diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lock_events.h | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 154 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 63 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 20 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 170 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 47 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 12 |
8 files changed, 299 insertions, 173 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lock_events.h b/kernel/locking/lock_events.h index 8c7e7d25f09c..a6016b91803d 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lock_events.h +++ b/kernel/locking/lock_events.h @@ -57,4 +57,8 @@ static inline void __lockevent_add(enum lock_events event, int inc) #define lockevent_cond_inc(ev, c) #endif /* CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS */ + +ssize_t lockevent_read(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf, + size_t count, loff_t *ppos); + #endif /* __LOCKING_LOCK_EVENTS_H */ diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 4dfd2f3e09b2..e85b5ad3e206 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ void get_usage_chars(struct lock_class *class, char usage[LOCK_USAGE_CHARS]) usage[i] = '\0'; } -static void __print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class) +static void __print_lock_name(struct held_lock *hlock, struct lock_class *class) { char str[KSYM_NAME_LEN]; const char *name; @@ -724,17 +724,19 @@ static void __print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class) printk(KERN_CONT "#%d", class->name_version); if (class->subclass) printk(KERN_CONT "/%d", class->subclass); + if (hlock && class->print_fn) + class->print_fn(hlock->instance); } } -static void print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class) +static void print_lock_name(struct held_lock *hlock, struct lock_class *class) { char usage[LOCK_USAGE_CHARS]; get_usage_chars(class, usage); printk(KERN_CONT " ("); - __print_lock_name(class); + __print_lock_name(hlock, class); printk(KERN_CONT "){%s}-{%d:%d}", usage, class->wait_type_outer ?: class->wait_type_inner, class->wait_type_inner); @@ -772,7 +774,7 @@ static void print_lock(struct held_lock *hlock) } printk(KERN_CONT "%px", hlock->instance); - print_lock_name(lock); + print_lock_name(hlock, lock); printk(KERN_CONT ", at: %pS\n", (void *)hlock->acquire_ip); } @@ -817,34 +819,26 @@ static int very_verbose(struct lock_class *class) * Is this the address of a static object: */ #ifdef __KERNEL__ -/* - * Check if an address is part of freed initmem. After initmem is freed, - * memory can be allocated from it, and such allocations would then have - * addresses within the range [_stext, _end]. - */ -#ifndef arch_is_kernel_initmem_freed -static int arch_is_kernel_initmem_freed(unsigned long addr) -{ - if (system_state < SYSTEM_FREEING_INITMEM) - return 0; - - return init_section_contains((void *)addr, 1); -} -#endif - static int static_obj(const void *obj) { - unsigned long start = (unsigned long) &_stext, - end = (unsigned long) &_end, - addr = (unsigned long) obj; + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) obj; - if (arch_is_kernel_initmem_freed(addr)) - return 0; + if (is_kernel_core_data(addr)) + return 1; /* - * static variable? + * keys are allowed in the __ro_after_init section. */ - if ((addr >= start) && (addr < end)) + if (is_kernel_rodata(addr)) + return 1; + + /* + * in initdata section and used during bootup only? + * NOTE: On some platforms the initdata section is + * outside of the _stext ... _end range. + */ + if (system_state < SYSTEM_FREEING_INITMEM && + init_section_contains((void *)addr, 1)) return 1; /* @@ -1868,7 +1862,7 @@ print_circular_bug_entry(struct lock_list *target, int depth) if (debug_locks_silent) return; printk("\n-> #%u", depth); - print_lock_name(target->class); + print_lock_name(NULL, target->class); printk(KERN_CONT ":\n"); print_lock_trace(target->trace, 6); } @@ -1899,11 +1893,11 @@ print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src, */ if (parent != source) { printk("Chain exists of:\n "); - __print_lock_name(source); + __print_lock_name(src, source); printk(KERN_CONT " --> "); - __print_lock_name(parent); + __print_lock_name(NULL, parent); printk(KERN_CONT " --> "); - __print_lock_name(target); + __print_lock_name(tgt, target); printk(KERN_CONT "\n\n"); } @@ -1914,13 +1908,13 @@ print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src, printk(" rlock("); else printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(target); + __print_lock_name(tgt, target); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(parent); + __print_lock_name(NULL, parent); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(target); + __print_lock_name(tgt, target); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); if (src_read != 0) printk(" rlock("); @@ -1928,7 +1922,7 @@ print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src, printk(" sync("); else printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(source); + __print_lock_name(src, source); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); } @@ -2154,6 +2148,8 @@ check_path(struct held_lock *target, struct lock_list *src_entry, return ret; } +static void print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *, struct held_lock *); + /* * Prove that the dependency graph starting at <src> can not * lead to <target>. If it can, there is a circle when adding @@ -2185,7 +2181,10 @@ check_noncircular(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target, *trace = save_trace(); } - print_circular_bug(&src_entry, target_entry, src, target); + if (src->class_idx == target->class_idx) + print_deadlock_bug(current, src, target); + else + print_circular_bug(&src_entry, target_entry, src, target); } return ret; @@ -2346,7 +2345,7 @@ static void print_lock_class_header(struct lock_class *class, int depth) int bit; printk("%*s->", depth, ""); - print_lock_name(class); + print_lock_name(NULL, class); #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP printk(KERN_CONT " ops: %lu", debug_class_ops_read(class)); #endif @@ -2528,11 +2527,11 @@ print_irq_lock_scenario(struct lock_list *safe_entry, */ if (middle_class != unsafe_class) { printk("Chain exists of:\n "); - __print_lock_name(safe_class); + __print_lock_name(NULL, safe_class); printk(KERN_CONT " --> "); - __print_lock_name(middle_class); + __print_lock_name(NULL, middle_class); printk(KERN_CONT " --> "); - __print_lock_name(unsafe_class); + __print_lock_name(NULL, unsafe_class); printk(KERN_CONT "\n\n"); } @@ -2540,18 +2539,18 @@ print_irq_lock_scenario(struct lock_list *safe_entry, printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n"); printk(" ---- ----\n"); printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(unsafe_class); + __print_lock_name(NULL, unsafe_class); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk(" local_irq_disable();\n"); printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(safe_class); + __print_lock_name(NULL, safe_class); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(middle_class); + __print_lock_name(NULL, middle_class); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk(" <Interrupt>\n"); printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(safe_class); + __print_lock_name(NULL, safe_class); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); } @@ -2588,20 +2587,20 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr, pr_warn("\nand this task is already holding:\n"); print_lock(prev); pr_warn("which would create a new lock dependency:\n"); - print_lock_name(hlock_class(prev)); + print_lock_name(prev, hlock_class(prev)); pr_cont(" ->"); - print_lock_name(hlock_class(next)); + print_lock_name(next, hlock_class(next)); pr_cont("\n"); pr_warn("\nbut this new dependency connects a %s-irq-safe lock:\n", irqclass); - print_lock_name(backwards_entry->class); + print_lock_name(NULL, backwards_entry->class); pr_warn("\n... which became %s-irq-safe at:\n", irqclass); print_lock_trace(backwards_entry->class->usage_traces[bit1], 1); pr_warn("\nto a %s-irq-unsafe lock:\n", irqclass); - print_lock_name(forwards_entry->class); + print_lock_name(NULL, forwards_entry->class); pr_warn("\n... which became %s-irq-unsafe at:\n", irqclass); pr_warn("..."); @@ -2971,10 +2970,10 @@ print_deadlock_scenario(struct held_lock *nxt, struct held_lock *prv) printk(" CPU0\n"); printk(" ----\n"); printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(prev); + __print_lock_name(prv, prev); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(next); + __print_lock_name(nxt, next); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); printk(" May be due to missing lock nesting notation\n\n"); @@ -2984,6 +2983,8 @@ static void print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, struct held_lock *next) { + struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(prev); + if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent) return; @@ -2998,6 +2999,11 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, pr_warn("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n"); print_lock(prev); + if (class->cmp_fn) { + pr_warn("and the lock comparison function returns %i:\n", + class->cmp_fn(prev->instance, next->instance)); + } + pr_warn("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n"); print_deadlock_scenario(next, prev); lockdep_print_held_locks(curr); @@ -3019,6 +3025,7 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, static int check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next) { + struct lock_class *class; struct held_lock *prev; struct held_lock *nest = NULL; int i; @@ -3039,6 +3046,12 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next) if ((next->read == 2) && prev->read) continue; + class = hlock_class(prev); + + if (class->cmp_fn && + class->cmp_fn(prev->instance, next->instance) < 0) + continue; + /* * We're holding the nest_lock, which serializes this lock's * nesting behaviour. @@ -3100,6 +3113,14 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, return 2; } + if (prev->class_idx == next->class_idx) { + struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(prev); + + if (class->cmp_fn && + class->cmp_fn(prev->instance, next->instance) < 0) + return 2; + } + /* * Prove that the new <prev> -> <next> dependency would not * create a circular dependency in the graph. (We do this by @@ -3576,7 +3597,7 @@ static void print_chain_keys_chain(struct lock_chain *chain) hlock_id = chain_hlocks[chain->base + i]; chain_key = print_chain_key_iteration(hlock_id, chain_key); - print_lock_name(lock_classes + chain_hlock_class_idx(hlock_id)); + print_lock_name(NULL, lock_classes + chain_hlock_class_idx(hlock_id)); printk("\n"); } } @@ -3933,11 +3954,11 @@ static void print_usage_bug_scenario(struct held_lock *lock) printk(" CPU0\n"); printk(" ----\n"); printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(class); + __print_lock_name(lock, class); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk(" <Interrupt>\n"); printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(class); + __print_lock_name(lock, class); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); } @@ -4023,7 +4044,7 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr, pr_warn("but this lock took another, %s-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass); else pr_warn("but this lock was taken by another, %s-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass); - print_lock_name(other->class); + print_lock_name(NULL, other->class); pr_warn("\n\nand interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.\n\n"); pr_warn("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n"); @@ -4896,6 +4917,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_init_map_type); struct lock_class_key __lockdep_no_validate__; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__lockdep_no_validate__); +#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING +void lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn(struct lockdep_map *lock, lock_cmp_fn cmp_fn, + lock_print_fn print_fn) +{ + struct lock_class *class = lock->class_cache[0]; + unsigned long flags; + + raw_local_irq_save(flags); + lockdep_recursion_inc(); + + if (!class) + class = register_lock_class(lock, 0, 0); + + if (class) { + WARN_ON(class->cmp_fn && class->cmp_fn != cmp_fn); + WARN_ON(class->print_fn && class->print_fn != print_fn); + + class->cmp_fn = cmp_fn; + class->print_fn = print_fn; + } + + lockdep_recursion_finish(); + raw_local_irq_restore(flags); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn); +#endif + static void print_lock_nested_lock_not_held(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock) diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c index 153ddc4c47ef..270c7f80ce84 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c @@ -33,24 +33,20 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>"); -torture_param(int, nwriters_stress, -1, - "Number of write-locking stress-test threads"); -torture_param(int, nreaders_stress, -1, - "Number of read-locking stress-test threads"); +torture_param(int, nwriters_stress, -1, "Number of write-locking stress-test threads"); +torture_param(int, nreaders_stress, -1, "Number of read-locking stress-test threads"); +torture_param(int, long_hold, 100, "Do occasional long hold of lock (ms), 0=disable"); torture_param(int, onoff_holdoff, 0, "Time after boot before CPU hotplugs (s)"); -torture_param(int, onoff_interval, 0, - "Time between CPU hotplugs (s), 0=disable"); -torture_param(int, shuffle_interval, 3, - "Number of jiffies between shuffles, 0=disable"); +torture_param(int, onoff_interval, 0, "Time between CPU hotplugs (s), 0=disable"); +torture_param(int, shuffle_interval, 3, "Number of jiffies between shuffles, 0=disable"); torture_param(int, shutdown_secs, 0, "Shutdown time (j), <= zero to disable."); -torture_param(int, stat_interval, 60, - "Number of seconds between stats printk()s"); +torture_param(int, stat_interval, 60, "Number of seconds between stats printk()s"); torture_param(int, stutter, 5, "Number of jiffies to run/halt test, 0=disable"); torture_param(int, rt_boost, 2, - "Do periodic rt-boost. 0=Disable, 1=Only for rt_mutex, 2=For all lock types."); + "Do periodic rt-boost. 0=Disable, 1=Only for rt_mutex, 2=For all lock types."); torture_param(int, rt_boost_factor, 50, "A factor determining how often rt-boost happens."); -torture_param(int, verbose, 1, - "Enable verbose debugging printk()s"); +torture_param(int, writer_fifo, 0, "Run writers at sched_set_fifo() priority"); +torture_param(int, verbose, 1, "Enable verbose debugging printk()s"); torture_param(int, nested_locks, 0, "Number of nested locks (max = 8)"); /* Going much higher trips "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!" errors */ #define MAX_NESTED_LOCKS 8 @@ -120,7 +116,7 @@ static int torture_lock_busted_write_lock(int tid __maybe_unused) static void torture_lock_busted_write_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp) { - const unsigned long longdelay_ms = 100; + const unsigned long longdelay_ms = long_hold ? long_hold : ULONG_MAX; /* We want a long delay occasionally to force massive contention. */ if (!(torture_random(trsp) % @@ -198,16 +194,18 @@ __acquires(torture_spinlock) static void torture_spin_lock_write_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp) { const unsigned long shortdelay_us = 2; - const unsigned long longdelay_ms = 100; + const unsigned long longdelay_ms = long_hold ? long_hold : ULONG_MAX; + unsigned long j; /* We want a short delay mostly to emulate likely code, and * we want a long delay occasionally to force massive contention. */ - if (!(torture_random(trsp) % - (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2000 * longdelay_ms))) + if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2000 * longdelay_ms))) { + j = jiffies; mdelay(longdelay_ms); - if (!(torture_random(trsp) % - (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2 * shortdelay_us))) + pr_alert("%s: delay = %lu jiffies.\n", __func__, jiffies - j); + } + if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 200 * shortdelay_us))) udelay(shortdelay_us); if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 20000))) torture_preempt_schedule(); /* Allow test to be preempted. */ @@ -322,7 +320,7 @@ __acquires(torture_rwlock) static void torture_rwlock_write_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp) { const unsigned long shortdelay_us = 2; - const unsigned long longdelay_ms = 100; + const unsigned long longdelay_ms = long_hold ? long_hold : ULONG_MAX; /* We want a short delay mostly to emulate likely code, and * we want a long delay occasionally to force massive contention. @@ -455,14 +453,12 @@ __acquires(torture_mutex) static void torture_mutex_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp) { - const unsigned long longdelay_ms = 100; + const unsigned long longdelay_ms = long_hold ? long_hold : ULONG_MAX; /* We want a long delay occasionally to force massive contention. */ if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2000 * longdelay_ms))) mdelay(longdelay_ms * 5); - else - mdelay(longdelay_ms / 5); if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 20000))) torture_preempt_schedule(); /* Allow test to be preempted. */ } @@ -630,7 +626,7 @@ __acquires(torture_rtmutex) static void torture_rtmutex_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp) { const unsigned long shortdelay_us = 2; - const unsigned long longdelay_ms = 100; + const unsigned long longdelay_ms = long_hold ? long_hold : ULONG_MAX; /* * We want a short delay mostly to emulate likely code, and @@ -640,7 +636,7 @@ static void torture_rtmutex_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp) (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2000 * longdelay_ms))) mdelay(longdelay_ms); if (!(torture_random(trsp) % - (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2 * shortdelay_us))) + (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 200 * shortdelay_us))) udelay(shortdelay_us); if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 20000))) torture_preempt_schedule(); /* Allow test to be preempted. */ @@ -695,14 +691,12 @@ __acquires(torture_rwsem) static void torture_rwsem_write_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp) { - const unsigned long longdelay_ms = 100; + const unsigned long longdelay_ms = long_hold ? long_hold : ULONG_MAX; /* We want a long delay occasionally to force massive contention. */ if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2000 * longdelay_ms))) mdelay(longdelay_ms * 10); - else - mdelay(longdelay_ms / 10); if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 20000))) torture_preempt_schedule(); /* Allow test to be preempted. */ } @@ -816,7 +810,8 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg) bool skip_main_lock; VERBOSE_TOROUT_STRING("lock_torture_writer task started"); - set_user_nice(current, MAX_NICE); + if (!rt_task(current)) + set_user_nice(current, MAX_NICE); do { if ((torture_random(&rand) & 0xfffff) == 0) @@ -848,8 +843,8 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg) lwsp->n_lock_acquired++; } - cxt.cur_ops->write_delay(&rand); if (!skip_main_lock) { + cxt.cur_ops->write_delay(&rand); lock_is_write_held = false; WRITE_ONCE(last_lock_release, jiffies); cxt.cur_ops->writeunlock(tid); @@ -1022,8 +1017,7 @@ static void lock_torture_cleanup(void) if (writer_tasks) { for (i = 0; i < cxt.nrealwriters_stress; i++) - torture_stop_kthread(lock_torture_writer, - writer_tasks[i]); + torture_stop_kthread(lock_torture_writer, writer_tasks[i]); kfree(writer_tasks); writer_tasks = NULL; } @@ -1251,8 +1245,9 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void) goto create_reader; /* Create writer. */ - firsterr = torture_create_kthread(lock_torture_writer, &cxt.lwsa[i], - writer_tasks[i]); + firsterr = torture_create_kthread_cb(lock_torture_writer, &cxt.lwsa[i], + writer_tasks[i], + writer_fifo ? sched_set_fifo : NULL); if (torture_init_error(firsterr)) goto unwind; diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h index 6afc249ce697..6a0184e9c234 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h @@ -486,6 +486,16 @@ gotlock: } /* + * Include the architecture specific callee-save thunk of the + * __pv_queued_spin_unlock(). This thunk is put together with + * __pv_queued_spin_unlock() to make the callee-save thunk and the real unlock + * function close to each other sharing consecutive instruction cachelines. + * Alternatively, architecture specific version of __pv_queued_spin_unlock() + * can be defined. + */ +#include <asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h> + +/* * PV versions of the unlock fastpath and slowpath functions to be used * instead of queued_spin_unlock(). */ @@ -533,16 +543,6 @@ __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u8 locked) pv_kick(node->cpu); } -/* - * Include the architecture specific callee-save thunk of the - * __pv_queued_spin_unlock(). This thunk is put together with - * __pv_queued_spin_unlock() to make the callee-save thunk and the real unlock - * function close to each other sharing consecutive instruction cachelines. - * Alternatively, architecture specific version of __pv_queued_spin_unlock() - * can be defined. - */ -#include <asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h> - #ifndef __pv_queued_spin_unlock __visible __lockfunc void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) { diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index 728f434de2bb..21db0df0eb00 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -333,21 +333,43 @@ static __always_inline int __waiter_prio(struct task_struct *task) return prio; } +/* + * Update the waiter->tree copy of the sort keys. + */ static __always_inline void waiter_update_prio(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct task_struct *task) { - waiter->prio = __waiter_prio(task); - waiter->deadline = task->dl.deadline; + lockdep_assert_held(&waiter->lock->wait_lock); + lockdep_assert(RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree.entry)); + + waiter->tree.prio = __waiter_prio(task); + waiter->tree.deadline = task->dl.deadline; +} + +/* + * Update the waiter->pi_tree copy of the sort keys (from the tree copy). + */ +static __always_inline void +waiter_clone_prio(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct task_struct *task) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&waiter->lock->wait_lock); + lockdep_assert_held(&task->pi_lock); + lockdep_assert(RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree.entry)); + + waiter->pi_tree.prio = waiter->tree.prio; + waiter->pi_tree.deadline = waiter->tree.deadline; } /* - * Only use with rt_mutex_waiter_{less,equal}() + * Only use with rt_waiter_node_{less,equal}() */ +#define task_to_waiter_node(p) \ + &(struct rt_waiter_node){ .prio = __waiter_prio(p), .deadline = (p)->dl.deadline } #define task_to_waiter(p) \ - &(struct rt_mutex_waiter){ .prio = __waiter_prio(p), .deadline = (p)->dl.deadline } + &(struct rt_mutex_waiter){ .tree = *task_to_waiter_node(p) } -static __always_inline int rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *right) +static __always_inline int rt_waiter_node_less(struct rt_waiter_node *left, + struct rt_waiter_node *right) { if (left->prio < right->prio) return 1; @@ -364,8 +386,8 @@ static __always_inline int rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left, return 0; } -static __always_inline int rt_mutex_waiter_equal(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *right) +static __always_inline int rt_waiter_node_equal(struct rt_waiter_node *left, + struct rt_waiter_node *right) { if (left->prio != right->prio) return 0; @@ -385,7 +407,7 @@ static __always_inline int rt_mutex_waiter_equal(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left, static inline bool rt_mutex_steal(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter) { - if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, top_waiter)) + if (rt_waiter_node_less(&waiter->tree, &top_waiter->tree)) return true; #ifdef RT_MUTEX_BUILD_SPINLOCKS @@ -393,30 +415,30 @@ static inline bool rt_mutex_steal(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, * Note that RT tasks are excluded from same priority (lateral) * steals to prevent the introduction of an unbounded latency. */ - if (rt_prio(waiter->prio) || dl_prio(waiter->prio)) + if (rt_prio(waiter->tree.prio) || dl_prio(waiter->tree.prio)) return false; - return rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, top_waiter); + return rt_waiter_node_equal(&waiter->tree, &top_waiter->tree); #else return false; #endif } #define __node_2_waiter(node) \ - rb_entry((node), struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry) + rb_entry((node), struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry) static __always_inline bool __waiter_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) { struct rt_mutex_waiter *aw = __node_2_waiter(a); struct rt_mutex_waiter *bw = __node_2_waiter(b); - if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(aw, bw)) + if (rt_waiter_node_less(&aw->tree, &bw->tree)) return 1; if (!build_ww_mutex()) return 0; - if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(bw, aw)) + if (rt_waiter_node_less(&bw->tree, &aw->tree)) return 0; /* NOTE: relies on waiter->ww_ctx being set before insertion */ @@ -434,48 +456,58 @@ static __always_inline bool __waiter_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_nod static __always_inline void rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { - rb_add_cached(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters, __waiter_less); + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + + rb_add_cached(&waiter->tree.entry, &lock->waiters, __waiter_less); } static __always_inline void rt_mutex_dequeue(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { - if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry)) + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree.entry)) return; - rb_erase_cached(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry); + rb_erase_cached(&waiter->tree.entry, &lock->waiters); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree.entry); } -#define __node_2_pi_waiter(node) \ - rb_entry((node), struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry) +#define __node_2_rt_node(node) \ + rb_entry((node), struct rt_waiter_node, entry) -static __always_inline bool -__pi_waiter_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) +static __always_inline bool __pi_waiter_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) { - return rt_mutex_waiter_less(__node_2_pi_waiter(a), __node_2_pi_waiter(b)); + return rt_waiter_node_less(__node_2_rt_node(a), __node_2_rt_node(b)); } static __always_inline void rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { - rb_add_cached(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters, __pi_waiter_less); + lockdep_assert_held(&task->pi_lock); + + rb_add_cached(&waiter->pi_tree.entry, &task->pi_waiters, __pi_waiter_less); } static __always_inline void rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { - if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry)) + lockdep_assert_held(&task->pi_lock); + + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree.entry)) return; - rb_erase_cached(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry); + rb_erase_cached(&waiter->pi_tree.entry, &task->pi_waiters); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree.entry); } -static __always_inline void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *p) +static __always_inline void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct task_struct *p) { struct task_struct *pi_task = NULL; + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + lockdep_assert(rt_mutex_owner(lock) == p); lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock); if (task_has_pi_waiters(p)) @@ -571,9 +603,14 @@ static __always_inline struct rt_mutex_base *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_st * Chain walk basics and protection scope * * [R] refcount on task - * [P] task->pi_lock held + * [Pn] task->pi_lock held * [L] rtmutex->wait_lock held * + * Normal locking order: + * + * rtmutex->wait_lock + * task->pi_lock + * * Step Description Protected by * function arguments: * @task [R] @@ -588,27 +625,32 @@ static __always_inline struct rt_mutex_base *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_st * again: * loop_sanity_check(); * retry: - * [1] lock(task->pi_lock); [R] acquire [P] - * [2] waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; [P] - * [3] check_exit_conditions_1(); [P] - * [4] lock = waiter->lock; [P] - * [5] if (!try_lock(lock->wait_lock)) { [P] try to acquire [L] - * unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P] + * [1] lock(task->pi_lock); [R] acquire [P1] + * [2] waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; [P1] + * [3] check_exit_conditions_1(); [P1] + * [4] lock = waiter->lock; [P1] + * [5] if (!try_lock(lock->wait_lock)) { [P1] try to acquire [L] + * unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P1] * goto retry; * } - * [6] check_exit_conditions_2(); [P] + [L] - * [7] requeue_lock_waiter(lock, waiter); [P] + [L] - * [8] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P] + * [6] check_exit_conditions_2(); [P1] + [L] + * [7] requeue_lock_waiter(lock, waiter); [P1] + [L] + * [8] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P1] * put_task_struct(task); release [R] * [9] check_exit_conditions_3(); [L] * [10] task = owner(lock); [L] * get_task_struct(task); [L] acquire [R] - * lock(task->pi_lock); [L] acquire [P] - * [11] requeue_pi_waiter(tsk, waiters(lock));[P] + [L] - * [12] check_exit_conditions_4(); [P] + [L] - * [13] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P] + * lock(task->pi_lock); [L] acquire [P2] + * [11] requeue_pi_waiter(tsk, waiters(lock));[P2] + [L] + * [12] check_exit_conditions_4(); [P2] + [L] + * [13] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P2] * unlock(lock->wait_lock); release [L] * goto again; + * + * Where P1 is the blocking task and P2 is the lock owner; going up one step + * the owner becomes the next blocked task etc.. + * +* */ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, @@ -756,7 +798,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * enabled we continue, but stop the requeueing in the chain * walk. */ - if (rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) { + if (rt_waiter_node_equal(&waiter->tree, task_to_waiter_node(task))) { if (!detect_deadlock) goto out_unlock_pi; else @@ -764,13 +806,18 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, } /* - * [4] Get the next lock + * [4] Get the next lock; per holding task->pi_lock we can't unblock + * and guarantee @lock's existence. */ lock = waiter->lock; /* * [5] We need to trylock here as we are holding task->pi_lock, * which is the reverse lock order versus the other rtmutex * operations. + * + * Per the above, holding task->pi_lock guarantees lock exists, so + * inverting this lock order is infeasible from a life-time + * perspective. */ if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) { raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock); @@ -874,17 +921,18 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * or * * DL CBS enforcement advancing the effective deadline. - * - * Even though pi_waiters also uses these fields, and that tree is only - * updated in [11], we can do this here, since we hold [L], which - * serializes all pi_waiters access and rb_erase() does not care about - * the values of the node being removed. */ waiter_update_prio(waiter, task); rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter); - /* [8] Release the task */ + /* + * [8] Release the (blocking) task in preparation for + * taking the owner task in [10]. + * + * Since we hold lock->waiter_lock, task cannot unblock, even if we + * release task->pi_lock. + */ raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); put_task_struct(task); @@ -908,7 +956,12 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, return 0; } - /* [10] Grab the next task, i.e. the owner of @lock */ + /* + * [10] Grab the next task, i.e. the owner of @lock + * + * Per holding lock->wait_lock and checking for !owner above, there + * must be an owner and it cannot go away. + */ task = get_task_struct(rt_mutex_owner(lock)); raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); @@ -921,8 +974,9 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * and adjust the priority of the owner. */ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter); + waiter_clone_prio(waiter, task); rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter); - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, task); } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) { /* @@ -937,8 +991,9 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, */ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter); waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); + waiter_clone_prio(waiter, task); rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter); - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, task); } else { /* * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority @@ -1154,6 +1209,7 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, waiter->task = task; waiter->lock = lock; waiter_update_prio(waiter, task); + waiter_clone_prio(waiter, task); /* Get the top priority waiter on the lock */ if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) @@ -1187,7 +1243,7 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter); rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter); - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, owner); if (owner->pi_blocked_on) chain_walk = 1; } else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk)) { @@ -1234,6 +1290,8 @@ static void __sched mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh, { struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter; + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + raw_spin_lock(¤t->pi_lock); waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); @@ -1246,7 +1304,7 @@ static void __sched mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh, * task unblocks. */ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter); - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, current); /* * As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays @@ -1482,7 +1540,7 @@ static void __sched remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, owner); /* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */ next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner); diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c index cb9fdff76a8a..a6974d044593 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; - if (!waiter || rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) { + if (!waiter || rt_waiter_node_equal(&waiter->tree, task_to_waiter_node(task))) { raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); return; } diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h index c47e8361bfb5..1162e07cdaea 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h @@ -17,27 +17,44 @@ #include <linux/rtmutex.h> #include <linux/sched/wake_q.h> + +/* + * This is a helper for the struct rt_mutex_waiter below. A waiter goes in two + * separate trees and they need their own copy of the sort keys because of + * different locking requirements. + * + * @entry: rbtree node to enqueue into the waiters tree + * @prio: Priority of the waiter + * @deadline: Deadline of the waiter if applicable + * + * See rt_waiter_node_less() and waiter_*_prio(). + */ +struct rt_waiter_node { + struct rb_node entry; + int prio; + u64 deadline; +}; + /* * This is the control structure for tasks blocked on a rt_mutex, * which is allocated on the kernel stack on of the blocked task. * - * @tree_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex waiters tree - * @pi_tree_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex owner waiters tree + * @tree: node to enqueue into the mutex waiters tree + * @pi_tree: node to enqueue into the mutex owner waiters tree * @task: task reference to the blocked task * @lock: Pointer to the rt_mutex on which the waiter blocks * @wake_state: Wakeup state to use (TASK_NORMAL or TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT) - * @prio: Priority of the waiter - * @deadline: Deadline of the waiter if applicable * @ww_ctx: WW context pointer + * + * @tree is ordered by @lock->wait_lock + * @pi_tree is ordered by rt_mutex_owner(@lock)->pi_lock */ struct rt_mutex_waiter { - struct rb_node tree_entry; - struct rb_node pi_tree_entry; + struct rt_waiter_node tree; + struct rt_waiter_node pi_tree; struct task_struct *task; struct rt_mutex_base *lock; unsigned int wake_state; - int prio; - u64 deadline; struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx; }; @@ -105,7 +122,7 @@ static inline bool rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, { struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters); - return rb_entry(leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry) == waiter; + return rb_entry(leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry) == waiter; } static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) @@ -113,8 +130,10 @@ static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base * struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters); struct rt_mutex_waiter *w = NULL; + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + if (leftmost) { - w = rb_entry(leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); + w = rb_entry(leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry); BUG_ON(w->lock != lock); } return w; @@ -127,8 +146,10 @@ static inline int task_has_pi_waiters(struct task_struct *p) static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p) { + lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock); + return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters.rb_leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter, - pi_tree_entry); + pi_tree.entry); } #define RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS 1UL @@ -190,8 +211,8 @@ static inline void debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) static inline void rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(waiter); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree.entry); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree.entry); waiter->wake_state = TASK_NORMAL; waiter->task = NULL; } diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h index 56f139201f24..3ad2cc4823e5 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h +++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h @@ -96,25 +96,25 @@ __ww_waiter_first(struct rt_mutex *lock) struct rb_node *n = rb_first(&lock->rtmutex.waiters.rb_root); if (!n) return NULL; - return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); + return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry); } static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * __ww_waiter_next(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) { - struct rb_node *n = rb_next(&w->tree_entry); + struct rb_node *n = rb_next(&w->tree.entry); if (!n) return NULL; - return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); + return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry); } static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * __ww_waiter_prev(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) { - struct rb_node *n = rb_prev(&w->tree_entry); + struct rb_node *n = rb_prev(&w->tree.entry); if (!n) return NULL; - return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); + return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry); } static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ __ww_waiter_last(struct rt_mutex *lock) struct rb_node *n = rb_last(&lock->rtmutex.waiters.rb_root); if (!n) return NULL; - return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); + return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry); } static inline void |