pwm: atmel: Don't use pwm consumer API

Lowlevel driver callbacks are not supposed to use the consumer API
functions. Currently this works, but with the upcoming locking changes
this probably results in dead locks.

Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
index 47bcc8a3bf9d..26573829e391 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
@@ -294,19 +294,16 @@ static int atmel_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 			   const struct pwm_state *state)
 {
 	struct atmel_pwm_chip *atmel_pwm = to_atmel_pwm_chip(chip);
-	struct pwm_state cstate;
 	unsigned long cprd, cdty;
 	u32 pres, val;
 	int ret;
 
-	pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
-
 	if (state->enabled) {
 		unsigned long clkrate = clk_get_rate(atmel_pwm->clk);
 
-		if (cstate.enabled &&
-		    cstate.polarity == state->polarity &&
-		    cstate.period == state->period) {
+		if (pwm->state.enabled &&
+		    pwm->state.polarity == state->polarity &&
+		    pwm->state.period == state->period) {
 			u32 cmr = atmel_pwm_ch_readl(atmel_pwm, pwm->hwpwm, PWM_CMR);
 
 			cprd = atmel_pwm_ch_readl(atmel_pwm, pwm->hwpwm,
@@ -328,7 +325,7 @@ static int atmel_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 
 		atmel_pwm_calculate_cdty(state, clkrate, cprd, pres, &cdty);
 
-		if (cstate.enabled) {
+		if (pwm->state.enabled) {
 			atmel_pwm_disable(chip, pwm, false);
 		} else {
 			ret = clk_enable(atmel_pwm->clk);
@@ -348,7 +345,7 @@ static int atmel_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		atmel_pwm_ch_writel(atmel_pwm, pwm->hwpwm, PWM_CMR, val);
 		atmel_pwm_set_cprd_cdty(chip, pwm, cprd, cdty);
 		atmel_pwm_writel(atmel_pwm, PWM_ENA, 1 << pwm->hwpwm);
-	} else if (cstate.enabled) {
+	} else if (pwm->state.enabled) {
 		atmel_pwm_disable(chip, pwm, true);
 	}