Blaster4385/linux-IllusionX
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain

Browse source 
[ Upstream commit 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 ]

Original state:

        Process 1       Process 2       Process 3       Process 4
         (BIC1)          (BIC2)          (BIC3)          (BIC4)
          Λ                |               |               |
           \--------------\ \-------------\ \-------------\|
                           V               V               V
          bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4
    ref    0               1               2               4

After commit 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge
chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()"), if P1 issues a new IO:

Without the patch:

        Process 1       Process 2       Process 3       Process 4
         (BIC1)          (BIC2)          (BIC3)          (BIC4)
          Λ                |               |               |
           \------------------------------\ \-------------\|
                                           V               V
          bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4
    ref    0               0               2               4

bfqq3 will be used to handle IO from P1, this is not expected, IO
should be redirected to bfqq4;

With the patch:

          -------------------------------------------
          |                                         |
        Process 1       Process 2       Process 3   |   Process 4
         (BIC1)          (BIC2)          (BIC3)     |    (BIC4)
                           |               |        |      |
                            \-------------\ \-------------\|
                                           V               V
          bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4
    ref    0               0               2               4

IO is redirected to bfqq4, however, procress reference of bfqq3 is still
2, while there is only P2 using it.

Fix the problem by calling bfq_merge_bfqqs() for each bfqq in the merge
chain. Also change bfqq_merge_bfqqs() to return new_bfqq to simplify
code.

Fixes: 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Yu Kuai 2024-09-09 21:41:49 +08:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent cae58d1912
commit 054e3cdfc7
1 changed files with 17 additions and 20 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

37
block/bfq-iosched.c
View file

@ -3129,10 +3129,12 @@ void bfq_release_process_ref(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
bfq_put_queue(bfqq);
}
static void
bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic,
struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq)
static struct bfq_queue *bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
struct bfq_io_cq *bic,
struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
{
struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq;
bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "merging with queue %lu",
(unsigned long)new_bfqq->pid);
/* Save weight raising and idle window of the merged queues */
@ -3226,6 +3228,8 @@ bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic,
bfq_reassign_last_bfqq(bfqq, new_bfqq);
bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq);
return new_bfqq;
}
static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
@ -3261,14 +3265,8 @@ static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
* fulfilled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq
* and bfqq can be put.
*/
bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq,
new_bfqq);
/*
* If we get here, bio will be queued into new_queue,
* so use new_bfqq to decide whether bio and rq can be
* merged.
*/
bfqq = new_bfqq;
while (bfqq != new_bfqq)
bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq);
/*
* Change also bqfd->bio_bfqq, as
@ -5705,9 +5703,7 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
* state before killing it.
*/
bfqq->bic = bic;
bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq, new_bfqq);
return new_bfqq;
return bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq);
}
/*
@ -6162,6 +6158,7 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq)
bool waiting, idle_timer_disabled = false;
if (new_bfqq) {
struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq;
/*
* Release the request's reference to the old bfqq
* and make sure one is taken to the shared queue.
@ -6178,18 +6175,18 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq)
* new_bfqq.
*/
if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), true,
bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq)
bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq),
bfqq, new_bfqq);
bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) {
while (bfqq != new_bfqq)
bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), bfqq);
}
bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq);
bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(old_bfqq);
/*
* rq is about to be enqueued into new_bfqq,
* release rq reference on bfqq
*/
bfq_put_queue(bfqq);
bfq_put_queue(old_bfqq);
rq->elv.priv[1] = new_bfqq;
bfqq = new_bfqq;
}
bfq_update_io_thinktime(bfqd, bfqq);