x86/speculation: Prepare for conditional IBPB in switch_mm()

The IBPB speculation barrier is issued from switch_mm() when the kernel
switches to a user space task with a different mm than the user space task
which ran last on the same CPU.

An additional optimization is to avoid IBPB when the incoming task can be
ptraced by the outgoing task. This optimization only works when switching
directly between two user space tasks. When switching from a kernel task to
a user space task the optimization fails because the previous task cannot
be accessed anymore. So for quite some scenarios the optimization is just
adding overhead.

The upcoming conditional IBPB support will issue IBPB only for user space
tasks which have the TIF_SPEC_IB bit set. This requires to handle the
following cases:

  1) Switch from a user space task (potential attacker) which has
     TIF_SPEC_IB set to a user space task (potential victim) which has
     TIF_SPEC_IB not set.

  2) Switch from a user space task (potential attacker) which has
     TIF_SPEC_IB not set to a user space task (potential victim) which has
     TIF_SPEC_IB set.

This needs to be optimized for the case where the IBPB can be avoided when
only kernel threads ran in between user space tasks which belong to the
same process.

The current check whether two tasks belong to the same context is using the
tasks context id. While correct, it's simpler to use the mm pointer because
it allows to mangle the TIF_SPEC_IB bit into it. The context id based
mechanism requires extra storage, which creates worse code.

When a task is scheduled out its TIF_SPEC_IB bit is mangled as bit 0 into
the per CPU storage which is used to track the last user space mm which was
running on a CPU. This bit can be used together with the TIF_SPEC_IB bit of
the incoming task to make the decision whether IBPB needs to be issued or
not to cover the two cases above.

As conditional IBPB is going to be the default, remove the dubious ptrace
check for the IBPB always case and simply issue IBPB always when the
process changes.

Move the storage to a different place in the struct as the original one
created a hole.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
Cc: Tim Chen <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
Cc: Asit Mallick <[email protected]>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Cc: Jon Masters <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Stewart <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions