aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Hildenbrand <[email protected]>2024-08-02 17:55:21 +0200
committerAndrew Morton <[email protected]>2024-09-01 20:26:01 -0700
commit85a7e5432dba4c750129797feb399a7bff8b241f (patch)
tree0193ce5298414855ca160a116f86498c264c72b0 /arch/s390/mm/fault.c
parent8710f6ed34e7bcf98971d65acfb5eaed5fc469b0 (diff)
s390/uv: convert gmap_destroy_page() from follow_page() to folio_walk
Let's get rid of another follow_page() user and perform the UV calls under PTL -- which likely should be fine. No need for an additional reference while holding the PTL: uv_destroy_folio() and uv_convert_from_secure_folio() raise the refcount, so any concurrent make_folio_secure() would see an unexpted reference and cannot set PG_arch_1 concurrently. Do we really need a writable PTE? Likely yes, because the "destroy" part is, in comparison to the export, a destructive operation. So we'll keep the writability check for now. We'll lose the secretmem check from follow_page(). Likely we don't care about that here. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Cc: Janosch Frank <[email protected]> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> Cc: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]> Cc: Ryan Roberts <[email protected]> Cc: Zi Yan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390/mm/fault.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions