diff options
author | Chris Wilson <[email protected]> | 2017-11-14 16:27:19 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sumit Semwal <[email protected]> | 2017-11-21 22:37:05 +0530 |
commit | 03e4e0a9e02cf703da331ff6cfd57d0be9bf5692 (patch) | |
tree | dc27892dd1af53bf9d6f5f1925762e7b8286f992 /tools/perf/scripts/python/stackcollapse.py | |
parent | 70c5f93669249886b151812076509f30569aff80 (diff) |
dma-buf/fence: Fix lock inversion within dma-fence-array
Ages ago Rob Clark noted,
"Currently with fence-array, we have a potential deadlock situation. If
we fence_add_callback() on an array-fence, the array-fence's lock is
acquired first, and in it's ->enable_signaling() callback, it will install
cbs on it's array-member fences, so the array-member's lock is acquired
second.
But in the signal path, the array-member's lock is acquired first, and
the array-fence's lock acquired second."
Rob proposed either extensive changes to dma-fence to unnest the
fence-array signaling, or to defer the signaling onto a workqueue. This
is a more refined version of the later, that should keep the latency
of the fence signaling to a minimum by using an irq-work, which is
executed asap.
Reported-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
References: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <[email protected]>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/stackcollapse.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions