Merge branch 'x86/urgent' into x86/fpu, to resolve a conflict

Resolve the conflict between these commits:

   x86/fpu:      1193f408cd51 ("x86/fpu/signal: Change return type of __fpu_restore_sig() to boolean")

   x86/urgent:   d298b03506d3 ("x86/fpu: Restore the masking out of reserved MXCSR bits")
                 b2381acd3fd9 ("x86/fpu: Mask out the invalid MXCSR bits properly")

 Conflicts:
        arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 55 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 03b66d154b2b..3a3cb09eec12 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1961,24 +1961,65 @@ static struct sk_buff *xfrm_policy_netlink(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
 	return skb;
 }
 
+static int xfrm_notify_userpolicy(struct net *net)
+{
+	struct xfrm_userpolicy_default *up;
+	int len = NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(*up));
+	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	int err;
+
+	skb = nlmsg_new(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (skb == NULL)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, 0, 0, XFRM_MSG_GETDEFAULT, sizeof(*up), 0);
+	if (nlh == NULL) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
+	}
+
+	up = nlmsg_data(nlh);
+	up->in = net->xfrm.policy_default & XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_IN ?
+			XFRM_USERPOLICY_BLOCK : XFRM_USERPOLICY_ACCEPT;
+	up->fwd = net->xfrm.policy_default & XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_FWD ?
+			XFRM_USERPOLICY_BLOCK : XFRM_USERPOLICY_ACCEPT;
+	up->out = net->xfrm.policy_default & XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_OUT ?
+			XFRM_USERPOLICY_BLOCK : XFRM_USERPOLICY_ACCEPT;
+
+	nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	err = xfrm_nlmsg_multicast(net, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_POLICY);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int xfrm_set_default(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 			    struct nlattr **attrs)
 {
 	struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
 	struct xfrm_userpolicy_default *up = nlmsg_data(nlh);
-	u8 dirmask;
-	u8 old_default = net->xfrm.policy_default;
 
-	if (up->dirmask >= XFRM_USERPOLICY_DIRMASK_MAX)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (up->in == XFRM_USERPOLICY_BLOCK)
+		net->xfrm.policy_default |= XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_IN;
+	else if (up->in == XFRM_USERPOLICY_ACCEPT)
+		net->xfrm.policy_default &= ~XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_IN;
 
-	dirmask = (1 << up->dirmask) & XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_MASK;
+	if (up->fwd == XFRM_USERPOLICY_BLOCK)
+		net->xfrm.policy_default |= XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_FWD;
+	else if (up->fwd == XFRM_USERPOLICY_ACCEPT)
+		net->xfrm.policy_default &= ~XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_FWD;
 
-	net->xfrm.policy_default = (old_default & (0xff ^ dirmask))
-				    | (up->action << up->dirmask);
+	if (up->out == XFRM_USERPOLICY_BLOCK)
+		net->xfrm.policy_default |= XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_OUT;
+	else if (up->out == XFRM_USERPOLICY_ACCEPT)
+		net->xfrm.policy_default &= ~XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_OUT;
 
 	rt_genid_bump_all(net);
 
+	xfrm_notify_userpolicy(net);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1988,13 +2029,11 @@ static int xfrm_get_default(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 	struct sk_buff *r_skb;
 	struct nlmsghdr *r_nlh;
 	struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
-	struct xfrm_userpolicy_default *r_up, *up;
+	struct xfrm_userpolicy_default *r_up;
 	int len = NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct xfrm_userpolicy_default));
 	u32 portid = NETLINK_CB(skb).portid;
 	u32 seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
 
-	up = nlmsg_data(nlh);
-
 	r_skb = nlmsg_new(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!r_skb)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -2007,8 +2046,12 @@ static int xfrm_get_default(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 
 	r_up = nlmsg_data(r_nlh);
 
-	r_up->action = ((net->xfrm.policy_default & (1 << up->dirmask)) >> up->dirmask);
-	r_up->dirmask = up->dirmask;
+	r_up->in = net->xfrm.policy_default & XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_IN ?
+			XFRM_USERPOLICY_BLOCK : XFRM_USERPOLICY_ACCEPT;
+	r_up->fwd = net->xfrm.policy_default & XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_FWD ?
+			XFRM_USERPOLICY_BLOCK : XFRM_USERPOLICY_ACCEPT;
+	r_up->out = net->xfrm.policy_default & XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_OUT ?
+			XFRM_USERPOLICY_BLOCK : XFRM_USERPOLICY_ACCEPT;
 	nlmsg_end(r_skb, r_nlh);
 
 	return nlmsg_unicast(net->xfrm.nlsk, r_skb, portid);