diff options
author | Nico Boehr <[email protected]> | 2024-09-17 17:18:33 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> | 2024-10-10 15:31:55 +0200 |
commit | e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 (patch) | |
tree | bb012747962a27afc5122c3a64994ed5abdf6a0f /arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | |
parent | 78f636e82b2288462498e235dc5a886426ce5dd7 (diff) |
KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot
Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest
address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since
kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case.
However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails.
When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot
usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the
guest.
Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong
in userspace and hence should be handled there.
To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in
access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In
access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that
kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into
the guest (if applicable).
Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make
sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value.
There are the following users of access_guest_page():
- access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in
guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the
handling is set up properly.
- access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which
are:
- read_guest_real() - see below
- write_guest_real() - see below
There are the following users of read_guest_real():
- ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_*
- setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always
return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change
- shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this
could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change
There are the following users of write_guest_real():
- kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on
write_guest_real() failure.
Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c @@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa, const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa); int rc; + if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn)) + return PGM_ADDRESSING; if (mode == GACC_STORE) rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len); else @@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, gra += fragment_len; data += fragment_len; } + if (rc > 0) + vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc; return rc; } |