diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 28 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c index 6a88ec024e2f..1ba2f788b2c3 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c @@ -214,12 +214,34 @@ static int handle_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } /* - * Guest usage of a ptrauth instruction (which the guest EL1 did not turn into - * a NOP). If we get here, it is that we didn't fixup ptrauth on exit, and all - * that we can do is give the guest an UNDEF. + * Two possibilities to handle a trapping ptrauth instruction: + * + * - Guest usage of a ptrauth instruction (which the guest EL1 did not + * turn into a NOP). If we get here, it is that we didn't fixup + * ptrauth on exit, and all that we can do is give the guest an + * UNDEF (as the guest isn't supposed to use ptrauth without being + * told it could). + * + * - Running an L2 NV guest while L1 has left HCR_EL2.API==0, and for + * which we reinject the exception into L1. API==1 is handled as a + * fixup so the only way to get here is when API==0. + * + * Anything else is an emulation bug (hence the WARN_ON + UNDEF). */ static int kvm_handle_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { + if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) { + kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu); + return 1; + } + + if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu) && !is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu)) { + kvm_inject_nested_sync(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu)); + return 1; + } + + /* Really shouldn't be here! */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu); return 1; } |