sched_domain: Annotate RCU pointers properly

The scheduler uses RCU API in various places to access sched_domain
pointers. These cause sparse errors as below.

Many new errors show up because of an annotation check I added to
rcu_assign_pointer(). Let us annotate the pointers correctly which also
will help sparse catch any potential future bugs.

This fixes the following sparse errors:

  rt.c:1681:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  deadline.c:1904:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  core.c:519:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  core.c:1634:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:6193:14: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9883:22: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9897:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  sched.h:1287:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  topology.c:612:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  topology.c:615:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  sched.h:1300:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  topology.c:618:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  sched.h:1287:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  topology.c:621:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  sched.h:1300:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  topology.c:624:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  topology.c:671:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  stats.c:45:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:5998:15: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:5989:15: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:5998:15: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:5989:15: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:6120:19: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:6506:14: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:6515:14: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:6623:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:5970:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:8642:21: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9253:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9331:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9519:15: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9533:14: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9542:14: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9567:14: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9597:14: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9421:16: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
  fair.c:9421:16: error: incompatible types in comparison expression

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
[ From an RCU perspective. ]
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <[email protected]>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions