, SHRT_MAX, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, SHRT_MAX),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .errstr = "fp pointer offset",
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check low 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -512),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 42,
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check low 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -513),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 1, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 42,
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check low 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -513),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .errstr = "invalid stack off=-513 size=1",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check low 4",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, INT_MIN),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "math between fp pointer",
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check low 5",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -((1 << 29) - 1)),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid stack off",
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check low 6",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -((1 << 29) - 1)),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, SHRT_MIN, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, SHRT_MIN),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid stack off",
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK check low 7",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -((1 << 29) - 1)),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -((1 << 29) - 1)),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, SHRT_MIN, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, SHRT_MIN),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .errstr = "fp pointer offset",
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK mixed reg/k, 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -3),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -3),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 42,
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK mixed reg/k, 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -3),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -3),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_5, -6),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 42,
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK mixed reg/k, 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -3),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -3),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = -3,
+ },
+ {
+ "PTR_TO_STACK reg",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -3),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, 0, 42),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "invalid stack off=0 size=1",
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 42,
+ },
+ {
"stack pointer arithmetic",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 4),
@@ -3249,6 +3608,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"raw_stack: skb_load_bytes, spilled regs corruption 2",
@@ -3279,6 +3639,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "R3 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"raw_stack: skb_load_bytes, spilled regs + data",
@@ -3778,6 +4139,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test16 (arith on data_end)",
@@ -3880,6 +4242,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test21 (x += pkt_ptr, 2)",
@@ -3905,6 +4268,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test22 (x += pkt_ptr, 3)",
@@ -3935,6 +4299,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test23 (x += pkt_ptr, 4)",
@@ -3961,6 +4326,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid access to packet, off=0 size=8, R5(id=1,off=0,r=0)",
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test24 (x += pkt_ptr, 5)",
@@ -3986,6 +4352,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test25 (marking on <, good access)",
@@ -5117,6 +5484,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=64 off=-2 size=4",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid cgroup storage access 5",
@@ -5233,6 +5601,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=64 off=-2 size=4",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid per-cpu cgroup storage access 5",
@@ -5270,6 +5639,31 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
},
{
+ "write tstamp from CGROUP_SKB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp)),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "invalid bpf_context access off=152 size=8",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ },
+ {
+ "read tstamp from CGROUP_SKB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp)),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ },
+ {
"multiple registers share map_lookup_elem result",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 10),
@@ -6457,6 +6851,232 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
{
+ "map access: known scalar += value_ptr from different maps",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, len)),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 1, 3),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 1, 2),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 5 },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 8 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps",
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr -= known scalar from different maps",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, len)),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 1, 3),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 1, 2),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 5 },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 8 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 min value is outside of the array range",
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: known scalar += value_ptr from different maps, but same value properties",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, len)),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 1, 3),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 1, 2),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 5 },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 8 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, upper oob arith, test 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 48),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, upper oob arith, test 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 49),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, upper oob arith, test 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 47),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr -= known scalar, lower oob arith, test 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 5),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 47),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 48),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "R0 min value is outside of the array range",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr -= known scalar, lower oob arith, test 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 47),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 48),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr -= known scalar, lower oob arith, test 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 5),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 47),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 47),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
"map access: known scalar += value_ptr",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
@@ -6477,7 +7097,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.retval = 1,
},
{
- "map access: value_ptr += known scalar",
+ "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, 1",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
@@ -6497,7 +7117,113 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.retval = 1,
},
{
- "map access: unknown scalar += value_ptr",
+ "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 49),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid access to map value",
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid access to map value",
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, 4",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 5),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -2),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, 5",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, (6 + 1) * sizeof(int)),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0xabcdef12,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, 6",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 5),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, (3 + 1) * sizeof(int)),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 3 * sizeof(int)),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0xabcdef12,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: unknown scalar += value_ptr, 1",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
@@ -6518,7 +7244,76 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.retval = 1,
},
{
- "map access: value_ptr += unknown scalar",
+ "map access: unknown scalar += value_ptr, 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 31),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0xabcdef12,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: unknown scalar += value_ptr, 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 31),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+ .retval = 0xabcdef12,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: unknown scalar += value_ptr, 4",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 19),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 31),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "R1 max value is outside of the array range",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr += unknown scalar, 1",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
@@ -6539,6 +7334,54 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.retval = 1,
},
{
+ "map access: value_ptr += unknown scalar, 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 31),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0xabcdef12,
+ },
+ {
+ "map access: value_ptr += unknown scalar, 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 11),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 16),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 0xf),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 4),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, -3),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
"map access: value_ptr += value_ptr",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
@@ -6617,6 +7460,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
.retval = 1,
},
{
@@ -6684,6 +7529,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
.retval = 1,
},
{
@@ -7149,6 +7996,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result = REJECT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"map element value illegal alu op, 5",
@@ -7171,6 +8019,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"map element value is preserved across register spilling",
@@ -7664,6 +8513,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.retval = 0 /* csum_diff of 64-byte packet */,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 not allowed on NULL (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
@@ -8220,6 +9070,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8244,6 +9095,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8270,6 +9122,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8295,6 +9148,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8343,6 +9197,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8414,6 +9269,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8465,6 +9321,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8492,6 +9349,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8518,6 +9376,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8547,6 +9406,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R7 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8577,6 +9437,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 4 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8605,6 +9466,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
},
@@ -8657,9 +9519,39 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
+ "check subtraction on pointers for unpriv",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_ARG1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -8),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_ARG2, 0, 9),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_ARG1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -8),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_ARG2, 0, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1, 9 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R9 pointer -= pointer prohibited",
+ },
+ {
"bounds check based on zero-extended MOV",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
@@ -8990,6 +9882,36 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT
},
{
+ "bounds check after 32-bit right shift with 64-bit input",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6),
+ /* r1 = 2 */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2),
+ /* r1 = 1<<32 */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 31),
+ /* r1 = 0 (NOT 2!) */
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, 31),
+ /* r1 = 0xffff'fffe (NOT 0!) */
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 2),
+ /* computes OOB pointer */
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ /* OOB access */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ /* exit */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
+ .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
"bounds check map access with off+size signed 32bit overflow. test1",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
@@ -9029,6 +9951,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "pointer offset 1073741822",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
.result = REJECT
},
{
@@ -9050,6 +9973,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
.errstr = "pointer offset -1073741822",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
.result = REJECT
},
{
@@ -9221,6 +10145,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_EXIT_INSN()
},
.errstr = "fp pointer offset 1073741822",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
.result = REJECT
},
{
@@ -9626,6 +10551,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, bad access 1",
@@ -9663,6 +10589,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', good access",
@@ -9701,6 +10628,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', bad access 2",
@@ -9719,6 +10647,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, good access",
@@ -9757,6 +10686,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, bad access 2",
@@ -9775,6 +10705,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', good access",
@@ -9792,6 +10723,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', bad access 1",
@@ -9829,6 +10761,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, good access",
@@ -9865,6 +10798,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, bad access 2",
@@ -9902,6 +10836,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', bad access 1",
@@ -9940,6 +10875,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, good access",
@@ -9958,6 +10894,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, bad access 1",
@@ -9996,6 +10933,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', good access",
@@ -10032,6 +10970,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', bad access 2",
@@ -10068,6 +11007,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' > pkt_data, bad access 1",
@@ -10105,6 +11045,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data > pkt_meta', good access",
@@ -10143,6 +11084,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data > pkt_meta', bad access 2",
@@ -10161,6 +11103,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' < pkt_data, good access",
@@ -10199,6 +11142,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' < pkt_data, bad access 2",
@@ -10217,6 +11161,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data < pkt_meta', good access",
@@ -10234,6 +11179,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data < pkt_meta', bad access 1",
@@ -10271,6 +11217,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' >= pkt_data, good access",
@@ -10307,6 +11254,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' >= pkt_data, bad access 2",
@@ -10344,6 +11292,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data >= pkt_meta', bad access 1",
@@ -10382,6 +11331,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, good access",
@@ -10400,6 +11350,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1",
@@ -10438,6 +11389,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', good access",
@@ -10474,6 +11426,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2",
@@ -10578,6 +11531,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 8",
@@ -10591,6 +11545,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 9",
@@ -11065,6 +12020,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "R6 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: two calls with args",
@@ -11930,6 +12886,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 12, 22 },
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=2 size=8",
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: two calls that receive map_value via arg=ptr_stack_of_caller. test2",
@@ -12073,6 +13030,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 12, 22 },
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=2 size=8",
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: two calls that receive map_value_ptr_or_null via arg. test1",
@@ -12244,6 +13202,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.retval = POINTER_VALUE,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 2",
@@ -12275,6 +13234,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "invalid access to packet",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 3",
@@ -12310,6 +13270,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 1,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 4",
@@ -12344,6 +13305,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 1,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 5",
@@ -12377,6 +13339,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "same insn cannot be used with different",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 6",
@@ -12412,6 +13375,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "R4 invalid mem access",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 7",
@@ -12446,6 +13410,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "R4 invalid mem access",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 8",
@@ -12486,6 +13451,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 9",
@@ -12527,6 +13493,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "invalid access to packet",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: caller stack init to zero or map_value_or_null",
@@ -12892,6 +13859,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R2 pkt is not allowed",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"xadd/w check whether src/dst got mangled, 1",
@@ -13378,6 +14346,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "Unreleased reference",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"reference tracking: alloc, check, free in both subbranches",
@@ -13406,6 +14375,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"reference tracking in call: free reference in subprog",
@@ -13496,6 +14466,350 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
+ "allocated_stack",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 5),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10, -8),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_7, -9),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10, -9),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
+ .insn_processed = 15,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 5),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 5 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0xffffffff - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 4",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 5",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 6",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0xffffffff - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 7",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 5),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 5 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 8",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 9",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0xffffffff - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 10",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 11",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test out of bounds 12",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0xffffffff - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test in bounds 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 5 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 4,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test in bounds 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0xffffffff - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test in bounds 3",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0xfffffffe),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0xffffffff - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0xfffffffe,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test in bounds 4",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0xabcde),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0xabcdef - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0xabcde,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test in bounds 5",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test in bounds 6",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 46),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 47 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 46,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test in bounds 7",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, -46),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_3, -1),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 47 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 46,
+ },
+ {
+ "masking, test in bounds 8",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, -47),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_3, -1),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 47 - 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_2, 63),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
"reference tracking in call: free reference in subprog and outside",
.insns = {
BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
@@ -13916,6 +15230,38 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
+ "check wire_len is not readable by sockets",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, wire_len)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "check wire_len is readable by tc classifier",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, wire_len)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "check wire_len is not writable by tc classifier",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, wire_len)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 leaks addr",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
"calls: cross frame pruning",
.insns = {
/* r8 = !!random();
@@ -13939,10 +15285,200 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
.errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only",
+ .errstr = "!read_ok",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: functional",
+ .insns = {
+ /* r0 = 0 */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ /* prep for direct packet access via r2 */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_4, 8),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+
+ /* reg, bit 63 or bit 0 set, taken */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_8, 0x8000000000000001),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ /* reg, bit 62, not taken */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_8, 0x4000000000000000),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ /* imm, any bit set, taken */
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_7, -1, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ /* imm, bit 31 set, taken */
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_7, 0x80000000, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ /* all good - return r0 == 2 */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .runs = 7,
+ .retvals = {
+ { .retval = 2,
+ .data64 = { (1ULL << 63) | (1U << 31) | (1U << 0), }
+ },
+ { .retval = 2,
+ .data64 = { (1ULL << 63) | (1U << 31), }
+ },
+ { .retval = 2,
+ .data64 = { (1ULL << 31) | (1U << 0), }
+ },
+ { .retval = 2,
+ .data64 = { (__u32)-1, }
+ },
+ { .retval = 2,
+ .data64 = { ~0x4000000000000000ULL, }
+ },
+ { .retval = 0,
+ .data64 = { 0, }
+ },
+ { .retval = 0,
+ .data64 = { ~0ULL, }
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: sign-extend",
+ .insns = {
+ /* r0 = 0 */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ /* prep for direct packet access via r2 */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_4, 8),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_7, 0x80000000, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 2,
+ .data = { 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, },
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: known const compare",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .retval_unpriv = 1,
+ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 1,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: known const compare bad",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "!read_ok",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: unknown const compare taken",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "!read_ok",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: unknown const compare not taken",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr = "!read_ok",
.result = REJECT,
},
+ {
+ "jset: half-known const compare",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_0, 2),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 3, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: range",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 0xff),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_1, 0xf0, 3),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, 0x10, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_1, 0x10, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, 0x10, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
};
static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
@@ -13968,6 +15504,16 @@ static int create_map(uint32_t type, uint32_t size_key,
return fd;
}
+static void update_map(int fd, int index)
+{
+ struct test_val value = {
+ .index = (6 + 1) * sizeof(int),
+ .foo[6] = 0xabcdef12,
+ };
+
+ assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &index, &value, 0));
+}
+
static int create_prog_dummy1(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
{
struct bpf_insn prog[] = {
@@ -14119,6 +15665,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
if (*fixup_map_array_48b) {
map_fds[3] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, sizeof(int),
sizeof(struct test_val), 1);
+ update_map(map_fds[3], 0);
do {
prog[*fixup_map_array_48b].imm = map_fds[3];
fixup_map_array_48b++;
@@ -14225,16 +15772,43 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+static int do_prog_test_run(int fd_prog, bool unpriv, uint32_t expected_val,
+ void *data, size_t size_data)
+{
+ __u8 tmp[TEST_DATA_LEN << 2];
+ __u32 size_tmp = sizeof(tmp);
+ uint32_t retval;
+ int err;
+
+ if (unpriv)
+ set_admin(true);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(fd_prog, 1, data, size_data,
+ tmp, &size_tmp, &retval, NULL);
+ if (unpriv)
+ set_admin(false);
+ if (err && errno != 524/*ENOTSUPP*/ && errno != EPERM) {
+ printf("Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error ");
+ return err;
+ }
+ if (!err && retval != expected_val &&
+ expected_val != POINTER_VALUE) {
+ printf("FAIL retval %d != %d ", retval, expected_val);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
int *passes, int *errors)
{
- int fd_prog, expected_ret, reject_from_alignment;
+ int fd_prog, expected_ret, alignment_prevented_execution;
int prog_len, prog_type = test->prog_type;
struct bpf_insn *prog = test->insns;
+ int run_errs, run_successes;
int map_fds[MAX_NR_MAPS];
const char *expected_err;
- uint32_t expected_val;
- uint32_t retval;
+ __u32 pflags;
int i, err;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++)
@@ -14245,69 +15819,105 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
do_test_fixup(test, prog_type, prog, map_fds);
prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog);
- fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len,
- test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
+ pflags = 0;
+ if (test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT)
+ pflags |= BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT;
+ if (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
+ pflags |= BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT;
+ fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len, pflags,
"GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 1);
expected_ret = unpriv && test->result_unpriv != UNDEF ?
test->result_unpriv : test->result;
expected_err = unpriv && test->errstr_unpriv ?
test->errstr_unpriv : test->errstr;
- expected_val = unpriv && test->retval_unpriv ?
- test->retval_unpriv : test->retval;
-
- reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 &&
- (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
- strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned");
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
- if (reject_from_alignment) {
- printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n",
- strerror(errno));
- goto fail_log;
- }
-#endif
+
+ alignment_prevented_execution = 0;
+
if (expected_ret == ACCEPT) {
- if (fd_prog < 0 && !reject_from_alignment) {
+ if (fd_prog < 0) {
printf("FAIL\nFailed to load prog '%s'!\n",
strerror(errno));
goto fail_log;
}
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+ if (fd_prog >= 0 &&
+ (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS))
+ alignment_prevented_execution = 1;
+#endif
} else {
if (fd_prog >= 0) {
printf("FAIL\nUnexpected success to load!\n");
goto fail_log;
}
- if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err) && !reject_from_alignment) {
+ if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err)) {
printf("FAIL\nUnexpected error message!\n\tEXP: %s\n\tRES: %s\n",
expected_err, bpf_vlog);
goto fail_log;
}
}
- if (fd_prog >= 0) {
- __u8 tmp[TEST_DATA_LEN << 2];
- __u32 size_tmp = sizeof(tmp);
-
- if (unpriv)
- set_admin(true);
- err = bpf_prog_test_run(fd_prog, 1, test->data,
- sizeof(test->data), tmp, &size_tmp,
- &retval, NULL);
- if (unpriv)
- set_admin(false);
- if (err && errno != 524/*ENOTSUPP*/ && errno != EPERM) {
- printf("Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error\n");
+ if (test->insn_processed) {
+ uint32_t insn_processed;
+ char *proc;
+
+ proc = strstr(bpf_vlog, "processed ");
+ insn_processed = atoi(proc + 10);
+ if (test->insn_processed != insn_processed) {
+ printf("FAIL\nUnexpected insn_processed %u vs %u\n",
+ insn_processed, test->insn_processed);
goto fail_log;
}
- if (!err && retval != expected_val &&
- expected_val != POINTER_VALUE) {
- printf("FAIL retval %d != %d\n", retval, expected_val);
- goto fail_log;
+ }
+
+ run_errs = 0;
+ run_successes = 0;
+ if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0) {
+ uint32_t expected_val;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!test->runs) {
+ expected_val = unpriv && test->retval_unpriv ?
+ test->retval_unpriv : test->retval;
+
+ err = do_prog_test_run(fd_prog, unpriv, expected_val,
+ test->data, sizeof(test->data));
+ if (err)
+ run_errs++;
+ else
+ run_successes++;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < test->runs; i++) {
+ if (unpriv && test->retvals[i].retval_unpriv)
+ expected_val = test->retvals[i].retval_unpriv;
+ else
+ expected_val = test->retvals[i].retval;
+
+ err = do_prog_test_run(fd_prog, unpriv, expected_val,
+ test->retvals[i].data,
+ sizeof(test->retvals[i].data));
+ if (err) {
+ printf("(run %d/%d) ", i + 1, test->runs);
+ run_errs++;
+ } else {
+ run_successes++;
+ }
}
}
- (*passes)++;
- printf("OK%s\n", reject_from_alignment ?
- " (NOTE: reject due to unknown alignment)" : "");
+
+ if (!run_errs) {
+ (*passes)++;
+ if (run_successes > 1)
+ printf("%d cases ", run_successes);
+ printf("OK");
+ if (alignment_prevented_execution)
+ printf(" (NOTE: not executed due to unknown alignment)");
+ printf("\n");
+ } else {
+ printf("\n");
+ goto fail_log;
+ }
close_fds:
close(fd_prog);
for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++)
Powered by cgit, Gruvboxed by Blaster4385.