diff options
| author | Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> | 2024-03-12 09:49:52 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> | 2024-03-12 09:55:57 +0100 |
| commit | 2e2bc42c8381d2c0e9604b59e49264821da29368 (patch) | |
| tree | c158510b5e7942b3a0d6eb6807cbeacf96035798 /rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs | |
| parent | 428080c9b19bfda37c478cd626dbd3851db1aff9 (diff) | |
| parent | 855684c7d938c2442f07eabc154e7532b4c1fbf9 (diff) | |
Merge branch 'linus' into x86/boot, to resolve conflict
There's a new conflict with Linus's upstream tree, because
in the following merge conflict resolution in <asm/coco.h>:
38b334fc767e Merge tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.9_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Linus has resolved the conflicting placement of 'cc_mask' better
than the original commit:
1c811d403afd x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable references in startup code
... which was also done by an internal merge resolution:
2e5fc4786b7a Merge branch 'x86/sev' into x86/boot, to resolve conflicts and to pick up dependent tree
But Linus is right in 38b334fc767e, the 'cc_mask' declaration is sufficient
within the #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM block.
So instead of forcing Linus to do the same resolution again, merge in Linus's
tree and follow his conflict resolution.
Conflicts:
arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs')
| -rw-r--r-- | rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs | 30 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs index 77cdbcf7bd2e..7d4c4bf58388 100644 --- a/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ use core::{ mem::{ManuallyDrop, MaybeUninit}, ops::{Deref, DerefMut}, pin::Pin, - ptr::{NonNull, Pointee}, + ptr::NonNull, }; use macros::pin_data; @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ mod std_vendor; /// b: u32, /// } /// -/// // Create a ref-counted instance of `Example`. +/// // Create a refcounted instance of `Example`. /// let obj = Arc::try_new(Example { a: 10, b: 20 })?; /// /// // Get a new pointer to `obj` and increment the refcount. @@ -239,22 +239,20 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> Arc<T> { // binary, so its layout is not so large that it can trigger arithmetic overflow. let val_offset = unsafe { refcount_layout.extend(val_layout).unwrap_unchecked().1 }; - let metadata: <T as Pointee>::Metadata = core::ptr::metadata(ptr); - // SAFETY: The metadata of `T` and `ArcInner<T>` is the same because `ArcInner` is a struct - // with `T` as its last field. + // Pointer casts leave the metadata unchanged. This is okay because the metadata of `T` and + // `ArcInner<T>` is the same since `ArcInner` is a struct with `T` as its last field. // // This is documented at: // <https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ptr/trait.Pointee.html>. - let metadata: <ArcInner<T> as Pointee>::Metadata = - unsafe { core::mem::transmute_copy(&metadata) }; + let ptr = ptr as *const ArcInner<T>; + // SAFETY: The pointer is in-bounds of an allocation both before and after offsetting the // pointer, since it originates from a previous call to `Arc::into_raw` and is still valid. - let ptr = unsafe { (ptr as *mut u8).sub(val_offset) as *mut () }; - let ptr = core::ptr::from_raw_parts_mut(ptr, metadata); + let ptr = unsafe { ptr.byte_sub(val_offset) }; // SAFETY: By the safety requirements we know that `ptr` came from `Arc::into_raw`, so the // reference count held then will be owned by the new `Arc` object. - unsafe { Self::from_inner(NonNull::new_unchecked(ptr)) } + unsafe { Self::from_inner(NonNull::new_unchecked(ptr.cast_mut())) } } /// Returns an [`ArcBorrow`] from the given [`Arc`]. @@ -365,12 +363,12 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> From<Pin<UniqueArc<T>>> for Arc<T> { /// A borrowed reference to an [`Arc`] instance. /// /// For cases when one doesn't ever need to increment the refcount on the allocation, it is simpler -/// to use just `&T`, which we can trivially get from an `Arc<T>` instance. +/// to use just `&T`, which we can trivially get from an [`Arc<T>`] instance. /// /// However, when one may need to increment the refcount, it is preferable to use an `ArcBorrow<T>` /// over `&Arc<T>` because the latter results in a double-indirection: a pointer (shared reference) -/// to a pointer (`Arc<T>`) to the object (`T`). An [`ArcBorrow`] eliminates this double -/// indirection while still allowing one to increment the refcount and getting an `Arc<T>` when/if +/// to a pointer ([`Arc<T>`]) to the object (`T`). An [`ArcBorrow`] eliminates this double +/// indirection while still allowing one to increment the refcount and getting an [`Arc<T>`] when/if /// needed. /// /// # Invariants @@ -510,7 +508,7 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> Deref for ArcBorrow<'_, T> { /// # test().unwrap(); /// ``` /// -/// In the following example we first allocate memory for a ref-counted `Example` but we don't +/// In the following example we first allocate memory for a refcounted `Example` but we don't /// initialise it on allocation. We do initialise it later with a call to [`UniqueArc::write`], /// followed by a conversion to `Arc<Example>`. This is particularly useful when allocation happens /// in one context (e.g., sleepable) and initialisation in another (e.g., atomic): @@ -560,7 +558,7 @@ impl<T> UniqueArc<T> { /// Tries to allocate a new [`UniqueArc`] instance. pub fn try_new(value: T) -> Result<Self, AllocError> { Ok(Self { - // INVARIANT: The newly-created object has a ref-count of 1. + // INVARIANT: The newly-created object has a refcount of 1. inner: Arc::try_new(value)?, }) } @@ -574,7 +572,7 @@ impl<T> UniqueArc<T> { data <- init::uninit::<T, AllocError>(), }? AllocError))?; Ok(UniqueArc { - // INVARIANT: The newly-created object has a ref-count of 1. + // INVARIANT: The newly-created object has a refcount of 1. // SAFETY: The pointer from the `Box` is valid. inner: unsafe { Arc::from_inner(Box::leak(inner).into()) }, }) |