diff options
author | Ming Lei <[email protected]> | 2019-09-23 23:12:09 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jens Axboe <[email protected]> | 2019-09-26 00:45:51 -0600 |
commit | b89f625e28d44552083f43752f62d8621ded0a04 (patch) | |
tree | 473504d2f44f9ec2ff427649a8434b2faccec793 /tools/perf/scripts/python/exported-sql-viewer.py | |
parent | 284b94be1925dbe035ce5218d8b5c197321262c7 (diff) |
block: don't release queue's sysfs lock during switching elevator
cecf5d87ff20 ("block: split .sysfs_lock into two locks") starts to
release & acquire sysfs_lock before registering/un-registering elevator
queue during switching elevator for avoiding potential deadlock from
showing & storing 'queue/iosched' attributes and removing elevator's
kobject.
Turns out there isn't such deadlock because 'q->sysfs_lock' isn't
required in .show & .store of queue/iosched's attributes, and just
elevator's sysfs lock is acquired in elv_iosched_store() and
elv_iosched_show(). So it is safe to hold queue's sysfs lock when
registering/un-registering elevator queue.
The biggest issue is that commit cecf5d87ff20 assumes that concurrent
write on 'queue/scheduler' can't happen. However, this assumption isn't
true, because kernfs_fop_write() only guarantees that concurrent write
aren't called on the same open file, but the write could be from
different open on the file. So we can't release & re-acquire queue's
sysfs lock during switching elevator, otherwise use-after-free on
elevator could be triggered.
Fixes the issue by not releasing queue's sysfs lock during switching
elevator.
Fixes: cecf5d87ff20 ("block: split .sysfs_lock into two locks")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/exported-sql-viewer.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions