1 files changed, 47 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h b/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h
index d83763a5327c..e03b1ea23e0e 100644
--- a/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h
+++ b/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h
@@ -31,25 +31,9 @@ struct rb_root {
 	struct rb_node *rb_node;
 };
 
-/*
- * Leftmost-cached rbtrees.
- *
- * We do not cache the rightmost node based on footprint
- * size vs number of potential users that could benefit
- * from O(1) rb_last(). Just not worth it, users that want
- * this feature can always implement the logic explicitly.
- * Furthermore, users that want to cache both pointers may
- * find it a bit asymmetric, but that's ok.
- */
-struct rb_root_cached {
-	struct rb_root rb_root;
-	struct rb_node *rb_leftmost;
-};
-
 #define rb_parent(r)   ((struct rb_node *)((r)->__rb_parent_color & ~3))
 
 #define RB_ROOT	(struct rb_root) { NULL, }
-#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }
 #define	rb_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr, type, member)
 
 #define RB_EMPTY_ROOT(root)  (READ_ONCE((root)->rb_node) == NULL)
@@ -71,12 +55,6 @@ extern struct rb_node *rb_prev(const struct rb_node *);
 extern struct rb_node *rb_first(const struct rb_root *);
 extern struct rb_node *rb_last(const struct rb_root *);
 
-extern void rb_insert_color_cached(struct rb_node *,
-				   struct rb_root_cached *, bool);
-extern void rb_erase_cached(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root_cached *);
-/* Same as rb_first(), but O(1) */
-#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost
-
 /* Postorder iteration - always visit the parent after its children */
 extern struct rb_node *rb_first_postorder(const struct rb_root *);
 extern struct rb_node *rb_next_postorder(const struct rb_node *);
@@ -84,8 +62,6 @@ extern struct rb_node *rb_next_postorder(const struct rb_node *);
 /* Fast replacement of a single node without remove/rebalance/add/rebalance */
 extern void rb_replace_node(struct rb_node *victim, struct rb_node *new,
 			    struct rb_root *root);
-extern void rb_replace_node_cached(struct rb_node *victim, struct rb_node *new,
-				   struct rb_root_cached *root);
 
 static inline void rb_link_node(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent,
 				struct rb_node **rb_link)
@@ -129,4 +105,51 @@ static inline void rb_erase_init(struct rb_node *n, struct rb_root *root)
 	rb_erase(n, root);
 	RB_CLEAR_NODE(n);
 }
+
+/*
+ * Leftmost-cached rbtrees.
+ *
+ * We do not cache the rightmost node based on footprint
+ * size vs number of potential users that could benefit
+ * from O(1) rb_last(). Just not worth it, users that want
+ * this feature can always implement the logic explicitly.
+ * Furthermore, users that want to cache both pointers may
+ * find it a bit asymmetric, but that's ok.
+ */
+struct rb_root_cached {
+	struct rb_root rb_root;
+	struct rb_node *rb_leftmost;
+};
+
+#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }
+
+/* Same as rb_first(), but O(1) */
+#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost
+
+static inline void rb_insert_color_cached(struct rb_node *node,
+					  struct rb_root_cached *root,
+					  bool leftmost)
+{
+	if (leftmost)
+		root->rb_leftmost = node;
+	rb_insert_color(node, &root->rb_root);
+}
+
+static inline void rb_erase_cached(struct rb_node *node,
+				   struct rb_root_cached *root)
+{
+	if (root->rb_leftmost == node)
+		root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);
+	rb_erase(node, &root->rb_root);
+}
+
+static inline void rb_replace_node_cached(struct rb_node *victim,
+					  struct rb_node *new,
+					  struct rb_root_cached *root)
+{
+	if (root->rb_leftmost == victim)
+		root->rb_leftmost = new;
+	rb_replace_node(victim, new, &root->rb_root);
+}
+
 #endif /* __TOOLS_LINUX_PERF_RBTREE_H */