vsprintf: Avoid confusion between invalid address and value

We are able to detect invalid values handled by %p[iI] printk specifier.
The current error message is "invalid address". It might cause confusion
against "(efault)" reported by the generic valid_pointer_address() check.

Let's unify the style and use the more appropriate error code description
"(einval)".

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
To: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: "Tobin C . Harding" <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions