x86/boot: Simplify EBDA-vs-BIOS reservation logic

Both the intent and the effect of reserve_bios_regions() is simple:
reserve the range from the apparent BIOS start (suitably filtered)
through 1MB and, if the EBDA start address is sensible, extend that
reservation downward to cover the EBDA as well.

The code is overcomplicated, though, and contains head-scratchers
like:

	if (ebda_start < BIOS_START_MIN)
		ebda_start = BIOS_START_MAX;

That snipped is trying to say "if ebda_start < BIOS_START_MIN,
ignore it".

Simplify it: reorder the code so that it makes sense.  This should
have no functional effect under any circumstances.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Toshi Kani <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ef89c0c761be20ead8bd9a3275743e6259b6092a.1469135598.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions